Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Stem cells, pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming

View through CrossRef
The recent demonstration of in vitro reprogramming using transduction of 4 transcription factors by Yamanaka and colleagues represents a major advance in the field. However, major questions regarding the mechanism of in vitro reprogramming need to be understood and will be one focus of the talk. During cellular reprogramming only a small fraction of cells become induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Previous analyses of gene expression during reprogramming were based on populations of cells and impeded identification of events at the single‐cell level. We utilized two different gene expression technologies to profile 48 genes in single cells at various stages during the reprogramming process. Analysis of early stages revealed considerable variation in gene expression between cells in contrast to late stages. We show that Esrrb, Utf1, Lin28, and Dppa2 have a better potential to predict cells that will become iPSCs, compared to Fbxo15, Fgf4, and Oct4, which were previously suggested to be markers of reprogramming. Our data suggest that stochastic gene expression early in reprogramming is followed by a late sequential phase with Sox2 activation upstream in a gene expression hierarchy. Finally, we demonstrate that subsets of downstream factors derived from the sequential phase can activate the pluripotency circuitry. A major impediment in realizing the potential of ES and iPS cells to study human diseases is the inefficiency of gene targeting. Using Zn finger or TALEN mediated genome editing we have established efficient protocols to target expressed and silent genes in human ES and iPS cells. Finally, our progress in using iPS cells for therapy and for the study of complex human diseases will be summarized.
Title: Stem cells, pluripotency and nuclear reprogramming
Description:
The recent demonstration of in vitro reprogramming using transduction of 4 transcription factors by Yamanaka and colleagues represents a major advance in the field.
However, major questions regarding the mechanism of in vitro reprogramming need to be understood and will be one focus of the talk.
During cellular reprogramming only a small fraction of cells become induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).
Previous analyses of gene expression during reprogramming were based on populations of cells and impeded identification of events at the single‐cell level.
We utilized two different gene expression technologies to profile 48 genes in single cells at various stages during the reprogramming process.
Analysis of early stages revealed considerable variation in gene expression between cells in contrast to late stages.
We show that Esrrb, Utf1, Lin28, and Dppa2 have a better potential to predict cells that will become iPSCs, compared to Fbxo15, Fgf4, and Oct4, which were previously suggested to be markers of reprogramming.
Our data suggest that stochastic gene expression early in reprogramming is followed by a late sequential phase with Sox2 activation upstream in a gene expression hierarchy.
Finally, we demonstrate that subsets of downstream factors derived from the sequential phase can activate the pluripotency circuitry.
A major impediment in realizing the potential of ES and iPS cells to study human diseases is the inefficiency of gene targeting.
Using Zn finger or TALEN mediated genome editing we have established efficient protocols to target expressed and silent genes in human ES and iPS cells.
Finally, our progress in using iPS cells for therapy and for the study of complex human diseases will be summarized.

Related Results

Stem cells
Stem cells
What is a stem cell? The term is a combination of ‘cell’ and ‘stem’. A cell is a major category of living thing, while a stem is a site of growth and support for something else. In...
Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
Prediction model construction of mouse stem cell pluripotency using CpG and non-CpG DNA methylation markers
AbstractBackgroundGenome-wide studies of DNA methylation across the epigenetic landscape provide insights into the heterogeneity of pluripotent embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Differe...
Murine melanoma cells incomplete reprogramming using non‐viral vector
Murine melanoma cells incomplete reprogramming using non‐viral vector
AbstractObjectivesThe reprogramming of cancer cells into induced pluripotent stem cells or less aggressive cancer cells can provide a modern platform to study cancer‐related genes ...
FoxO transcription factors actuate the formative pluripotency specific gene expression programme
FoxO transcription factors actuate the formative pluripotency specific gene expression programme
AbstractNaïve pluripotency is sustained by a self-reinforcing gene regulatory network (GRN) comprising core and naïve pluripotency-specific transcription factors (TFs). Upon exitin...
Murine pluripotent stem cells that escape differentiation inside teratomas maintain pluripotency
Murine pluripotent stem cells that escape differentiation inside teratomas maintain pluripotency
Background. Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) offer immense potential as a source for regenerative therapies. The teratoma assay is widely used in the field of stem cells and regenerat...
Partial reprogramming as a therapeutic approach for heart disease: A state‐of‐the‐art review
Partial reprogramming as a therapeutic approach for heart disease: A state‐of‐the‐art review
AbstractHeart disease such as myocardial infarction is the first cause of mortality in all countries. Today, cardiac cell‐based therapy using de novo produced cardiac cells is cons...

Back to Top