Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

“Mental” Illness: Subjectivity in Shahd Alshammari’s Notes on the Flesh and Lauren Slater’s Lying

View through CrossRef
This presentation is a comparative study between two works of autobiographic fiction: Lauren Slater’s Lying (2000), which is about the author's epilepsy diagnosis, and Kuwaiti author Dr. Shahd Alshammari’s Notes on the Flesh (2017), about her diagnosis of, and how she lives with, multiple sclerosis. The two memoirs are studies of identity formation through disability and through the language surrounding disability: the languages both encompass disease as too medicalized and removed from personal experience to be able to describe disease. Both female authors choose to metaphorize their diagnoses in order to best understand (and explain) the pain they live in, the shock of receiving their diagnosis, and the confusion of living in a not-obviously disabled body. Their use of metaphor refers to hidden diseases: the title of Slater’s memoir is a reference to how her disease is hidden, unclear, and has made her feel like her diagnosis is false. Alshammari’s text is a reference to how the disease is written into the body, but not always outwardly shown on it. The authors use postmodern writing, weaving between ‘truth’ and, as Slater’s title blatantly puts it, ‘lying’, and what it means to vacillate between the two when talking about something as abstract as pain. Slater’s epilepsy makes her think that she is lying and that affects how she thinks of her disease. Slater invents a fictional medical procedure, relaying it in her memoir, which for a very long time, she believes happened. Alshammari writes about how her disease is etched onto, or right under, her flesh, and describes her medical procedures using similes and otherworldly language. Both authors show that even the language we use to describe medical procedures affect how we think of the medical practice. Using theorists who study memoir like Thomas Couser, I show that critics who place too much stock and importance in absolute truth in a disability memoir are limiting the disabled community’s chosen method of self-representation.
Hamad bin Khalifa University Press (HBKU Press)
Title: “Mental” Illness: Subjectivity in Shahd Alshammari’s Notes on the Flesh and Lauren Slater’s Lying
Description:
This presentation is a comparative study between two works of autobiographic fiction: Lauren Slater’s Lying (2000), which is about the author's epilepsy diagnosis, and Kuwaiti author Dr.
Shahd Alshammari’s Notes on the Flesh (2017), about her diagnosis of, and how she lives with, multiple sclerosis.
The two memoirs are studies of identity formation through disability and through the language surrounding disability: the languages both encompass disease as too medicalized and removed from personal experience to be able to describe disease.
Both female authors choose to metaphorize their diagnoses in order to best understand (and explain) the pain they live in, the shock of receiving their diagnosis, and the confusion of living in a not-obviously disabled body.
Their use of metaphor refers to hidden diseases: the title of Slater’s memoir is a reference to how her disease is hidden, unclear, and has made her feel like her diagnosis is false.
Alshammari’s text is a reference to how the disease is written into the body, but not always outwardly shown on it.
The authors use postmodern writing, weaving between ‘truth’ and, as Slater’s title blatantly puts it, ‘lying’, and what it means to vacillate between the two when talking about something as abstract as pain.
Slater’s epilepsy makes her think that she is lying and that affects how she thinks of her disease.
Slater invents a fictional medical procedure, relaying it in her memoir, which for a very long time, she believes happened.
Alshammari writes about how her disease is etched onto, or right under, her flesh, and describes her medical procedures using similes and otherworldly language.
Both authors show that even the language we use to describe medical procedures affect how we think of the medical practice.
Using theorists who study memoir like Thomas Couser, I show that critics who place too much stock and importance in absolute truth in a disability memoir are limiting the disabled community’s chosen method of self-representation.

Related Results

Alteration
Alteration
\r Mental illness is surprisingly far more common than people care to believe. This is in part due to the stigma which follows close behind it. Stigma, a mark of disgrace, began be...
A Comparative Study on the Sexual Functioning among Men with and without Severe Mental Illness
A Comparative Study on the Sexual Functioning among Men with and without Severe Mental Illness
Objective: The aim of the study is to compare the sexual functioning among men with and without severe mental illness. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in Psych...
Critical Analysis of Nursing Roles in An Evolving Healthcare Landscape
Critical Analysis of Nursing Roles in An Evolving Healthcare Landscape
The status of nurses working in healthcare facilities has transformed in terms of the relevance of their work to emerging healthcare systems. Taken within the context of a transfor...
PSYCHIATRY POSTING AMONG NURSING STUDENTS: ATTITUDE TO MENTAL ILLNESS
PSYCHIATRY POSTING AMONG NURSING STUDENTS: ATTITUDE TO MENTAL ILLNESS
Background: Attitude towards mental illness influence the nursing students’ choice to take up training and placement in psychiatry as a specialty. The aim of the study was to exami...
Prevalence of Reported Mental Illness in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Community-Based Study
Prevalence of Reported Mental Illness in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A Community-Based Study
BACKGROUND: Mental illness is the second leading cause of disease burden globally, following cardiovascular diseases. Over 25% of people worldwide will experience mental illness at...
Exploring the problem gambling health-harm paradox
Exploring the problem gambling health-harm paradox
Purpose: Previous research by NatCen identified a potential health-harm paradox for mental wellbeing and gambling, finding that those with poor mental wellbeing or a diagnosed ment...

Back to Top