Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments
View through CrossRef
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems and surface treatments on the integrity of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces after partial removal of preexisting resin composites using quantitative image analysis for microleakage testing protocol. Materials and Methods: A total of 80 human molar teeth were restored with either of the resin composites (Filtek Z250/GrandioSO) occlusally. The teeth were thermocycled (1000×). Mesial and distal 1/3 parts of the restorations were removed out leaving only middle part. One side of the cavity was finished with course diamond bur and the other was air-abraded with 50 μm Al2O3. They were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) to receive: Group 1: Adper Single Bond 2; Group 2: All Bond 3; Group 3: ClearfilSE; Group 4: BeautiBond, before being repaired with the same resin composite (Filtek Z250). The specimens were re-thermocycled (1000×), sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin, sectioned mesiodistally and photographed digitally. The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis software (ImageJ) for both bur-finished and air-abraded surfaces at resin-tooth and resin-resin interfaces. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: BeautiBond exhibited the most microleakage at every site. Irrespective of adhesive and initial composite type, air-abrasion showed less microleakage except for BeautiBond. The type of initial repaired restorative material did not affect the microleakage. BeautiBond adhesive may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention. Conclusions: Surface treatment with air-abrasion produced the lowest microleakage scores, independent of the adhesive systems and the pre-existing resin composite type. Pre-existing composite type does not affect the microleakage issue. All-in-one adhesive resin (BeautiBond) may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Title: Resin composite repair: Quantitative microleakage evaluation of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces with different surface treatments
Description:
ABSTRACT
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of different adhesive systems and surface treatments on the integrity of resin-resin and resin-tooth interfaces after partial removal of preexisting resin composites using quantitative image analysis for microleakage testing protocol.
Materials and Methods: A total of 80 human molar teeth were restored with either of the resin composites (Filtek Z250/GrandioSO) occlusally.
The teeth were thermocycled (1000×).
Mesial and distal 1/3 parts of the restorations were removed out leaving only middle part.
One side of the cavity was finished with course diamond bur and the other was air-abraded with 50 μm Al2O3.
They were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) to receive: Group 1: Adper Single Bond 2; Group 2: All Bond 3; Group 3: ClearfilSE; Group 4: BeautiBond, before being repaired with the same resin composite (Filtek Z250).
The specimens were re-thermocycled (1000×), sealed with nail varnish, stained with 0.
5% basic fuchsin, sectioned mesiodistally and photographed digitally.
The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis software (ImageJ) for both bur-finished and air-abraded surfaces at resin-tooth and resin-resin interfaces.
The data were analyzed statistically.
Results: BeautiBond exhibited the most microleakage at every site.
Irrespective of adhesive and initial composite type, air-abrasion showed less microleakage except for BeautiBond.
The type of initial repaired restorative material did not affect the microleakage.
BeautiBond adhesive may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Conclusions: Surface treatment with air-abrasion produced the lowest microleakage scores, independent of the adhesive systems and the pre-existing resin composite type.
Pre-existing composite type does not affect the microleakage issue.
All-in-one adhesive resin (BeautiBond) may not be preferred in resin composite repair in terms of microleakage prevention.
Related Results
A Microleakage Study of Various Dental Fillers (Nanohydroxyapatite, Bioactive Glass and Nanohydroxyapatite/Bioactive Glass) for Dental Restoration
A Microleakage Study of Various Dental Fillers (Nanohydroxyapatite, Bioactive Glass and Nanohydroxyapatite/Bioactive Glass) for Dental Restoration
Microleakage has been considered a common issue in dental restorations, leading to secondary or recurrent caries. One approach to addressing microleakage in dental cements focuses ...
Evaluation of the Influence of Three different Temperatures on Microleakage of Two Self-etch and One Total-etch Adhesives
Evaluation of the Influence of Three different Temperatures on Microleakage of Two Self-etch and One Total-etch Adhesives
ABSTRACT
Aim
To evaluate the bonding temperature effect on dentinrestoration microleakage.
The null hypothesis of the study is that the score of microleakage is identical among di...
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
Comparison of Microleakage of Pedo Jacket Crowns and Stainless Steel Crowns Cemented with Different Cements
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the microleakage of Pedo Jacket crowns compared to stainless steel crowns (SSCs) cemented with different luting cements.
Materials and Metho...
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy
Objectives: Pit and fissure sealants are recognized as an effective preventive approach in pediatric dentistry. Composite resin is the most commonly used sealant material. Adding n...
Microleakage of bulk fill polymer-based composite: review of the literature
Microleakage of bulk fill polymer-based composite: review of the literature
Currently, the most widely used dental restoration materials in the field of dental aesthetics are polymer-based composite; therefore, the offer within the market is increasing wit...
Microleakage of luting cements in CAD/CAM pediatric zirconia crowns: An in vitro study
Microleakage of luting cements in CAD/CAM pediatric zirconia crowns: An in vitro study
Abstract
Objectives To assess and compare the microleakage of custom-made zirconia crowns (CZCs) and prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary maxillary incisors when...
NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS
NONLINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS USING ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE SHELLS
This paper presents the results of the geometric nonlinear analysis of composite shell subjected to static load by using an edge-based smoothed finite elements (ES) and the mixed i...
Differences of Microleakage Between Pit and Fissure Sealant Materials Composite Resin and RMGIC
Differences of Microleakage Between Pit and Fissure Sealant Materials Composite Resin and RMGIC
The shape of deep and narrow pits and fissures can be a place of retention for both bacteria and debris and if this condition is left untreated, it can develop into caries. Effecti...

