Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie (1861–1916)

View through CrossRef
Duhem was a French Catholic physicist, historian of science and philosopher of science. Champion of a programme of generalized thermodynamics as a unifying framework for physical science, he was a pioneer in the history of medieval and renaissance science, where he emphasized a continuity between medieval and early modern science. Duhem was also one of the most influential philosophers of science of his day, thanks to his opposition to mechanistic modes of explanation and his development of a holistic conception of scientific theories, according to which individual empirical propositions are not tested in isolation but only in conjunction with other theoretical claims and associated auxiliary hypotheses. Such a view of theory testing entails that there are no ‘crucial experiments’ deciding unambiguously for or against a given theory and that empirical evidence therefore underdetermines theory choice. Theory choice is thus partly a matter of convention. Duhem’s conventionalism is similar in kind to that later advocated by Otto Neurath and by W.V. Quine.
Title: Duhem, Pierre Maurice Marie (1861–1916)
Description:
Duhem was a French Catholic physicist, historian of science and philosopher of science.
Champion of a programme of generalized thermodynamics as a unifying framework for physical science, he was a pioneer in the history of medieval and renaissance science, where he emphasized a continuity between medieval and early modern science.
Duhem was also one of the most influential philosophers of science of his day, thanks to his opposition to mechanistic modes of explanation and his development of a holistic conception of scientific theories, according to which individual empirical propositions are not tested in isolation but only in conjunction with other theoretical claims and associated auxiliary hypotheses.
Such a view of theory testing entails that there are no ‘crucial experiments’ deciding unambiguously for or against a given theory and that empirical evidence therefore underdetermines theory choice.
Theory choice is thus partly a matter of convention.
Duhem’s conventionalism is similar in kind to that later advocated by Otto Neurath and by W.
V.
Quine.

Related Results

Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19
Impact of intensive prone position therapy on outcomes in intubated patients with ARDS related to COVID-19
Abstract Background Previous retrospective research has shown that maintaining prone positioning (PP) for an average of 40 h is associated with an i...
Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores
Predicting 90-day survival of patients with COVID-19: Survival of Severely Ill COVID (SOSIC) scores
Abstract Background Predicting outcomes of critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients with coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) is a major chall...
On the consistency of hysteresis models
On the consistency of hysteresis models
Hysteresis is a nonlinear behavior encountered in a wide variety of processes including biology, optics, electronics, ferroelectricity, magnetism, mechanics, structures, among othe...

Back to Top