Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Train-to-Train Impact Test: Occupant Protection Experiments
View through CrossRef
This paper describes the results of the occupant protection experiments included as part of the train-to-train impact test conducted at the Transportation Technology Center in Pueblo, Colorado on January 31, 2002. In this test, a cab car-led train, initially moving at 30 mph, collided with a standing locomotive-led train. The initially moving train included a cab car, three coach cars, and a trailing locomotive, while the initially standing train included a locomotive and two open-top hopper cars. The hopper cars were ballasted with earth such that the two trains weighed the same, approximately 635 kips each. The cars were instrumented with strain gauges, accelerometers, and string potentiometers, to measure the deformation of critical structural elements, the longitudinal, vertical, and lateral car body accelerations, and the displacements of the truck suspensions. As part of the test, the cars were equipped with instrumented test dummies seated in three interior arrangements: 1. Forward-facing unrestrained occupants seated in rows, compartmentalized by the forward seat in order to limit the motions of the occupants. 2. Forward-facing restrained occupants with lap and shoulder belts. 3. Forward-facing unrestrained occupant seated in the locomotive operator seat. The longitudinal, vertical, and lateral motions of the cars during the train-to-train impact test are discussed in the paper, as well as their influence on the responses of the instrumented dummies. The lateral motions of the cars had some influence on the response of the test dummies, however the vertical motions of the cars had a greater influence on their response. During the test, the cab car overrode the locomotive. This large upward vertical motion of the cab car helped the test dummies in the cab car remain in their seats. The longitudinal motions of the cars during the train-to-train test had lower injury potential than the longitudinal motions of the cars in the previously conducted single- and two-car impact tests. (In these tests, a single car impacted a fixed barrier and two coupled cars impacted a fixed barrier, respectively. Test dummies were also included in both of these tests.) In the train-to-train test the test dummies endured a much longer crash pulse, with a lower average longitudinal acceleration than in the single-car and two-car impact tests. In the train-to-train test only one unrestrained test dummy landed in the aisle after impacting the seat in front of it. All injury criteria values remained below threshold values.
Title: Train-to-Train Impact Test: Occupant Protection Experiments
Description:
This paper describes the results of the occupant protection experiments included as part of the train-to-train impact test conducted at the Transportation Technology Center in Pueblo, Colorado on January 31, 2002.
In this test, a cab car-led train, initially moving at 30 mph, collided with a standing locomotive-led train.
The initially moving train included a cab car, three coach cars, and a trailing locomotive, while the initially standing train included a locomotive and two open-top hopper cars.
The hopper cars were ballasted with earth such that the two trains weighed the same, approximately 635 kips each.
The cars were instrumented with strain gauges, accelerometers, and string potentiometers, to measure the deformation of critical structural elements, the longitudinal, vertical, and lateral car body accelerations, and the displacements of the truck suspensions.
As part of the test, the cars were equipped with instrumented test dummies seated in three interior arrangements: 1.
Forward-facing unrestrained occupants seated in rows, compartmentalized by the forward seat in order to limit the motions of the occupants.
2.
Forward-facing restrained occupants with lap and shoulder belts.
3.
Forward-facing unrestrained occupant seated in the locomotive operator seat.
The longitudinal, vertical, and lateral motions of the cars during the train-to-train impact test are discussed in the paper, as well as their influence on the responses of the instrumented dummies.
The lateral motions of the cars had some influence on the response of the test dummies, however the vertical motions of the cars had a greater influence on their response.
During the test, the cab car overrode the locomotive.
This large upward vertical motion of the cab car helped the test dummies in the cab car remain in their seats.
The longitudinal motions of the cars during the train-to-train test had lower injury potential than the longitudinal motions of the cars in the previously conducted single- and two-car impact tests.
(In these tests, a single car impacted a fixed barrier and two coupled cars impacted a fixed barrier, respectively.
Test dummies were also included in both of these tests.
) In the train-to-train test the test dummies endured a much longer crash pulse, with a lower average longitudinal acceleration than in the single-car and two-car impact tests.
In the train-to-train test only one unrestrained test dummy landed in the aisle after impacting the seat in front of it.
All injury criteria values remained below threshold values.
Related Results
Load-Limiters Effect on Occupant Restraint System Performance
Load-Limiters Effect on Occupant Restraint System Performance
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">This paper investigates the role that load-limiters play with respect to the performance of occupant prote...
Biomechanics of Occupant Responses during Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle (ROV) Riding and 90-degree Tip-overs
Biomechanics of Occupant Responses during Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle (ROV) Riding and 90-degree Tip-overs
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Recently, side-by-side Recreational Off-Highway Vehicles (ROVs) have brought elements of the on-road vehic...
Locomotive Cab Occupant Protection
Locomotive Cab Occupant Protection
The effectiveness of fitting a locomotive cab with a passive inflatable restraint system utilizing inflatable structures, and interior padding to protect the operator has been eval...
Vulnerability of riders and passengers to injuries in multi-occupant motorcycle crashes
Vulnerability of riders and passengers to injuries in multi-occupant motorcycle crashes
Background
Motorcycles in Low-Mid Income Countries (LMIC) are rarely ridden for recreational purposes; rather they form an essential part of daily commuting. Cons...
Occupant Protection via Frontal Crash Testing Analysis
Occupant Protection via Frontal Crash Testing Analysis
During frontal collisions, two central characteristics that define a vehicle’s crashworthiness are the occupant compartment deceleration magnitude and the level of occupant compart...
Vehicle Occupant Posture Classification System using Seat Pressure Sensor for Intelligent Airbag
Vehicle Occupant Posture Classification System using Seat Pressure Sensor for Intelligent Airbag
<div class="htmlview paragraph">In the intelligent airbag system, the detection accuracy of occupant position is the precondition and plays a vital role to control airbag det...
To Assess the Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline Nebulized Suctioning On Airway Clearance Among Patients On Mechanical Ventilator In Selected Hospitals
To Assess the Effectiveness of Hypertonic Saline Nebulized Suctioning On Airway Clearance Among Patients On Mechanical Ventilator In Selected Hospitals
OBJECTIVES- 1) To assess the airway clearance of patients on mechanical ventilator in experimental and control group in selected hospitals. 2) To assess the effectiveness of hypert...
Research on urban rail train control system based on train to train communication
Research on urban rail train control system based on train to train communication
Abstract
The new train control system VBTC based on train to train communication adopts the idea of on-board centralization, regards switches and sections as tracksi...

