Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Sequential Failures in Incident Investigation Process Hindering Prevention of Incidents
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Over the last 10 years, Oil & Gas operations have come under tremendous pressures due to increasing production demands and economic conditions, demanding higher performance and venturing into technically challenging operating conditions. Operating with aging facilities in harsh environmental conditions and higher crew turnaround, have resulted in higher number of serious incidents. Prevention of incidents remains high on the agenda of oil & gas companies and focus is placed on incident investigations to identify root causes of incidents and development of corrective actions. However, repetition of incidents with similar findings and causes have been observed, raising concerns if right root causes were identified and focused corrective actions were identified and/or implemented.
An extended analysis of over one thousand (1000) incidents was conducted to assess degree of repetition of causes and regrouping of causes to assess linkage of human factors with organizational behaviours. It was found that 31% of incidents were triggered by human errors & mistakes whilst 27% were attributed to violations. All violations were deemed as intentional & routine and further investigation was not undertaken. Management Supervion & Employees Leadership was identified a leading root cause category of incidents and this category contributed 20% of incidents followed by Work Planning (18%) and behaviour (12%). 55 % of incidents were caused by human factors and hauman factors were triggered by errors and mistakes rather than violations.
Often efforts are exerted to to influence individual's behaviour however human attitude (cognitive, emotional and commitment) is overlooked as linkage between attitude change leading to behavior change, not fully explored. However, linkage from behavior change to attitude change is much stronger. If worker consciously change their behavior, it requires re adjustment of associated attitudes to align with the new behavior. Positive reinforcement is an effective tool to influence individual's behaviour. If discipline and punishment are used to discourage unsafe behavior, the intended results are not achieved (e.g., incident or near miss are not reported for fear of sanctions).
Assessment of non-compliant behaviors (Violations, mistakes and errors) & conditions and factors influencing such behaviors are often not evaluated and focused action plans to address abilities and motivations with due consideration to isolated or systemic conditions are instrumental in preventing incicidents.
Title: Sequential Failures in Incident Investigation Process Hindering Prevention of Incidents
Description:
Abstract
Over the last 10 years, Oil & Gas operations have come under tremendous pressures due to increasing production demands and economic conditions, demanding higher performance and venturing into technically challenging operating conditions.
Operating with aging facilities in harsh environmental conditions and higher crew turnaround, have resulted in higher number of serious incidents.
Prevention of incidents remains high on the agenda of oil & gas companies and focus is placed on incident investigations to identify root causes of incidents and development of corrective actions.
However, repetition of incidents with similar findings and causes have been observed, raising concerns if right root causes were identified and focused corrective actions were identified and/or implemented.
An extended analysis of over one thousand (1000) incidents was conducted to assess degree of repetition of causes and regrouping of causes to assess linkage of human factors with organizational behaviours.
It was found that 31% of incidents were triggered by human errors & mistakes whilst 27% were attributed to violations.
All violations were deemed as intentional & routine and further investigation was not undertaken.
Management Supervion & Employees Leadership was identified a leading root cause category of incidents and this category contributed 20% of incidents followed by Work Planning (18%) and behaviour (12%).
55 % of incidents were caused by human factors and hauman factors were triggered by errors and mistakes rather than violations.
Often efforts are exerted to to influence individual's behaviour however human attitude (cognitive, emotional and commitment) is overlooked as linkage between attitude change leading to behavior change, not fully explored.
However, linkage from behavior change to attitude change is much stronger.
If worker consciously change their behavior, it requires re adjustment of associated attitudes to align with the new behavior.
Positive reinforcement is an effective tool to influence individual's behaviour.
If discipline and punishment are used to discourage unsafe behavior, the intended results are not achieved (e.
g.
, incident or near miss are not reported for fear of sanctions).
Assessment of non-compliant behaviors (Violations, mistakes and errors) & conditions and factors influencing such behaviors are often not evaluated and focused action plans to address abilities and motivations with due consideration to isolated or systemic conditions are instrumental in preventing incicidents.
Related Results
Patient Safety Incident Reporting Behaviour and Associated Factor sAmong Nurses Working in Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2024) (Preprint)
Patient Safety Incident Reporting Behaviour and Associated Factor sAmong Nurses Working in Public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (2024) (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Background
The health care delivery system is a complicated, by design and prone to errors with many medical practices and risks in the system e...
Managing Human Error by Managing the Work Environment
Managing Human Error by Managing the Work Environment
Abstract
This paper will discuss the role of human error in the incident causation process and indicate what the most effective means to identify and manage human...
An International Comparison of the Instigation and Design of Health Registers in the Epidemiological Response to Major Environmental Health Incidents
An International Comparison of the Instigation and Design of Health Registers in the Epidemiological Response to Major Environmental Health Incidents
Context:
Epidemiological preparedness is vital in providing relevant, transparent, and timely intelligence for the management, mitigation, and prevention of public heal...
Statin Use, Incident Dementia and Alzheimer Disease in Elderly African Americans
Statin Use, Incident Dementia and Alzheimer Disease in Elderly African Americans
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the association between statin use, incident dementia, and Alzheimer disease (AD) in a prospective elderly African A...
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SCHOOL ROLE PLAYERS IN ADDRESSING CYBER INCIDENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES FOR SCHOOL ROLE PLAYERS IN ADDRESSING CYBER INCIDENTS IN SOUTH AFRICA
Cyber incidents are causing major challenges for school officials who are called upon to respond to these incidents involving learners, globally. Online threats take place off the ...
Gewaltvorfälle in Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege – Zahlen aus der Unfallanzeigen-Statistik der Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW)
Gewaltvorfälle in Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege – Zahlen aus der Unfallanzeigen-Statistik der Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW)
Incidents of violence in health services and welfare – Figures from the Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW)
Aim: The German social accident insur...
Intimidation or harassment among family medicine residents in Saskatchewan: a cross-sectional survey
Intimidation or harassment among family medicine residents in Saskatchewan: a cross-sectional survey
Introduction: Up to 98% of practicing family physicians, and over 75% of resident physicians in Canada experience abusive incidents. Despite the negative consequences of abusive in...
Incident Analysis using the Root Cause (Tripod Beta) Methodology-An SPDC Experience
Incident Analysis using the Root Cause (Tripod Beta) Methodology-An SPDC Experience
Abstract
The Root cause analysis, called the Tripod Beta, is an approach to the analysis of incidents using the Tripod theory of Accident causation and the hazard an...

