Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clinicopathologic significance of legumain overexpression in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View through CrossRef
AbstractSince reports on the clinical significance of legumain in cancer have shown inconsistent results, we systematically evaluated clinical indicators of legumain in cancer. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and EBSCO databases and the Wangfang and CNKI databases in China by using “legumain” and (“neoplasms” OR “cancer”) as search terms. We included case-controlled studies of legumain and cancer. The quality of the studies was evaluated by using Lichtenstein’s guidelines and valid data was extracted for analysis. In total, 10 articles were included in this study. Meta-analysis showed that legumain was overexpressed in cancer compared with in normal tissue and was higher in stage III–IV disease than in I–II disease. Moreover, legumain overexpression was correlated with poor prognosis and clinical stage. Furthermore, Cancer Genome Atlas data showed that among patients with rectal cancer, those with tumors overexpressing legumain had shorter overall survival than those in the low expression group (P < 0.05). Legumain appears to be involved in tumor development and deterioration; thus, it can potentially be developed into both a marker for monitoring and diagnosing tumors and a therapeutic target.
Title: Clinicopathologic significance of legumain overexpression in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Description:
AbstractSince reports on the clinical significance of legumain in cancer have shown inconsistent results, we systematically evaluated clinical indicators of legumain in cancer.
We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and EBSCO databases and the Wangfang and CNKI databases in China by using “legumain” and (“neoplasms” OR “cancer”) as search terms.
We included case-controlled studies of legumain and cancer.
The quality of the studies was evaluated by using Lichtenstein’s guidelines and valid data was extracted for analysis.
In total, 10 articles were included in this study.
Meta-analysis showed that legumain was overexpressed in cancer compared with in normal tissue and was higher in stage III–IV disease than in I–II disease.
Moreover, legumain overexpression was correlated with poor prognosis and clinical stage.
Furthermore, Cancer Genome Atlas data showed that among patients with rectal cancer, those with tumors overexpressing legumain had shorter overall survival than those in the low expression group (P < 0.
05).
Legumain appears to be involved in tumor development and deterioration; thus, it can potentially be developed into both a marker for monitoring and diagnosing tumors and a therapeutic target.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
FAIMS-enabled N-terminomics analysis reveals novel legumain substrates in murine spleen
FAIMS-enabled N-terminomics analysis reveals novel legumain substrates in murine spleen
Abstract Aberrant levels of the asparaginyl endopeptidase legumain have been linked to inflammation, neurodegeneration and cancer, yet our unders...
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Edoxaban and Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Cancer patients face a venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk that is up to 50 times higher compared to individuals without cancer. In 2010, direct oral anticoagul...
Legumain (EC 3.4.22.34)
Legumain (EC 3.4.22.34)
Abstract It has been known since the initial discovery of Csoma and Polgar in 1984 [1292] that the seeds of several legumes and other plants contain an endopeptid...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Are Cervical Ribs Indicators of Childhood Cancer? A Narrative Review
Abstract A cervical rib (CR), also known as a supernumerary or extra rib, is an additional rib that forms above the first rib, resulting from the overgrowth of the transverse proce...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...

Back to Top