Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Olfactory morphology and physiology of elasmobranchs

View through CrossRef
SUMMARYElasmobranch fishes are thought to possess greater olfactory sensitivities than teleost fishes due in part to the large amount of epithelial surface area that comprises their olfactory organs; however, direct evidence correlating the size of the olfactory organ to olfactory sensitivity is lacking. This study examined the olfactory morphology and physiology of five distantly related elasmobranch species. Specifically, we quantified the number of lamellae and lamellar surface area (as if it were a flat sheet, not considering secondary lamellae) that comprise their olfactory organs. We also calculated the olfactory thresholds and relative effectiveness of amino acid odorants for each species. The olfactory organs varied in both the number of lamellae and lamellar surface area, which may be related to their general habitat, but neither correlated with olfactory threshold. Thresholds to amino acid odorants, major olfactory stimuli of all fishes, ranged from 10–9.0 to 10–6.9 mol l–1, which indicates that these elasmobranch species demonstrate comparable thresholds with teleosts. In addition, the relative effectiveness of amino acid stimuli to the olfactory organ of elasmobranchs is similar to that previously described in teleosts with neutral amino acids eliciting significantly greater responses than others. Collectively, these results indicate parallels in olfactory physiology between these two groups of fishes.
Title: Olfactory morphology and physiology of elasmobranchs
Description:
SUMMARYElasmobranch fishes are thought to possess greater olfactory sensitivities than teleost fishes due in part to the large amount of epithelial surface area that comprises their olfactory organs; however, direct evidence correlating the size of the olfactory organ to olfactory sensitivity is lacking.
This study examined the olfactory morphology and physiology of five distantly related elasmobranch species.
Specifically, we quantified the number of lamellae and lamellar surface area (as if it were a flat sheet, not considering secondary lamellae) that comprise their olfactory organs.
We also calculated the olfactory thresholds and relative effectiveness of amino acid odorants for each species.
The olfactory organs varied in both the number of lamellae and lamellar surface area, which may be related to their general habitat, but neither correlated with olfactory threshold.
Thresholds to amino acid odorants, major olfactory stimuli of all fishes, ranged from 10–9.
0 to 10–6.
9 mol l–1, which indicates that these elasmobranch species demonstrate comparable thresholds with teleosts.
In addition, the relative effectiveness of amino acid stimuli to the olfactory organ of elasmobranchs is similar to that previously described in teleosts with neutral amino acids eliciting significantly greater responses than others.
Collectively, these results indicate parallels in olfactory physiology between these two groups of fishes.

Related Results

Olfactory Bulb Volume for Prognosis in Olfactory Loss
Olfactory Bulb Volume for Prognosis in Olfactory Loss
ObjectiveThe olfactory bulb (OB) is essential for olfactory perception, and its volume is correlated to the olfactory function in normal and pathologic cases. We hypothesized that ...
Retronasal and Orthonasal Olfactory Function in Relation to Olfactory Bulb Volume in Patients With Posttraumatic Loss of Smell
Retronasal and Orthonasal Olfactory Function in Relation to Olfactory Bulb Volume in Patients With Posttraumatic Loss of Smell
AbstractObjective: The aims of this study were to evaluate olfactory function with orthonasal and retronasal testing in patients with posttraumatic olfactory loss and to investigat...
Quantifying peripheral modulation of olfaction by trigeminal agonists
Quantifying peripheral modulation of olfaction by trigeminal agonists
Abstract In the mammalian nose, two chemosensory systems, the trigeminal and the olfactory mediate the detection of volatile chemicals. Most odor...
Getting Nosy: Olfactory Rosette Morphology and Lamellar Microstructure of Two Chondrichthyan Species
Getting Nosy: Olfactory Rosette Morphology and Lamellar Microstructure of Two Chondrichthyan Species
Synopsis To smell, fish rely on passive water flow into their olfactory chambers and through their olfactory rosettes to detect chemical signals in their aquatic env...
Comparison of Olfactory Cleft Width and Volumes in Patients with COVID-19 Anosmia and COVID-19 Cases Without Anosmia
Comparison of Olfactory Cleft Width and Volumes in Patients with COVID-19 Anosmia and COVID-19 Cases Without Anosmia
<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between olfactory cleft width/volume and COVID-19-related anosmia. <b>...
Arxhomeobox gene is essential for development of mouse olfactory system
Arxhomeobox gene is essential for development of mouse olfactory system
The olfactory system provides an excellent model in which to study cell proliferation, migration, differentiation, axon guidance, dendritic morphogenesis, and synapse formation. We...
Olfactory Function and Olfactory Bulb Volume in Patients with Postinfectious Olfactory Loss
Olfactory Function and Olfactory Bulb Volume in Patients with Postinfectious Olfactory Loss
AbstractObjective: The study aimed to investigate whether the degree of postinfectious olfactory loss is reflected in volume of the olfactory bulb (OB).Study Design: Retrospective ...
Olfactory receptors in neural regeneration in the central nervous system
Olfactory receptors in neural regeneration in the central nervous system
Olfactory receptors are crucial for detecting odors and play a vital role in our sense of smell, influencing behaviors from food choices to emotional memories. These receptors also...

Back to Top