Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Early versus delayed feeding after push-technique percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A randomized controlled trial
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background and Aims
Traditional guidelines recommend delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) because of concerns about postprocedural complications. Early feeding is safe after pull-technique PEG; however, optimal timing after push-technique PEG remains uncertain. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of early vs delayed feeding after push-technique PEG, focusing on maximal gastric residual volume, complications, and wound site bacterial colonization.
Methods
A randomized noninferiority trial was conducted at a university hospital in 160 patients undergoing successful push-technique PEG placement between February 2022 and June 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to early feeding (<4 hours) or delayed feeding (>12 hours). Both groups received identical intermittent drip-feeding protocols. The primary outcome was maximal gastric residual volume. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, opioid consumption, postprocedural complications, and wound culture.
Results
Median time to feeding was 2.2 hours (0.7–4.0) in the early group and 17.2 hours (12.8–40.5) in the delayed group. Maximal gastric residual volume did not differ between groups (0 vs 0 mL;
P
=0.26). Early feeding reduced hospital stay (42.3 vs 46.0 hours;
P
<0.01) and opioid use (2.0 [0–10] vs 2.0 [0–12] mg;
P
=0.01). Rates of complications (fever, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal distension) were comparable (20.0% vs 27.5%;
P
=0.35). Wound cultures showed no significant difference in bacterial colonization (26.3% vs 22.5%;
P
=0.58).
Conclusions
Early enteral feeding within 4 hours after push-technique PEG is safe, does not impair gastric emptying, and reduces hospital stay and opioid use. These findings extend the evidence for early feeding to push-technique procedures.
Trial Registration
Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Registration number TCTR20220105003. Web link:
https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220105003
.
Title: Early versus delayed feeding after push-technique percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A randomized controlled trial
Description:
Abstract
Background and Aims
Traditional guidelines recommend delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) because of concerns about postprocedural complications.
Early feeding is safe after pull-technique PEG; however, optimal timing after push-technique PEG remains uncertain.
We evaluated the safety and efficacy of early vs delayed feeding after push-technique PEG, focusing on maximal gastric residual volume, complications, and wound site bacterial colonization.
Methods
A randomized noninferiority trial was conducted at a university hospital in 160 patients undergoing successful push-technique PEG placement between February 2022 and June 2023.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to early feeding (<4 hours) or delayed feeding (>12 hours).
Both groups received identical intermittent drip-feeding protocols.
The primary outcome was maximal gastric residual volume.
Secondary outcomes were length of stay, opioid consumption, postprocedural complications, and wound culture.
Results
Median time to feeding was 2.
2 hours (0.
7–4.
0) in the early group and 17.
2 hours (12.
8–40.
5) in the delayed group.
Maximal gastric residual volume did not differ between groups (0 vs 0 mL;
P
=0.
26).
Early feeding reduced hospital stay (42.
3 vs 46.
0 hours;
P
<0.
01) and opioid use (2.
0 [0–10] vs 2.
0 [0–12] mg;
P
=0.
01).
Rates of complications (fever, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal distension) were comparable (20.
0% vs 27.
5%;
P
=0.
35).
Wound cultures showed no significant difference in bacterial colonization (26.
3% vs 22.
5%;
P
=0.
58).
Conclusions
Early enteral feeding within 4 hours after push-technique PEG is safe, does not impair gastric emptying, and reduces hospital stay and opioid use.
These findings extend the evidence for early feeding to push-technique procedures.
Trial Registration
Thai Clinical Trials Registry.
Registration number TCTR20220105003.
Web link:
https://www.
thaiclinicaltrials.
org/show/TCTR20220105003
.
Related Results
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) with fluoroscopic guidance using push technique: safety and efficacy
Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) with fluoroscopic guidance using push technique: safety and efficacy
Abstract
Purpose
For individuals who cannot accept oral intake, gastrostomy catheters offer an alternate method of feeding access. Since the development of image-guided pro...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Routine practice after bowel anastomoses has been to keep patient nil per oral till the return of bowel sound with a belief that this will prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting...
Assessing the Dependence of Feeding Gastrostomy Tube in Patients of Head and Neck Carcinomas
Assessing the Dependence of Feeding Gastrostomy Tube in Patients of Head and Neck Carcinomas
Objective: To investigate the dependency on feeding gastrostomy tubes in patients with head and neck cancers treated with radiotherapy alone or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy.
Stud...
Comparison of the clinical outcome of endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and microscopic overlay myringoplasty: matching co-variated designs
Comparison of the clinical outcome of endoscopic push-through myringoplasty and microscopic overlay myringoplasty: matching co-variated designs
Abstract
Background
The conventional microscopic overlayer myringoplasty is preferred because it allows a both hands technique, not reducing middle ...
Ergonomic injuries in endoscopic doctors, nurses and technicians.
Ergonomic injuries in endoscopic doctors, nurses and technicians.
Objective: To determine the frequency of ergonomic injuries in endoscopic and non-endoscopic healthcare professionals and clinical staff. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setti...
Evaluation of MAHD (Minimum Acceptable Hygienic Diet) As a New Composite IYCF Feeding Indicator to Assess the Appropriateness of Complementary Feeding
Evaluation of MAHD (Minimum Acceptable Hygienic Diet) As a New Composite IYCF Feeding Indicator to Assess the Appropriateness of Complementary Feeding
Abstract
Background-Development of feeding indicators to assess the appropriateness of complementary feeding practices of mothers has been a major area of research in preve...

