Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approaches in TKA: Comparison of Functional Results

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the early and late postoperative period using subvastus and medial parapatellar approach. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a group of 169 patients (180 TKAs) with 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into a study group (97 TKAs) with a subvastus approach and a control group (83 TKAs) with a parapatellar approach. Assessment of the results of both operating approaches was based on functional, clinical Knee Society Score, and pain (visual analog scale). Patients in the subvastus group achieved full active extension, better range of motion, and better Knee Society Score results at 12 days, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks earlier than patients in the medial parapatellar group. They also had less pain at 12 days. No statistically significant differences existed between assessed end points in both groups at 24- and 52-weeks, and 24-months postoperatively. The subvastus approach has given patients better early clinical results; however, at longer follow-up, both groups had similar outcomes. The potential benefits of the subvastus approach are: protection of the extensor mechanism from damage, less risk of damaging the blood supply to the patella, earlier clinical recovery, and less pain in the early postoperative period. The subvastus approach is an alternative to the standard medial parapatellar approach in TKA. It can be used with equally good results, especially taking into consideration positive clinical aspects in the early postoperative period.