Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Transformative experience and the principle of informed consent in medicine
View through CrossRef
AbstractThis paper explores how transformative experience generates decision-making problems of particular seriousness in medical settings. Potentially transformative experiences are especially likely to be encountered in medicine, and the associated decisions are confronted jointly by patients and clinicians in the context of an imbalance of power and expertise. However in such scenarios the principle of informed consent, which plays a central role in guiding clinicians, is unequal to the task. We detail how the principle’s assumptions about autonomy, rationality and information handle transformative experiences poorly, appealing to several difficult cases for medical decision-making to illustrate the resulting problem, and we consider how the existing literature on complications with consent fails to offer a resolution. We argue that recognition of the problem has a role to play in achieving a more effective response to transformative decisions. In Sect. 1 we introduce several representative cases of challenging patient decision-making that clinicians might face. In Sect. 2 we detail how transformative experience has been analysed in the recent literature, before outlining in Sect. 3 the theoretical basis of the principle of informed consent, which plays a central role in how clinicians are expected to support decision-making. In Sect. 4, having laid the groundwork for a clear description, we return to the cases given in Sect. 1 to confirm how their transformative nature presents a problem: either clinicians treat the decisions faced by these patients as ‘normal’, encouraging them to focus on information provision that patients may be unable to act on, or they treat them as transformative, in which case they lack the resources to recognise whether they are helping patients make (subjectively) good decisions. In Sect. 5 we argue that the existing literature does not offer any escape from this problem. We close in Sect. 6 by noting the significant impact that appreciating the problem of transformative experience could have on supporting transformative decisions in medicine and briefly suggesting how we might aim to develop new approaches to dealing with these.
Title: Transformative experience and the principle of informed consent in medicine
Description:
AbstractThis paper explores how transformative experience generates decision-making problems of particular seriousness in medical settings.
Potentially transformative experiences are especially likely to be encountered in medicine, and the associated decisions are confronted jointly by patients and clinicians in the context of an imbalance of power and expertise.
However in such scenarios the principle of informed consent, which plays a central role in guiding clinicians, is unequal to the task.
We detail how the principle’s assumptions about autonomy, rationality and information handle transformative experiences poorly, appealing to several difficult cases for medical decision-making to illustrate the resulting problem, and we consider how the existing literature on complications with consent fails to offer a resolution.
We argue that recognition of the problem has a role to play in achieving a more effective response to transformative decisions.
In Sect.
1 we introduce several representative cases of challenging patient decision-making that clinicians might face.
In Sect.
2 we detail how transformative experience has been analysed in the recent literature, before outlining in Sect.
3 the theoretical basis of the principle of informed consent, which plays a central role in how clinicians are expected to support decision-making.
In Sect.
4, having laid the groundwork for a clear description, we return to the cases given in Sect.
1 to confirm how their transformative nature presents a problem: either clinicians treat the decisions faced by these patients as ‘normal’, encouraging them to focus on information provision that patients may be unable to act on, or they treat them as transformative, in which case they lack the resources to recognise whether they are helping patients make (subjectively) good decisions.
In Sect.
5 we argue that the existing literature does not offer any escape from this problem.
We close in Sect.
6 by noting the significant impact that appreciating the problem of transformative experience could have on supporting transformative decisions in medicine and briefly suggesting how we might aim to develop new approaches to dealing with these.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Forced Sterilization
Forced Sterilization
Photo by Renè Müller on Unsplash
INTRODUCTION
Forced sterilization of women around the globe is a human rights violation and bioethical concern. In the past, countries enacted laws...
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
Requirements of informed‐consent to xenotransplantation: a qualitative interview study
BackgroundThe aim is to establish xenotransplantation as a possible alternative to allotransplantation. The clinical application requires that patients give their informed consent ...
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
Informed consent in pediatric anesthesiology
SummaryBackgroundInformed consent for pediatric anesthesia is unique because it is (1) obtained from surrogates (ie, parents) rather than from the patient and (2) sought after pare...
Informed consent: perceptions and practice of orthopaedic trainees
Informed consent: perceptions and practice of orthopaedic trainees
AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of informed consent is to provide patients with adequate information about a proposed plan or intervention, including the benefits and risks, so that ...
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, Piloting and Evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): A protocol for a mixed methods study
Abstract
Background: Practitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent f...
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
Development, piloting, and evaluation of an evidence-based informed consent form for total knee arthroplasty (EvAb-Pilot): a protocol for a mixed methods study
AbstractBackgroundPractitioners frequently use informed consent forms to support the physician-patient communication and the informed consent process. Informed consent for surgery ...
Informed Consent in Mental Health Research at Workplace
Informed Consent in Mental Health Research at Workplace
Background: Ethical considerations and informed consent are crucial in mental health research within workplace settings. The disclosure of mental health issues, the impact of workp...

