Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Deification and Ecclesiology
View through CrossRef
Abstract
The chapter explores connections between two phenomena: theosis and the church. Initially, such connections were not obvious, as the notion of the church was rudimentary and expressed mainly through metaphors. One may discern early metaphors referring to the church and theosis, such as the images of the second Adam and recapitulation. Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite introduced a new way of thinking about the church and theosis. This way was restrictive and hierarchical. The adoption of dialectical categories by the Christian theology advanced the understanding of theosis and its connectedness with the church. Theologians, especially in the East, came to distinguish between the common potentiality and particular actuality of deification. The former, which they called isotheon, transformed to the latter, theosis in the church. The Russian religious philosophy provided a framework for a modern synthesis between the ideas of the Incarnation, the church, and deification.
Title: Deification and Ecclesiology
Description:
Abstract
The chapter explores connections between two phenomena: theosis and the church.
Initially, such connections were not obvious, as the notion of the church was rudimentary and expressed mainly through metaphors.
One may discern early metaphors referring to the church and theosis, such as the images of the second Adam and recapitulation.
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite introduced a new way of thinking about the church and theosis.
This way was restrictive and hierarchical.
The adoption of dialectical categories by the Christian theology advanced the understanding of theosis and its connectedness with the church.
Theologians, especially in the East, came to distinguish between the common potentiality and particular actuality of deification.
The former, which they called isotheon, transformed to the latter, theosis in the church.
The Russian religious philosophy provided a framework for a modern synthesis between the ideas of the Incarnation, the church, and deification.
Related Results
Z metaeklezjologii
Z metaeklezjologii
Meta-Theology denotes a meta-theoretical description of Theology. Similarly, meta-Ecclesiology means a meta-theoretical description of Ecclesiology, and it encompasses all problems...
Deification and Theological Anthropology
Deification and Theological Anthropology
Abstract
Accounts of deification presuppose an anthropology, an account of what humans are such that they can be deified. This chapter surveys such anthropologies. I...
Deification and Ecumenical Dialogues
Deification and Ecumenical Dialogues
Abstract
The idea of deification has been discussed in various ecumenical dialogues since the 1970s. Initially this common point between the traditions was found in ...
Deification in Macarius, Evagrius, and Dionysius
Deification in Macarius, Evagrius, and Dionysius
Abstract
This chapter discusses the teaching on deification of (pseudo-) Macarius, Evagrius of Pontus, and (pseudo-) Dionysius the Areopagite. These three writers of...
Deification and Ecology
Deification and Ecology
Abstract
The chapter considers how the perspective of deification colors people’s relationship with the material world: the Orthodox monastic tradition, intensely fo...
Reading the Church: William Durandus and a New Approach to the History of Ecclesiology
Reading the Church: William Durandus and a New Approach to the History of Ecclesiology
AbstractIn the study of ecclesiology it is often said that the first treatises on the Church were written during the controversies around the bull Unam sanctam (1302) of Pope Bonif...
Beyond the Realistic‐Ethical Distinction in Deification: Reconsidering Norman Russell’s Assessment of Gregory of Nyssa
Beyond the Realistic‐Ethical Distinction in Deification: Reconsidering Norman Russell’s Assessment of Gregory of Nyssa
AbstractThe notion of deification (θεοποίησις) or divinization (θέωσις), a fundamental theme in Eastern Orthodox theology, has long fascinated theologians from different traditions...
Karl Barth’s Critique of Deification
Karl Barth’s Critique of Deification
Abstract
Barth’s criticism of deification is no stand-alone critique but the outcome of structural decisions integral to his mature theology. As such, his criticism ...

