Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Carbohydrate and peptide specificity of MHC class II-restricted T cell hybridomas raised against an O-glycosylated self peptide.

View through CrossRef
Abstract MHC class II E(k)-restricted, IL-2 secreting T cell hybridomas were raised against the synthetic glycopeptide Hb(67-76)-alpha-GalNAc, (T72(Tn)), in CBA/J mice (H-2(k)). The fine specificity of the hybridomas against the glycan moiety was investigated by testing their response against a panel of Hb(67-76)-derived glycopeptides, all with a glycan attached to serine or threonine at the position 72 in the peptide, but with different glycans. The hybridomas showed a high degree of specificity for the alpha-GalNAc moiety with few and faint cross-responses to the glycopeptides having other glycans attached even though some of these were structurally very similar to alpha-GalNAc. The fine specificity of the hybridomas for the peptide moiety was investigated by testing their responses to a panel of Hb(67-76)-alpha-GalNAc glycopeptides with alanine substitutions at all positions except at the two MHC binding anchor positions, I68 and K76, and the T72 to which the alpha-GalNAc was attached. Glycopeptides substituted with alanine at positions where the amino acid side chain pointed toward the TCR did not stimulate the hybridomas, whereas glycopeptides substituted with alanine at positions orientated down into the MHC binding groove stimulated many of the hybridomas. These results indicate that the glycan attached to the peptide as well as solvent-accessible parts of the peptide are recognized with a high degree of specificity by the T cells, whereas the parts of the peptide buried in the MHC binding site are less important or totally ignored by the T cells.
Title: Carbohydrate and peptide specificity of MHC class II-restricted T cell hybridomas raised against an O-glycosylated self peptide.
Description:
Abstract MHC class II E(k)-restricted, IL-2 secreting T cell hybridomas were raised against the synthetic glycopeptide Hb(67-76)-alpha-GalNAc, (T72(Tn)), in CBA/J mice (H-2(k)).
The fine specificity of the hybridomas against the glycan moiety was investigated by testing their response against a panel of Hb(67-76)-derived glycopeptides, all with a glycan attached to serine or threonine at the position 72 in the peptide, but with different glycans.
The hybridomas showed a high degree of specificity for the alpha-GalNAc moiety with few and faint cross-responses to the glycopeptides having other glycans attached even though some of these were structurally very similar to alpha-GalNAc.
The fine specificity of the hybridomas for the peptide moiety was investigated by testing their responses to a panel of Hb(67-76)-alpha-GalNAc glycopeptides with alanine substitutions at all positions except at the two MHC binding anchor positions, I68 and K76, and the T72 to which the alpha-GalNAc was attached.
Glycopeptides substituted with alanine at positions where the amino acid side chain pointed toward the TCR did not stimulate the hybridomas, whereas glycopeptides substituted with alanine at positions orientated down into the MHC binding groove stimulated many of the hybridomas.
These results indicate that the glycan attached to the peptide as well as solvent-accessible parts of the peptide are recognized with a high degree of specificity by the T cells, whereas the parts of the peptide buried in the MHC binding site are less important or totally ignored by the T cells.

Related Results

An attempt to produce “pre‐T” cell hybridomas and to identify their antigens
An attempt to produce “pre‐T” cell hybridomas and to identify their antigens
AbstractWith the aim of identifying some of the stages in the development of pre‐T cells (cells of the T cell lineage before they enter the thymus), we have produced a large number...
Benchmarking Bayesian methods for spectroscopy
Benchmarking Bayesian methods for spectroscopy
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"><strong>Introduction:</strong></span>&l...
Structural Comparison Between MHC Classes I and II; in Evolution, a Class-II-Like Molecule Probably Came First
Structural Comparison Between MHC Classes I and II; in Evolution, a Class-II-Like Molecule Probably Came First
Structures of peptide-loaded major histocompatibility complex class I (pMHC-I) and class II (pMHC-II) complexes are similar. However, whereas pMHC-II complexes include similar-size...
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
Fuze Well Mechanical Interface
<div class="section abstract"> <div class="htmlview paragraph">This interface standard applies to fuzes used in airborne weapons that use a 3-Inch Fuze Well. It defin...
Input of Major Histocompatibility Complex class II immunostaining in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
Input of Major Histocompatibility Complex class II immunostaining in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
AbstractBackgroundIdiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a group of rare acquired muscular diseases. In healthy muscle, myofibers do not express major histocompatibility com...
Differential expression of MHC class II antigens in myelomonocytic leukemia cell lines
Differential expression of MHC class II antigens in myelomonocytic leukemia cell lines
Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II antigens are discordantly expressed on hematopoietic progenitor cells. Their expression is linked to differential responsiveness of ...

Back to Top