Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems and surface treatments on the integrity of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces after partial removal of preexisting resin composites using quantitative image analysis for microleakage testing protocol. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 human molar teeth were restored with either of the resin composites (Filtek Z250/GrandioSO) occlusally. The teeth were thermocycled (1000×). Mesial and distal 1/3 parts of the restorations were removed out leaving only middle part. One side of the cavity was finished with course diamond bur and the other was air-abraded with 50 μm Al2O3. They were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) to receive: Group 1: Adper Single Bond 2; Group 2: All Bond 3; Group 3: ClearfilSE; Group 4: BeautiBond, before being repaired with the same resin composite (Filtek Z250). The specimens were re-thermocycled (1000×), sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin, sectioned mesiodistally and photographed digitally. The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis software (ImageJ) for both bur-finished and air-abraded surfaces at resin-tooth and resin-resin interfaces. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: BeautiBond exhibited the most microleakage at every site. Irrespective of adhesive and initial composite type, air-abrasion showed less microleakage except for BeautiBond. The type of initial repaired restorative material did not affect the microleakage. BeautiBond adhesive may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention. Conclusions: Surface treatment with air-abrasion produced the lowest microleakage scores, independent of the adhesive systems and the pre-existing resin composite type. Pre-existing composite type does not affect the microleakage issue. All-in-one adhesive resin (BeautiBond) may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Title: Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments
Description:
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems and surface treatments on the integrity of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces after partial removal of preexisting resin composites using quantitative image analysis for microleakage testing protocol.
Materials and Methods: A total of 80 human molar teeth were restored with either of the resin composites (Filtek Z250/GrandioSO) occlusally.
The teeth were thermocycled (1000×).
Mesial and distal 1/3 parts of the restorations were removed out leaving only middle part.
One side of the cavity was finished with course diamond bur and the other was air-abraded with 50 μm Al2O3.
They were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) to receive: Group 1: Adper Single Bond 2; Group 2: All Bond 3; Group 3: ClearfilSE; Group 4: BeautiBond, before being repaired with the same resin composite (Filtek Z250).
The specimens were re-thermocycled (1000×), sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.
5% basic fuchsin, sectioned mesiodistally and photographed digitally.
The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis software (ImageJ) for both bur-finished and air-abraded surfaces at resin-tooth and resin-resin interfaces.
The data were analyzed statistically.
Results: BeautiBond exhibited the most microleakage at every site.
Irrespective of adhesive and initial composite type, air-abrasion showed less microleakage except for BeautiBond.
The type of initial repaired restorative material did not affect the microleakage.
BeautiBond adhesive may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Conclusions: Surface treatment with air-abrasion produced the lowest microleakage scores, independent of the adhesive systems and the pre-existing resin composite type.
Pre-existing composite type does not affect the microleakage issue.
All-in-one adhesive resin (BeautiBond) may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Related Results
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the microleakage of Pedo Jacket crowns compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs) cemented with different luting cements.
Materials and Metho...
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
Objectives: Pit and fissure sealants are recognized as an effective preventive approach in pediatric dentistry. Composite resin is the most commonly used sealant material. Adding n...
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
Adhesion of Resin-Resin and Resin–Lithium Disilicate Ceramic: A Methodological Assessment
The aim of this study was to evaluate four test methods on the adhesion of resin composite to resin composite, and resin composite to glass ceramic. Resin composite specimens (N = ...
Influence of core materials in the microleakage of cast crowns
Influence of core materials in the microleakage of cast crowns
Endodontically treated teeth can be restored with prosthetic crowns over cast metal cores or prefabricated posts with composite resin cores. Prosthetic failure is frequently observ...
Restoration of human tooth enamel
Restoration of human tooth enamel
AbstractHuman tooth enamel, consisting of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals (∼85–88 vol%), proteins (∼2‐3 vol%), and requisite water (∼10–12 vol%), is 1–3 mm thick at the outer layer of ...
Does Composite Repair Time Affect Repair Protocol, Immediate or Delayed?
Does Composite Repair Time Affect Repair Protocol, Immediate or Delayed?
Abstract
Background:
Composite resin restorations frequently require repair due to fractures, marginal defects, or esthetic fai...
Detection of pit and fissure sealant microleakage using autofluorescence
Detection of pit and fissure sealant microleakage using autofluorescence
Abstract
Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of detecting the presence and severity of microleakage of pit and fissure sealant using Quantitat...
TRATAMENTO CIRÚRGICO DE CANINO INCLUSO EM REGIÃO MENTUAL: RELATO DE CASO
TRATAMENTO CIRÚRGICO DE CANINO INCLUSO EM REGIÃO MENTUAL: RELATO DE CASO
RESUMOO dente denominado incluso nada mais é que um dente retido ou impactado dentro do alvéolo dentário de maneira parcial ou completa que não conseguiu erupcionar por motivos pat...

