Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Adolescent distinctions between quality of life and self-rated health in quality of life research

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background In adult quality of life (QOL) research, the QOL construct appears to differ from self-rated health status. Although increased QOL continues to be recognized as an important outcome in health promotion and medical intervention, little research has attempted to explore adolescent perceptual differences between self-rated health and QOL. Methods Correlational analyses were performed between self-rated health, physical health days and mental health days, and QOL. Data were collected from two different public high school adolescent samples during two different time periods (1997 & 2003) in two different geographic regions in the USA (a southern & midwestern state) with two different sample sizes (N = 5,220 and N = 140, respectively) using the CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS). The Centers for Disease Control and Preventions' health-related quality of life scale (HRQOL) provided estimates of self-rated health, physical health days and mental health days, and QOL. Results All correlation coefficients were significant in both samples (p ≤ .0001), suggesting sample size was not a contributing factor to the significant correlations. In both samples, adolescent QOL ratings were more strongly correlated with the mean number of poor mental health days (r = .88, southern sample; r = .89, midwestern sample) than with the mean number of poor physical health days (r = .75, southern sample; r = .79, midwestern sample), consistent with adult QOL research. However, correlation coefficients in both samples between self-rated health and the mean number of poor physical health days was slightly smaller (r = .24, southern, r = .32, midwestern) than that between self-rated health and the mean number of poor mental health days (r = .25, southern, r = .39 midwestern), which is contrary to adult QOL research. Conclusion Similar to adults, these results suggest adolescents are rating two distinct constructs, and that self-rated health and QOL should not be used interchangeably. QOL, in the context of public high school adolescents, is based largely upon self-reported mental health and to a lesser extent on self-reported physical health. Conversely, although self-reported mental health and self-reported physical health both contribute significantly to adolescent self-rated health, mental health appears to make a greater contribution, which is contrary to observations with adults. Health promoting efforts for adolescents may need to focus more on mental health than physical health, when considering population needs and type of micro or macro intervention.
Title: Adolescent distinctions between quality of life and self-rated health in quality of life research
Description:
Abstract Background In adult quality of life (QOL) research, the QOL construct appears to differ from self-rated health status.
Although increased QOL continues to be recognized as an important outcome in health promotion and medical intervention, little research has attempted to explore adolescent perceptual differences between self-rated health and QOL.
Methods Correlational analyses were performed between self-rated health, physical health days and mental health days, and QOL.
Data were collected from two different public high school adolescent samples during two different time periods (1997 & 2003) in two different geographic regions in the USA (a southern & midwestern state) with two different sample sizes (N = 5,220 and N = 140, respectively) using the CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS).
The Centers for Disease Control and Preventions' health-related quality of life scale (HRQOL) provided estimates of self-rated health, physical health days and mental health days, and QOL.
Results All correlation coefficients were significant in both samples (p ≤ .
0001), suggesting sample size was not a contributing factor to the significant correlations.
In both samples, adolescent QOL ratings were more strongly correlated with the mean number of poor mental health days (r = .
88, southern sample; r = .
89, midwestern sample) than with the mean number of poor physical health days (r = .
75, southern sample; r = .
79, midwestern sample), consistent with adult QOL research.
However, correlation coefficients in both samples between self-rated health and the mean number of poor physical health days was slightly smaller (r = .
24, southern, r = .
32, midwestern) than that between self-rated health and the mean number of poor mental health days (r = .
25, southern, r = .
39 midwestern), which is contrary to adult QOL research.
Conclusion Similar to adults, these results suggest adolescents are rating two distinct constructs, and that self-rated health and QOL should not be used interchangeably.
QOL, in the context of public high school adolescents, is based largely upon self-reported mental health and to a lesser extent on self-reported physical health.
Conversely, although self-reported mental health and self-reported physical health both contribute significantly to adolescent self-rated health, mental health appears to make a greater contribution, which is contrary to observations with adults.
Health promoting efforts for adolescents may need to focus more on mental health than physical health, when considering population needs and type of micro or macro intervention.

Related Results

Individual and organizational characteristics predicting intervention use for children with autism in schools
Individual and organizational characteristics predicting intervention use for children with autism in schools
Several interventions have demonstrated efficacy in improving social outcomes for children with autism, but they often are not used in schools. This study examined individual and o...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
The Automedial Zaniness of Ryan Trecartin
IntroductionThe American artist Ryan Trecartin makes digital videos that centre on the self-presentations common to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. Named by New Yorker critic ...
Network structures and temporal stability of self- and informant-rated affective symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease
Network structures and temporal stability of self- and informant-rated affective symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease
Background: Affective symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can be rated with both informant- and self-ratings. Information from these two modalities may not converge. We estimated ...
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Poor housing is associated with poor health. This suggests that improving housing conditions might lead to improved health for residents. This review searched widely for studies fr...
Social Capital is Positively Associated with Self-rated Health Among Chinese Adolescents
Social Capital is Positively Associated with Self-rated Health Among Chinese Adolescents
Abstract Background This study examines the relationship between self-rated health and social capital among Chinese adolescents and aims to understand the influence of fam...

Back to Top