Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Peace and Conflict Resolution
View through CrossRef
This chapter takes a closer look at the resolution of conflicts during the Viking Age. Even though Scandinavia was a peaceful region during the Viking Age, conflicts did happen between kings, between pretenders to the throne, between kings and chieftains, and between chieftains. Resolving conflicts during that time mostly revolved around creating new social networks. The chapter revisits the 1036 peace agreement between Norwegian king Magnus Olafsson and the Danish king Harthacnut. The said pact showed that strong kinship and friendship ties contributed to reducing societal tensions and internal strife. During and after battles, men could give grið (truce) to their friends and kin, an oath which signified that they guaranteed their personal security. In other words, having a kinsman or friend on the opposite side of an armed conflict was a kind of life insurance. The chapter also explains why the Viking Age battles described as the bloodiest are usually those with the highest percentage of foreigners. The Scandinavian royalty also uses marriage to further its goal of establishing alliances. Another way to establish string ties of loyalty among kings and chieftains was for them to foster one another's sons. This enables them to build a power base at the same time. Hostages, drawn from among those held in the highest regard, were also exchanged to create peace during the Viking Age. They were treated well while in the enemy's care to ensure the good nature of future relationships.
Title: Peace and Conflict Resolution
Description:
This chapter takes a closer look at the resolution of conflicts during the Viking Age.
Even though Scandinavia was a peaceful region during the Viking Age, conflicts did happen between kings, between pretenders to the throne, between kings and chieftains, and between chieftains.
Resolving conflicts during that time mostly revolved around creating new social networks.
The chapter revisits the 1036 peace agreement between Norwegian king Magnus Olafsson and the Danish king Harthacnut.
The said pact showed that strong kinship and friendship ties contributed to reducing societal tensions and internal strife.
During and after battles, men could give grið (truce) to their friends and kin, an oath which signified that they guaranteed their personal security.
In other words, having a kinsman or friend on the opposite side of an armed conflict was a kind of life insurance.
The chapter also explains why the Viking Age battles described as the bloodiest are usually those with the highest percentage of foreigners.
The Scandinavian royalty also uses marriage to further its goal of establishing alliances.
Another way to establish string ties of loyalty among kings and chieftains was for them to foster one another's sons.
This enables them to build a power base at the same time.
Hostages, drawn from among those held in the highest regard, were also exchanged to create peace during the Viking Age.
They were treated well while in the enemy's care to ensure the good nature of future relationships.
Related Results
Nuevas ideas para la paz y el Premio Internacional de la Paz Johan Galtung
Nuevas ideas para la paz y el Premio Internacional de la Paz Johan Galtung
Excepting the Nobel Peace Prize, most of the international peace prizes are little known; some are not even regularly awarded; and a number of these, including the Nobel Peace Priz...
Role Of Teacher For Peace Education
Role Of Teacher For Peace Education
This paper outlines a framework for developing peace education agenda in high schools and college and university level. Historical peace education programs are reviewed and include...
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict Management in the Workplace
Conflict is a component of interpersonal interactions, and therefore natural in the workplace. While neither inevitable nor intrinsically bad, conflict is commonplace. Conflicts ma...
Conflict Management
Conflict Management
Any attempt to define conflict management is not an easy feat. It is a dynamic concept with blurry boundaries. In its most simple form, as Dennis Sandole says, conflict management ...
Promoting Religious Dimension in Conflict Resolution: A Review on Mohammed Abu-Nimer Thoughts
Promoting Religious Dimension in Conflict Resolution: A Review on Mohammed Abu-Nimer Thoughts
The aim of this paper is to review Mohammed Abu Nimer thoughts on the field of conflict resolution, peace-building, and inter-religious dialogues. As a thinker and practitioner of ...
The Blue Beret
The Blue Beret
When we think of United Nations (UN) peacekeepers, the first image that is conjured in our mind is of an individual sporting a blue helmet or a blue beret (fig. 1). While simple an...
Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict
Unbundling task conflict and relationship conflict
PurposeThis study seeks to explore team goal orientation as a team characteristic that affects team members' self‐regulation, and conflict management approach as a self‐regulation ...
UNDERSTANDING PEACE FORMATION: A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
UNDERSTANDING PEACE FORMATION: A SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
Peace study is now one of the most debated discourses. In the discourse of peace study, the modes of peace which was based on the liberal western values have long gained supremacy....

