Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Abstract 45: Thrombolytic Treatment for In-Hospital Ischemic Strokes in United States

View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND: Despite the recent emphasis on protocols for emergent triage and treatment of in-hospital acute ischemic stroke, there is little data on rates and outcomes of patients receiving thrombolytics for in-hospital ischemic strokes. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of in-hospital ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytics and to compare outcomes with patients treated with thrombolytics on admission. DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed a seven-year data (2002-2009) from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS), a nationally representative inpatient database in the United States. We identified patients who had in-hospital ischemic strokes (defined by thrombolytic treatment after one day of hospitalization) and those who received thrombolytics on the admission day. We compared demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, in hospital complications, length of stay, hospitalization charges, and discharge disposition, between the two patient groups. RESULT: A total of 18036 (21.5%) and 65912 (78.5%) patients received thrombolytics for in-hospital and on admission acute ischemic stroke, respectively. In hospital complications such as pneumonia (5.0% vs. 3.4%, p=0.0006), deep venous thrombosis (1.9% vs. 0.6%, p<0.0001) and pulmonary embolism (0.8% vs. 0.4%, p=0.01) were significantly higher in the in-hospital group compared to on admission thrombolytic treated group. Hospital length of stay and mean hospital charges were not different between the two groups. Patients who had in-hospital strokes had had higher rates of in hospital mortality (12.1% vs. 10.6%, p=0.02). In a multivariate analysis, in-hospital thrombolytic treated group had higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment for age, gender and baseline clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.74-0.95, p=0.008). CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: In current practice, one out of every five acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics is receiving treatment for in-hospital strokes. The higher mortality and complicated hospitalization in such patients needs to be recognized.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 45: Thrombolytic Treatment for In-Hospital Ischemic Strokes in United States
Description:
BACKGROUND: Despite the recent emphasis on protocols for emergent triage and treatment of in-hospital acute ischemic stroke, there is little data on rates and outcomes of patients receiving thrombolytics for in-hospital ischemic strokes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rates of in-hospital ischemic stroke treated with thrombolytics and to compare outcomes with patients treated with thrombolytics on admission.
DESIGN/METHODS: We analyzed a seven-year data (2002-2009) from the National Inpatient Survey (NIS), a nationally representative inpatient database in the United States.
We identified patients who had in-hospital ischemic strokes (defined by thrombolytic treatment after one day of hospitalization) and those who received thrombolytics on the admission day.
We compared demographics, baseline clinical characteristics, in hospital complications, length of stay, hospitalization charges, and discharge disposition, between the two patient groups.
RESULT: A total of 18036 (21.
5%) and 65912 (78.
5%) patients received thrombolytics for in-hospital and on admission acute ischemic stroke, respectively.
In hospital complications such as pneumonia (5.
0% vs.
3.
4%, p=0.
0006), deep venous thrombosis (1.
9% vs.
0.
6%, p<0.
0001) and pulmonary embolism (0.
8% vs.
0.
4%, p=0.
01) were significantly higher in the in-hospital group compared to on admission thrombolytic treated group.
Hospital length of stay and mean hospital charges were not different between the two groups.
Patients who had in-hospital strokes had had higher rates of in hospital mortality (12.
1% vs.
10.
6%, p=0.
02).
In a multivariate analysis, in-hospital thrombolytic treated group had higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment for age, gender and baseline clinical characteristics (odds ratio 0.
84, 95% confidence interval 0.
74-0.
95, p=0.
008).
CONCLUSION/RELEVANCE: In current practice, one out of every five acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics is receiving treatment for in-hospital strokes.
The higher mortality and complicated hospitalization in such patients needs to be recognized.

Related Results

Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Evolution of Antimicrobial Resistance in Community vs. Hospital-Acquired Infections
Abstract Introduction Hospitals are high-risk environments for infections. Despite the global recognition of these pathogens, few studies compare microorganisms from community-acqu...
Comparative Characterization of Candidate Molecular Markers in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Comparative Characterization of Candidate Molecular Markers in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
According to epidemiological studies, the leading cause of morbidity, disability and mortality are cerebrovascular diseases, in particular ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. In rece...
Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of Acute Ischemic Strokes
Accuracy of Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of Acute Ischemic Strokes
Objective: To assess the accuracy of application of diffusion weighted imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of acute onset ischemic strokes. Study Design: Cross sectional valida...
Preconditioning by Preceding Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
Preconditioning by Preceding Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
Background Emerging yet contrasting evidence from animal and human studies associates ischemic preconditioning with improvement of subsequent stroke severity, although ...
Statistics on artificially triggered lightning
Statistics on artificially triggered lightning
The Faculté Polytechnique of Mons has participated in the last three programs of artificially triggered lightning in Saint‐Privat d'Allier, France (1986, 1990, and 1991). Measureme...
Distinct clinical and inflammatory signatures in anterior vs. posterior circulation strokes
Distinct clinical and inflammatory signatures in anterior vs. posterior circulation strokes
Background While clinical differences between anterior (AC) and posterior (PC) circulation strokes are recognized, the underlying biological distinctions remain...

Back to Top