Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Imaginaries and problematisations: A heuristic lens in the age of artificial intelligence in education

View through CrossRef
Abstract This paper suggests that artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) can be fruitfully analysed as ‘policies frozen in silicon’. This means that they exist as both materialised and proposed problematisations (problem representations with corresponding solutions). As a theoretical and analytical response, this paper puts forward a heuristic lens that can provide insights into how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to certain problematisations based on various imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported. The combined reading of imaginaries and problematisations can thereby aid in our understanding of why and how visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments. The overall ambition is to advance theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology‐augmented) education in society. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) is repeatedly presented as a solution for a range of educational ‘problems’. This means that such ‘solutions’ must also frame certain aspects as ‘problems’. Such problems and ‘solutions’ (problematisations) also exist within certain imaginaries of the present times and of the future, where these problematisations are presented as particularly significant and acute, and promoting specific anticipations of learning and ideals of education. What this paper adds An exposition of problematisations in educational settings. An exposition of educational imaginaries. A heuristic lens for understanding the ‘present’ and ‘future’ in a particular imaginary as entangled in, and dependent on, a certain ‘past’. Implications for practice and/or policy The approach presented in this paper provides a heuristic lens for examining how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to problematisations based on imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported. This aids our understanding of how and why certain visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments (real or imagined). It also advances theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system, which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology‐augmented) education in society.
Title: Imaginaries and problematisations: A heuristic lens in the age of artificial intelligence in education
Description:
Abstract This paper suggests that artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) can be fruitfully analysed as ‘policies frozen in silicon’.
This means that they exist as both materialised and proposed problematisations (problem representations with corresponding solutions).
As a theoretical and analytical response, this paper puts forward a heuristic lens that can provide insights into how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to certain problematisations based on various imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported.
The combined reading of imaginaries and problematisations can thereby aid in our understanding of why and how visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments.
The overall ambition is to advance theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology‐augmented) education in society.
Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) is repeatedly presented as a solution for a range of educational ‘problems’.
This means that such ‘solutions’ must also frame certain aspects as ‘problems’.
Such problems and ‘solutions’ (problematisations) also exist within certain imaginaries of the present times and of the future, where these problematisations are presented as particularly significant and acute, and promoting specific anticipations of learning and ideals of education.
What this paper adds An exposition of problematisations in educational settings.
An exposition of educational imaginaries.
A heuristic lens for understanding the ‘present’ and ‘future’ in a particular imaginary as entangled in, and dependent on, a certain ‘past’.
Implications for practice and/or policy The approach presented in this paper provides a heuristic lens for examining how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to problematisations based on imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported.
This aids our understanding of how and why certain visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments (real or imagined).
It also advances theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system, which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology‐augmented) education in society.

Related Results

Morphometric OCT parameters of the lens under accommodative stimulus. Report 1. Assessment of age-related changes
Morphometric OCT parameters of the lens under accommodative stimulus. Report 1. Assessment of age-related changes
Introduction. The structural approach to studying the mechanism of accommodation and its age-related changes focuses on analyzing morphometric parameters (size, shape, and position...
La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
La luz: de herramienta a lenguaje. Una nueva metodología de iluminación artificial en el proyecto arquitectónico.
The constant development of artificial lighting throughout the twentieth century helped to develop architecture to the current situation in which a new methodology is needed for ...
Attitudes toward and readiness for medical artificial intelligence among medical and health science students
Attitudes toward and readiness for medical artificial intelligence among medical and health science students
Purpose: This study assessed general attitudes toward artificial intelligence and medical artificial intelligence readiness among medical and health sciences students and examined ...
Artificial intelligence in justice: legal and psychological aspects of law enforcement
Artificial intelligence in justice: legal and psychological aspects of law enforcement
The subject. Artificial intelligence is considered as an interdisciplinary legal and psychological phenomenon. The special need to strengthen the psychological component in legal r...
Structural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 2. Changes in the anatomical complex of the lens
Structural and functional features of the eye in Marfan syndrome. Report 2. Changes in the anatomical complex of the lens
Analysis of lens changes in Marfan syndrome (MS), in addition to assessing the position of the lens itself, should include the possibility of examining its supporting and accommoda...
Molecular Genetics of Cataract
Molecular Genetics of Cataract
Abstract Cataract can be defined as any opacity or cloudiness of the crystalline lens. When there is significant variation of the refractive ind...

Back to Top