Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Efficacy and accuracy of Invisalign attachments: an updated systematic review
View through CrossRef
Background: The primary purposes of Invisalign® technology are to treat minor to moderate crowding problems and patch up minute cracks. But more recent research and development have made it possible to cure more complex malocclusions. Although the accuracy of Invisalign-assisted orthodontic tooth movements has been researched, the effectiveness of various attachment methods and other aligner factors has not been thoroughly assessed. This study aimed at assessing the accuracy and efficacy of the Invisalign attachment mechanism as described in the most recent publications.
Method: A systematic assessment of research examining the precision and efficacy of Invisalign attachments between 2019 and 2022 was performed employing Google Scholar and PubMed databases. The keywords were "efficacy, accuracy, Invisalign attachments, clear aligners, Invisalign®, invisible orthodontics, treatment results," which were used in various combinations. Original research describing the precision and effectiveness of the Invisalign attachments and full-text papers met the criteria for inclusion.
Results: Only 8 articles out of 14 met the requirements for inclusion. Six studies were retrospective, one was prospective observational research, and one was a case-series investigation. Together, they involved 621 people. Even though Invisalign® orthodontic treatment is widely used, aside from the non-extraction treatment of mild to moderate malocclusions in non-growing patients, there are presently no definitive recommendations on additional indications of the system based on trustworthy scientific evidence. Invisalign attachments, transparent aligners, and full-text studies demonstrated its efficacy in the non-extraction correction of mild to moderate malocclusions in patients who were not growing.
Conclusion: Despite the large number of studies examined in this study, evaluations of treatment results need to be cautious due to the significant heterogeneity. For a broad spectrum of malocclusions and expanding patient populations, further research involving parallel arm RCTs or carefully planned prospective trials is necessary to develop solid clinical recommendations.
Discover STM Publishing Ltd.
Title: Efficacy and accuracy of Invisalign attachments: an updated systematic review
Description:
Background: The primary purposes of Invisalign® technology are to treat minor to moderate crowding problems and patch up minute cracks.
But more recent research and development have made it possible to cure more complex malocclusions.
Although the accuracy of Invisalign-assisted orthodontic tooth movements has been researched, the effectiveness of various attachment methods and other aligner factors has not been thoroughly assessed.
This study aimed at assessing the accuracy and efficacy of the Invisalign attachment mechanism as described in the most recent publications.
Method: A systematic assessment of research examining the precision and efficacy of Invisalign attachments between 2019 and 2022 was performed employing Google Scholar and PubMed databases.
The keywords were "efficacy, accuracy, Invisalign attachments, clear aligners, Invisalign®, invisible orthodontics, treatment results," which were used in various combinations.
Original research describing the precision and effectiveness of the Invisalign attachments and full-text papers met the criteria for inclusion.
Results: Only 8 articles out of 14 met the requirements for inclusion.
Six studies were retrospective, one was prospective observational research, and one was a case-series investigation.
Together, they involved 621 people.
Even though Invisalign® orthodontic treatment is widely used, aside from the non-extraction treatment of mild to moderate malocclusions in non-growing patients, there are presently no definitive recommendations on additional indications of the system based on trustworthy scientific evidence.
Invisalign attachments, transparent aligners, and full-text studies demonstrated its efficacy in the non-extraction correction of mild to moderate malocclusions in patients who were not growing.
Conclusion: Despite the large number of studies examined in this study, evaluations of treatment results need to be cautious due to the significant heterogeneity.
For a broad spectrum of malocclusions and expanding patient populations, further research involving parallel arm RCTs or carefully planned prospective trials is necessary to develop solid clinical recommendations.
Related Results
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical activi...
Treatment Efficacy of Invisalign: Literature Review Update
Treatment Efficacy of Invisalign: Literature Review Update
Purpose: Inconsistency between computer prediction and actual tooth movement in Invisalign treatment always limits clinical judgment. The objective of this review was to update the...
Management of the Meantime: The Senses, Attachments, and Time in the Aesthetic City
Management of the Meantime: The Senses, Attachments, and Time in the Aesthetic City
In this dissertation, I study the aestheticization of the city through the temporary use of space and culture, a strategy known as temporary urbanism. The study takes place in Refs...
Accuracy Evaluation of Indirect Bonding Techniques for Clear Aligner Attachments Using 3D-Printed Models: An In Silico and Physical Model-Based Study
Accuracy Evaluation of Indirect Bonding Techniques for Clear Aligner Attachments Using 3D-Printed Models: An In Silico and Physical Model-Based Study
An inaccurate bonding procedure of the attachments related to clear aligner systems could influence the predictability of tooth movement The aim of this study was to compare the po...
Efficacy and Accuracy of Maxillary Arch Expansion with Clear Aligner Treatment
Efficacy and Accuracy of Maxillary Arch Expansion with Clear Aligner Treatment
The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and accuracy of maxillary arch transverse expansion using the Invisalign® clear aligner system without auxiliaries other than Invi...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Predictability of maxillary transverse changes with Invisalign in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Predictability of maxillary transverse changes with Invisalign in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background:
To systematically evaluate the predictability of Invisalign for maxillary transverse expansion in adult patients.
...
Mouldability of Additively Manufactured Attachments on Multipoint Tools
Mouldability of Additively Manufactured Attachments on Multipoint Tools
Enhanced multipoint moulding with additive attachments (EMMA) is a process combining vacuum-assisted multipoint moulding (VAMM) and additively manufactured moulding attachments for...

