Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Evaluating the Alarm Fatigue and its Associated Factors among Clinicians in Critical Care Units

View through CrossRef
The Alarm Fatigue (AF) occurs when clinicians are exposed to a large number of false alarms which can cause alarm desensitization. AF is a well-recognized patient safety concern in intensive care settings. This study aims to evaluate the alarm fatigue in clinicians along with its associated factors in critical care settings using a valid and reliable instrument. During 2020, a cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians working in Critical care units in Lebanon and enrolled 337 participants via self-administered electronic questionnaire. The survey included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, health status, staff recognition of alarms and alarm management, and Alarm Fatigue questionnaire. The translation and cultural adaptation of the Alarm Fatigue questionnaire in Arabic followed a standardized protocol.  The mean age of participants was 30.79 (SD=7.26; median=29) years, 61.4% were women. 77.2% were nursing staff and 22.8% were physicians. 78.8% worked in private hospitals.  41.3% of staff were from neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. 58.8% of clinicians find that more than 50% of alarms were irrelevant, and 69.4% deactivate and silence the alarm when annoyed. The Alarm Fatigue questionnaire has good reliability and validity. The Cronbach alpha was 0.69 which establishes good reliability for group comparison. AF in physicians (OR=2.25; 95%CI=-0.01-4.50, p=0.05) and Registered Nurses (OR=2.64; 95%CI=-0.52-4.75, p=0.02) was higher than in nurses and head nurses; AF was more frequent in ICUs units (OR=2.1; 95%CI=0.05-4.18, p=0.04) compared to other critical care units.  The AF was higher for the clinicians that deactivate and silence the alarm when annoyed compared to other subgroup (OR=4.14, 95%CI=2.75–5.53, p<0.001).  The AF was 3.14 times frequent for the staff who reported stress (p<0.001). Non-actionable alarms occurred frequently and associated to alarm fatigue.  Physicians score slightly higher alarm fatigue than nurses. The Arabic Alarm Fatigue questionnaire has a good psychometric properties and suitable to evaluate the AF in Lebanon.  Multidisciplinary approaches can be established to minimize the incidence of AF using a valid and reliable instrument.
Title: Evaluating the Alarm Fatigue and its Associated Factors among Clinicians in Critical Care Units
Description:
The Alarm Fatigue (AF) occurs when clinicians are exposed to a large number of false alarms which can cause alarm desensitization.
AF is a well-recognized patient safety concern in intensive care settings.
This study aims to evaluate the alarm fatigue in clinicians along with its associated factors in critical care settings using a valid and reliable instrument.
During 2020, a cross-sectional study was conducted among clinicians working in Critical care units in Lebanon and enrolled 337 participants via self-administered electronic questionnaire.
The survey included questions on socio-demographic characteristics, health status, staff recognition of alarms and alarm management, and Alarm Fatigue questionnaire.
The translation and cultural adaptation of the Alarm Fatigue questionnaire in Arabic followed a standardized protocol.
  The mean age of participants was 30.
79 (SD=7.
26; median=29) years, 61.
4% were women.
77.
2% were nursing staff and 22.
8% were physicians.
78.
8% worked in private hospitals.
  41.
3% of staff were from neonatal and pediatric intensive care units.
58.
8% of clinicians find that more than 50% of alarms were irrelevant, and 69.
4% deactivate and silence the alarm when annoyed.
The Alarm Fatigue questionnaire has good reliability and validity.
The Cronbach alpha was 0.
69 which establishes good reliability for group comparison.
AF in physicians (OR=2.
25; 95%CI=-0.
01-4.
50, p=0.
05) and Registered Nurses (OR=2.
64; 95%CI=-0.
52-4.
75, p=0.
02) was higher than in nurses and head nurses; AF was more frequent in ICUs units (OR=2.
1; 95%CI=0.
05-4.
18, p=0.
04) compared to other critical care units.
  The AF was higher for the clinicians that deactivate and silence the alarm when annoyed compared to other subgroup (OR=4.
14, 95%CI=2.
75–5.
53, p<0.
001).
  The AF was 3.
14 times frequent for the staff who reported stress (p<0.
001).
Non-actionable alarms occurred frequently and associated to alarm fatigue.
 Physicians score slightly higher alarm fatigue than nurses.
The Arabic Alarm Fatigue questionnaire has a good psychometric properties and suitable to evaluate the AF in Lebanon.
 Multidisciplinary approaches can be established to minimize the incidence of AF using a valid and reliable instrument.

Related Results

Alarm fatigue and perceived stress among critical care nurses in the intensive care units: Palestinian perspectives
Alarm fatigue and perceived stress among critical care nurses in the intensive care units: Palestinian perspectives
AbstractObjectiveThe frequency of alarms generated by monitors and other electro-medical devices is undeniably valuable but can simultaneously escalate the workload for healthcare ...
Animal Alarm Calls
Animal Alarm Calls
Alarm calls are broadly defined as calls occurring in a predator context. Alarm calls have been the subject of intense scrutiny in animal communication research, as they are releva...
Detecting False Alarms by Analyzing Alarm-Context Information: Algorithm Development and Validation (Preprint)
Detecting False Alarms by Analyzing Alarm-Context Information: Algorithm Development and Validation (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Although alarm safety is a critical issue that needs to be addressed to improve patient care, hospitals have not given serious consideration abou...
A Framework to Assess Alarm Fatigue Indicators in Critical Care Staff
A Framework to Assess Alarm Fatigue Indicators in Critical Care Staff
OBJECTIVES: This article examines work-related and Personality personality factors that could influence health providers in experiencing alarm fatigue. The purpose of t...
Assessment of Objective and Subjective Fatigubility in Obese
Assessment of Objective and Subjective Fatigubility in Obese
Aim: This study aimed to quantify objective fatigue using the Long Distance Corridor Walk (2-Minute Walk Test and 400-Meter Walk Test) and evaluate subjective fatigue using the Fat...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Determinants of Medical Equipment Alarm Fatigue in Practicing Nurses: A Systematic Review
Determinants of Medical Equipment Alarm Fatigue in Practicing Nurses: A Systematic Review
Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate the level of medical equipment alarm fatigue and its influencing factors among clinical nurses. Methods PubMed, Embase, CNKI, ...
Optimizing Multimodal Alarm Design for Attention Allocation in Discrete Monitoring Tasks
Optimizing Multimodal Alarm Design for Attention Allocation in Discrete Monitoring Tasks
Discrete monitoring tasks are common in scenarios such as flight missions, air traffic control, nuclear power plant monitoring, and clinical healthcare. In these tasks, operators p...

Back to Top