Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

How does technology support regulation of learning? A systematic review of the design and efficacy of interventions

View through CrossRef
Students who successfully regulate their learning are more successful in higher education. As higher education increasingly adopts hybrid and flexible approaches, the importance of regulatory skills increases. Technology may support students in developing and applying regulatory skills. However, current literature displays a significant gap on exactly how technology contributes to what in regulation of learning.This systematic literature review addresses how technology can foster regulation of learning in higher education. We identified and analysed 136 studies describing empirical research on interventions using technology to support self-regulation, co-regulation or socially shared regulation of learning in higher education. To warrant a thorough analysis of how technology supports regulation, we distinguished between the medium used and the methods implemented within the interventions.The findings indicate a growing research interest, shifting from a primary focus on individual self-regulation towards co-regulation and socially shared regulation in groups of learners. It is promising that stronger study designs are used, with multimodal measurements and decent sample sizes and running durations. Most studies were conducted in online or blended learning environments. Self-regulated learning is predominantly supported by interactive tools, through scaffolding, feedback, and prompting. For co-regulation and socially shared regulation, conversational tools implementing scaffolding and feedback are used most. No studies implemented fading scaffolds; only static scaffolding was used.Most notably, we found that intervention designs were often insufficiently specified. This study presents an approach to describe intervention designs more clearly in future work, by listing explicit, theory-informed categories for medium and method.
Title: How does technology support regulation of learning? A systematic review of the design and efficacy of interventions
Description:
Students who successfully regulate their learning are more successful in higher education.
As higher education increasingly adopts hybrid and flexible approaches, the importance of regulatory skills increases.
Technology may support students in developing and applying regulatory skills.
However, current literature displays a significant gap on exactly how technology contributes to what in regulation of learning.
This systematic literature review addresses how technology can foster regulation of learning in higher education.
We identified and analysed 136 studies describing empirical research on interventions using technology to support self-regulation, co-regulation or socially shared regulation of learning in higher education.
To warrant a thorough analysis of how technology supports regulation, we distinguished between the medium used and the methods implemented within the interventions.
The findings indicate a growing research interest, shifting from a primary focus on individual self-regulation towards co-regulation and socially shared regulation in groups of learners.
It is promising that stronger study designs are used, with multimodal measurements and decent sample sizes and running durations.
Most studies were conducted in online or blended learning environments.
Self-regulated learning is predominantly supported by interactive tools, through scaffolding, feedback, and prompting.
For co-regulation and socially shared regulation, conversational tools implementing scaffolding and feedback are used most.
No studies implemented fading scaffolds; only static scaffolding was used.
Most notably, we found that intervention designs were often insufficiently specified.
This study presents an approach to describe intervention designs more clearly in future work, by listing explicit, theory-informed categories for medium and method.

Related Results

Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Design
Design
Conventional definitions of design rarely capture its reach into our everyday lives. The Design Council, for example, estimates that more than 2.5 million people use design-related...
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
Cash‐based approaches in humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review
This Campbell systematic review examines the effectiveness, efficiency and implementation of cash transfers in humanitarian settings. The review summarises evidence from five studi...
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing: A Systematic Review
This Campbell systematic review assesses the direct and indirect benefits of public police interventions that use procedurally just dialogue. The review summarises findings from 30...
How does technology support regulation of learning? A systematic review of the design and efficacy of interventions
How does technology support regulation of learning? A systematic review of the design and efficacy of interventions
Students who successfully regulate their learning are more successful in higher education. As higher education increasingly adopts hybrid and flexible approaches, the importance of...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...

Back to Top