Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

P-548 IMPORTANCE OF EXPANDED CARRIER SCREENING AMONG OOCYTE DONORS - questions and concerns

View through CrossRef
Abstract Study question To examine the utility of a range of expanded screening panels for oocyte donors. Summary answer Expanded carrier screening with NGS data identified that 86% of gamete donors were carriers of at least one condition while 302 genes were tested. What is known already The level of genetic testing for oocyte donors is not regulated in most countries. The use of expanded carrier screening is recommended more widely. If the egg donor is a carrier, there is a 50% chance that the offspring will also be carriers. Expanded carrier screening is performed to determine the potential effects of positive carrier status, which guarantees safety for future pregnancy. From practical experience, more genes are tested for a donor, more potential mutations are detected. Study design, size, duration A cohort of 92 potential oocyte donor applicants aged 18-30 years old, who were qualified for oocyte donation after full screening, tested negative on an initial cystic fibrosis carrier test for 11 most common CFTR mutations (PCR panel), was further screened with expanded commercial carrier testing panel (302 genes) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Participants/materials, setting, methods A cohort of 92 potential oocyte donor applicants aged 18-30 years old, who tested negative on an initial cystic fibrosis carrier test for 11 most common CFTR mutations (PCR panel), was further screened with expanded commercial carrier testing panel (302 genes) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Main results and the role of chance Genotyping results for all donors were analyzed; 38% (35/92) of donors were identified as carriers for one condition, 34% (31/92)- for two conditions, 7% (6/92)- for three conditions and 7% (6/92)- for four conditions, including cystic fibrosis. Among the most prevalent conditions in our study were: Hemochromatosis: Type 1: HFE Related- 22%, Cystic Fibrosis: CFTR-related conditions 11%, Biotinidase deficiency– 7,6%, 21-Hydroxilase-Deficient Congenital Nonclassical Adrenal Hyperplasia- 6,5%, Krabbe disease – 6,5%, Usher syndrome: USH2A-related conditions – 6,5%, Nonsyndromic deafness: GJB2- related conditions- 5,4% and Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (5,4%). Limitations, reasons for caution Each donor was consented for genetic testing Wider implications of the findings This study shows a need to provide the explicit requirement for oocyte donor genetic testing and guidelines to satisfy quality and safety and not reduce the number of donors carries of mutations, but to implement a practice of genetic matching. Trial registration number not applicable
Title: P-548 IMPORTANCE OF EXPANDED CARRIER SCREENING AMONG OOCYTE DONORS - questions and concerns
Description:
Abstract Study question To examine the utility of a range of expanded screening panels for oocyte donors.
Summary answer Expanded carrier screening with NGS data identified that 86% of gamete donors were carriers of at least one condition while 302 genes were tested.
What is known already The level of genetic testing for oocyte donors is not regulated in most countries.
The use of expanded carrier screening is recommended more widely.
If the egg donor is a carrier, there is a 50% chance that the offspring will also be carriers.
Expanded carrier screening is performed to determine the potential effects of positive carrier status, which guarantees safety for future pregnancy.
From practical experience, more genes are tested for a donor, more potential mutations are detected.
Study design, size, duration A cohort of 92 potential oocyte donor applicants aged 18-30 years old, who were qualified for oocyte donation after full screening, tested negative on an initial cystic fibrosis carrier test for 11 most common CFTR mutations (PCR panel), was further screened with expanded commercial carrier testing panel (302 genes) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data.
Participants/materials, setting, methods A cohort of 92 potential oocyte donor applicants aged 18-30 years old, who tested negative on an initial cystic fibrosis carrier test for 11 most common CFTR mutations (PCR panel), was further screened with expanded commercial carrier testing panel (302 genes) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data.
Main results and the role of chance Genotyping results for all donors were analyzed; 38% (35/92) of donors were identified as carriers for one condition, 34% (31/92)- for two conditions, 7% (6/92)- for three conditions and 7% (6/92)- for four conditions, including cystic fibrosis.
Among the most prevalent conditions in our study were: Hemochromatosis: Type 1: HFE Related- 22%, Cystic Fibrosis: CFTR-related conditions 11%, Biotinidase deficiency– 7,6%, 21-Hydroxilase-Deficient Congenital Nonclassical Adrenal Hyperplasia- 6,5%, Krabbe disease – 6,5%, Usher syndrome: USH2A-related conditions – 6,5%, Nonsyndromic deafness: GJB2- related conditions- 5,4% and Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome (5,4%).
Limitations, reasons for caution Each donor was consented for genetic testing Wider implications of the findings This study shows a need to provide the explicit requirement for oocyte donor genetic testing and guidelines to satisfy quality and safety and not reduce the number of donors carries of mutations, but to implement a practice of genetic matching.
Trial registration number not applicable.

Related Results

O-059 ntermetabolites of cholesterol synthesis in granulosa cell and oocyte aging
O-059 ntermetabolites of cholesterol synthesis in granulosa cell and oocyte aging
Abstract With the development of society, there has been a significant delay in female fertility and an increasing desire for c...
Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Follow-up of 12,559 Unrelated Donors of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells or Bone Marrow
Abstract Abstract 365 Donor follow-up is indicated to detect potential long-term risks for allogeneic stem cell donors. We sent a follow-up questionna...
Gamete donors’ motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study
Gamete donors’ motivation in a Swedish national sample: is there any ambivalence? A descriptive study
Abstract Objective. To study donors’ motivation and ambivalence before donation of gametes. Design. Cross‐sectional study. Setting. Seven Swedish university hospital clinics. Sampl...
Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation
Health of 2-year-old children born after vitrified oocyte donation in comparison with peers born after fresh oocyte donation
AbstractSTUDY QUESTIONDoes oocyte vitrification adversely affect the health of 2-year-old children compared with peers born after use of fresh oocytes in a donation programme?SUMMA...
Discovery of putative oocyte quality markers by comparative ExacTag proteomics
Discovery of putative oocyte quality markers by comparative ExacTag proteomics
AbstractPurpose: Identification of the biomarkers of oocyte quality, and developmental and reprogramming potential is of importance to assisted reproductive technology in humans an...

Back to Top