Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection

View through CrossRef
John Rawls' Theory of Justice offers a robust conceptual framework for developing fair legal policies, particularly in the context of post-merger and acquisition corporate integration. This article explores Rawls' justice as fairness, focusing on the application of the difference principle to ensure proportional benefit distribution and the equal liberty principle to protect shareholder rights. In corporate integration processes, Rawls' principles emphasize the importance of fair treatment for all stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups such as minority shareholders, through transparency and accountability in decision-making. The article also contextualizes Rawls' theory with Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's developmental legal approach, which views law as a tool to balance economic dynamics and social justice. Using a doctrinal method, this study demonstrates that Rawls' principles provide a philosophical foundation for creating responsive and inclusive corporate regulations. These regulations not only promote economic efficiency but also protect the rights of vulnerable groups, making them relevant to addressing modern legal challenges.
Title: John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the Perspective of Shareholder Rights Protection
Description:
John Rawls' Theory of Justice offers a robust conceptual framework for developing fair legal policies, particularly in the context of post-merger and acquisition corporate integration.
This article explores Rawls' justice as fairness, focusing on the application of the difference principle to ensure proportional benefit distribution and the equal liberty principle to protect shareholder rights.
In corporate integration processes, Rawls' principles emphasize the importance of fair treatment for all stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups such as minority shareholders, through transparency and accountability in decision-making.
The article also contextualizes Rawls' theory with Mochtar Kusumaatmadja's developmental legal approach, which views law as a tool to balance economic dynamics and social justice.
Using a doctrinal method, this study demonstrates that Rawls' principles provide a philosophical foundation for creating responsive and inclusive corporate regulations.
These regulations not only promote economic efficiency but also protect the rights of vulnerable groups, making them relevant to addressing modern legal challenges.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
John Rawls
John Rawls
Abstract This collection of original essays explores major areas of debate inspired by the political philosophy of John Rawls. The volume is divided into ten parts, ...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Rawls and East Asian Philosophies
Rawls and East Asian Philosophies
Abstract Rawls barely mentions East Asian philosophies, but East Asian political philosophers, especially Confucians, have frequently regarded Rawls as “the Other” w...
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Keadilan Restoratif: Upaya Menemukan Keadilan Substantif?
Substantive justice is an idea of justice that seeks to present it comprehensively and completely in society. Substantive justice in this case does not only interpret the law as li...
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
A Review of the Constitutional Court's Use of International Human Rights Norms
Since the World War, international cooperation has been made to preserve the peace and interests of the human community, and representative results include the creation of internat...

Back to Top