Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

From Ancient Greek Logos to European Rationality

View through CrossRef
Because of history, culture, and politics, European identity has its archetypical elements in ancient Greek culture. Ancient Greek philosophy brought Logos to fore and defined it as the crucial problem and the postulate of the human. We translate the Greek term Logos in English as reason or rationality. These terms, however, do not cover the semantic field of Logos since this includes, among other things, order of being, ground, language, argument etc. The juxtaposition of Logos (reason) to myth makes up the matrix of rationalism. Ancient Greek culture, however, was a culture of Logos (reason) as well as of myth and had enough room for forms, gods, and heroes, for science, poetry, and religious festivities. While ancient Greek culture seems to follow the logic of forms, modern European culture follows the logic of things. Plato criticizes myth and, at the same time, he sets out a philosophy of myth. He follows the principle of ‘giving reason’ (logon didonai) about things, as his master Socrates did. He establishes dialogue and defines dialectics as the science of principles and ideas and their relations to the things of this world. Aristotle did not accept Plato’s interpretation of Logos. He considered dialectics only as a theory of argumentation and defined his ‘first philosophy’ or ‘theology’ as the science of highest Being. His program of rationalism is based on ontology and accepts the primordial relation of Logos, life, and order of things. European modernity begins in philosophy with Descartes’ turn to the subject. Descartes defines the main elements of European rationality and their problems. He brings to fore the human subject as the ‘I’ that is free to doubt about everything it can know except itself. Knowledge has to consolidate the power and the mastery of humans over things and nature. Besides, the distinction between soul and body in terms of thinking thing and extended thing does not allow a unique conception of the human. Especially Kant and Hegel attempted to eliminate the impasses of Descartes’ and of Cartesians. While Kant defined freedom as the transcendental idea of reason, Hegel highlighted the reconciliation of spirit and nature. Nowadays there is a confusion regarding rationality. The power of humans over nature and over other humans as nature is increasing. We have lost the measure of our limits. Perhaps we need the ancient Greek grammar of Logos in order to define the measure and the limits of modern European rationality.
Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khacatur Abovyan
Title: From Ancient Greek Logos to European Rationality
Description:
Because of history, culture, and politics, European identity has its archetypical elements in ancient Greek culture.
Ancient Greek philosophy brought Logos to fore and defined it as the crucial problem and the postulate of the human.
We translate the Greek term Logos in English as reason or rationality.
These terms, however, do not cover the semantic field of Logos since this includes, among other things, order of being, ground, language, argument etc.
The juxtaposition of Logos (reason) to myth makes up the matrix of rationalism.
Ancient Greek culture, however, was a culture of Logos (reason) as well as of myth and had enough room for forms, gods, and heroes, for science, poetry, and religious festivities.
While ancient Greek culture seems to follow the logic of forms, modern European culture follows the logic of things.
Plato criticizes myth and, at the same time, he sets out a philosophy of myth.
He follows the principle of ‘giving reason’ (logon didonai) about things, as his master Socrates did.
He establishes dialogue and defines dialectics as the science of principles and ideas and their relations to the things of this world.
Aristotle did not accept Plato’s interpretation of Logos.
He considered dialectics only as a theory of argumentation and defined his ‘first philosophy’ or ‘theology’ as the science of highest Being.
His program of rationalism is based on ontology and accepts the primordial relation of Logos, life, and order of things.
European modernity begins in philosophy with Descartes’ turn to the subject.
Descartes defines the main elements of European rationality and their problems.
He brings to fore the human subject as the ‘I’ that is free to doubt about everything it can know except itself.
Knowledge has to consolidate the power and the mastery of humans over things and nature.
Besides, the distinction between soul and body in terms of thinking thing and extended thing does not allow a unique conception of the human.
Especially Kant and Hegel attempted to eliminate the impasses of Descartes’ and of Cartesians.
While Kant defined freedom as the transcendental idea of reason, Hegel highlighted the reconciliation of spirit and nature.
Nowadays there is a confusion regarding rationality.
The power of humans over nature and over other humans as nature is increasing.
We have lost the measure of our limits.
Perhaps we need the ancient Greek grammar of Logos in order to define the measure and the limits of modern European rationality.

Related Results

Alcohol Recognition and Desire to Drink of Extended Alcohol Brand Logos
Alcohol Recognition and Desire to Drink of Extended Alcohol Brand Logos
Alcohol companies in Thailand have adopted surrogate marketing that uses similar logos on non-alcoholic products. We aimed to assess variations of the alcohol recognition using rea...
The Development of Rationality in Economics
The Development of Rationality in Economics
The concept of rationality first originated from philosophy and later evolved into rationality in economics, and then rationality has been the basic assumption of mainstream econom...
Mengenal Logos berdasarkan Injil Yohanes
Mengenal Logos berdasarkan Injil Yohanes
Terdapat berbagai pandangan serta pemahaman orang Romawi dan Yunani tentang makna dan arti kata Logos yang sering kali hal ini kemudian menimbulkan kekeliruan bahkan adanya penyala...
Kajian Teologis Terhadap Makna Logos Menurut Injil Yohanes
Kajian Teologis Terhadap Makna Logos Menurut Injil Yohanes
Tulisan ini membahas tentang makna Logos pada Yesus dalam Injil Yohanes. Logos merupakan salah satu kunci di dalam agama Kristen. Injil Yohanes merupakan salah satu injil yang men...
MAKNA TEOLOGIS GELAR LOGOS SEBAGAI YESUS DALAM INJIL YOHANES
MAKNA TEOLOGIS GELAR LOGOS SEBAGAI YESUS DALAM INJIL YOHANES
Penelitian ini mencoba buat menjawab perihal konsep teologis gelar logos bagi Yesus menurut injil Yohanes 1 dengan pendekatan teologis . Dimana Yesus di beri gelar oleh Injil Yohan...
Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Pengaruh Filsafat Yunani terhadap Konsep Logos Menurut Injil Yohanes”
Tinjauan Kritis Terhadap Pengaruh Filsafat Yunani terhadap Konsep Logos Menurut Injil Yohanes”
Artikel ini membahas tentang Logos berdasarkan Injil Yohanes dengan menggunakan metode penelitian studi kepustakaan. Kajian mengenai Logos merupakan topik yang hangat diperbincangk...
Do you have the correct brand logo? Role of logo direction, perceived logo movement imagery and brand positioning
Do you have the correct brand logo? Role of logo direction, perceived logo movement imagery and brand positioning
Purpose Previous research has mainly examined the effects of static versus kinematic brand logos on consumer responses. This paper aims to analyze the impact of dynamic brand logos...
Attitudes towards Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek in London’s Greek Cypriot community
Attitudes towards Cypriot Greek and Standard Modern Greek in London’s Greek Cypriot community
Aim: To investigate whether the positive attitudes towards Standard Modern Greek and the mixture of positive and negative attitudes towards Cypriot Greek that h...

Back to Top