Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Early versus delayed feeding after push-technique percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A randomized controlled trial

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background and Aims Traditional guidelines recommend delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) because of concerns about postprocedural complications. Early feeding is safe after pull-technique PEG; however, optimal timing after push-technique PEG remains uncertain. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of early vs delayed feeding after push-technique PEG, focusing on maximal gastric residual volume, complications, and wound site bacterial colonization. Methods A randomized noninferiority trial was conducted at a university hospital in 160 patients undergoing successful push-technique PEG placement between February 2022 and June 2023. Patients were randomized 1:1 to early feeding (<4 hours) or delayed feeding (>12 hours). Both groups received identical intermittent drip-feeding protocols. The primary outcome was maximal gastric residual volume. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, opioid consumption, postprocedural complications, and wound culture. Results Median time to feeding was 2.2 hours (0.7–4.0) in the early group and 17.2 hours (12.8–40.5) in the delayed group. Maximal gastric residual volume did not differ between groups (0 vs 0 mL; P =0.26). Early feeding reduced hospital stay (42.3 vs 46.0 hours; P <0.01) and opioid use (2.0 [0–10] vs 2.0 [0–12] mg; P =0.01). Rates of complications (fever, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal distension) were comparable (20.0% vs 27.5%; P =0.35). Wound cultures showed no significant difference in bacterial colonization (26.3% vs 22.5%; P =0.58). Conclusions Early enteral feeding within 4 hours after push-technique PEG is safe, does not impair gastric emptying, and reduces hospital stay and opioid use. These findings extend the evidence for early feeding to push-technique procedures. Trial Registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Registration number TCTR20220105003. Web link: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20220105003 .
Title: Early versus delayed feeding after push-technique percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: A randomized controlled trial
Description:
Abstract Background and Aims Traditional guidelines recommend delayed feeding after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) because of concerns about postprocedural complications.
Early feeding is safe after pull-technique PEG; however, optimal timing after push-technique PEG remains uncertain.
We evaluated the safety and efficacy of early vs delayed feeding after push-technique PEG, focusing on maximal gastric residual volume, complications, and wound site bacterial colonization.
Methods A randomized noninferiority trial was conducted at a university hospital in 160 patients undergoing successful push-technique PEG placement between February 2022 and June 2023.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to early feeding (<4 hours) or delayed feeding (>12 hours).
Both groups received identical intermittent drip-feeding protocols.
The primary outcome was maximal gastric residual volume.
Secondary outcomes were length of stay, opioid consumption, postprocedural complications, and wound culture.
Results Median time to feeding was 2.
2 hours (0.
7–4.
0) in the early group and 17.
2 hours (12.
8–40.
5) in the delayed group.
Maximal gastric residual volume did not differ between groups (0 vs 0 mL; P =0.
26).
Early feeding reduced hospital stay (42.
3 vs 46.
0 hours; P <0.
01) and opioid use (2.
0 [0–10] vs 2.
0 [0–12] mg; P =0.
01).
Rates of complications (fever, bleeding, wound infection, abdominal distension) were comparable (20.
0% vs 27.
5%; P =0.
35).
Wound cultures showed no significant difference in bacterial colonization (26.
3% vs 22.
5%; P =0.
58).
Conclusions Early enteral feeding within 4 hours after push-technique PEG is safe, does not impair gastric emptying, and reduces hospital stay and opioid use.
These findings extend the evidence for early feeding to push-technique procedures.
Trial Registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry.
Registration number TCTR20220105003.
Web link: https://www.
thaiclinicaltrials.
org/show/TCTR20220105003 .

Related Results

International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
  Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) with fluoroscopic guidance using push  technique: safety and efficacy
  Percutaneous radiological gastrostomy (PRG) with fluoroscopic guidance using push  technique: safety and efficacy
Abstract Purpose For individuals who cannot accept oral intake, gastrostomy catheters offer an alternate method of feeding access. Since the development of image-guided pro...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Early Enteral Feeding Versus Delayed Enteral Nutrition: Effects On Morbidity After Intestinal Surgery; A Prospective Study
Routine practice after bowel anastomoses has been to keep patient nil per oral till the return of bowel sound with a belief that this will prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting...
Assessing the Dependence of Feeding Gastrostomy Tube in Patients of Head and Neck Carcinomas
Assessing the Dependence of Feeding Gastrostomy Tube in Patients of Head and Neck Carcinomas
Objective: To investigate the dependency on feeding gastrostomy tubes in patients with head and neck cancers treated with radiotherapy alone or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Stud...
Ergonomic injuries in endoscopic doctors, nurses and technicians.
Ergonomic injuries in endoscopic doctors, nurses and technicians.
Objective: To determine the frequency of ergonomic injuries in endoscopic and non-endoscopic healthcare professionals and clinical staff. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setti...

Back to Top