Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Legal Review of Consumer Rights in Product Sales Through the Bundling System

View through CrossRef
The study aims to determine consumer rights in product sales through an adverse bundling system and dispute resolution efforts to maintain rights. The focus of the problem is the fulfillment of consumer rights and their resolution, both in court and out of court. The method of research used by the author is normative juridical, which examines theories, concepts, legal principles, and laws and regulations related to the research topic. Novelty of this research is the gap in the implementation of product sales strategies carried out by business actors with the GCPL Law in implementing a bundling system that forces consumers to buy products in packages. This emphasizes empowering weak consumers in the face of adverse conditions. Often the product sales strategies found can benefit consumers in shopping, thus making this research different from previous studies. The results showed that according to the GCPL, business actors should not force consumers to buy products with a bundling system, because it can reduce consumer comfort when shopping. In implementing the bundling system, it is natural to pay attention to the GCPL so as not to cause harm to consumers. Consumers also have the right to security, honest information about product conditions, and the right to choose goods according to the exchange rate stated in the GCPL Law. Conclusion, consumer protection can be carried out through LPKSM supervision seen from the obedience of business actors as prevention. Legal efforts that can be taken by consumers include peaceful settlement, BPSK, or court through a tort lawsuit.
Lembaga Riset dan Inovasi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
Title: Legal Review of Consumer Rights in Product Sales Through the Bundling System
Description:
The study aims to determine consumer rights in product sales through an adverse bundling system and dispute resolution efforts to maintain rights.
The focus of the problem is the fulfillment of consumer rights and their resolution, both in court and out of court.
The method of research used by the author is normative juridical, which examines theories, concepts, legal principles, and laws and regulations related to the research topic.
Novelty of this research is the gap in the implementation of product sales strategies carried out by business actors with the GCPL Law in implementing a bundling system that forces consumers to buy products in packages.
This emphasizes empowering weak consumers in the face of adverse conditions.
Often the product sales strategies found can benefit consumers in shopping, thus making this research different from previous studies.
The results showed that according to the GCPL, business actors should not force consumers to buy products with a bundling system, because it can reduce consumer comfort when shopping.
In implementing the bundling system, it is natural to pay attention to the GCPL so as not to cause harm to consumers.
Consumers also have the right to security, honest information about product conditions, and the right to choose goods according to the exchange rate stated in the GCPL Law.
Conclusion, consumer protection can be carried out through LPKSM supervision seen from the obedience of business actors as prevention.
Legal efforts that can be taken by consumers include peaceful settlement, BPSK, or court through a tort lawsuit.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
Social Rights in Refugee Law and Human Rights Law: The Non-discrimination Principle as a Harmonization Tool
The European “refugee crisis” of today may lead to tomorrow’s integration difficulties. The large-scale influx of refugees has brought and is bringing many who, unless the situatio...
Bundling : a clutter reduction technique and its application to Alzheimer study
Bundling : a clutter reduction technique and its application to Alzheimer study
Bundling : une technique de réduction d'occultation par agrégation visuelle et son application à l'étude de la maladie d'Alzheimer Le big data est un challenge maje...
Pengaruh Advertising, Brand Ambassador dan Product Bundling terhadap Purchase Decision pada Produk Scarlett Whitening
Pengaruh Advertising, Brand Ambassador dan Product Bundling terhadap Purchase Decision pada Produk Scarlett Whitening
Abstract. As competition in the skincare and bodycare business grows, many companies are taking advantage of opportunities to create new changes for their business including the ro...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere
From Constitutional Comparison to Life in the Biosphere is a monograph that argues for a fundamental reorientation of constitutional law around the realities of biospheric interdep...

Back to Top