Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Brains in bodies in the—social, built, and natural—environment
View through CrossRef
Each brain enlivens a body in interaction with the social and physical environment. Peter Zumthor’s Therme at Vals exemplifies the interplay of interior with surroundings, and ways the actions of users fuse with their multimodal experience. The action–perception cycle includes both practical and contemplative actions. The author analyzes what Louis Sullivan meant by “form ever follows function,” but more often talks of aesthetics and utility. Not only are action, perception, and emotion intertwined, but so are remembering and imagination. Architectural design leads to the physical construction of buildings—but much of what our brains achieve can be seen as a form of mental construction. A first look at neuroscience offers schema theory as a bridge from cognitive processes to neural circuitry. Some architects fear that neuroscience will strip the architect of any creativity. In counterpoint, two-way reduction explores how neuroscience can “dissect” phenomenology by showing how first-person experiences arise from melding diverse subconscious processes. This raises the possibility that neuroscience can extend the effectiveness of architectural design by showing how different aspects of a building may affect human experience in ways that are not apparent to self-reflection.
Title: Brains in bodies in the—social, built, and natural—environment
Description:
Each brain enlivens a body in interaction with the social and physical environment.
Peter Zumthor’s Therme at Vals exemplifies the interplay of interior with surroundings, and ways the actions of users fuse with their multimodal experience.
The action–perception cycle includes both practical and contemplative actions.
The author analyzes what Louis Sullivan meant by “form ever follows function,” but more often talks of aesthetics and utility.
Not only are action, perception, and emotion intertwined, but so are remembering and imagination.
Architectural design leads to the physical construction of buildings—but much of what our brains achieve can be seen as a form of mental construction.
A first look at neuroscience offers schema theory as a bridge from cognitive processes to neural circuitry.
Some architects fear that neuroscience will strip the architect of any creativity.
In counterpoint, two-way reduction explores how neuroscience can “dissect” phenomenology by showing how first-person experiences arise from melding diverse subconscious processes.
This raises the possibility that neuroscience can extend the effectiveness of architectural design by showing how different aspects of a building may affect human experience in ways that are not apparent to self-reflection.
Related Results
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
Tijelo u opusu Janka Polića Kamova
The doctoral disertation is dedicated to the concept of the body in the works of Janko Polić Kamov. The body is approached as a signifier system on the basis of which numerous and ...
Performing Brains on Screen
Performing Brains on Screen
<i>Performing Brains on Screen</i> deals with film enactments and representations of the belief that human beings are essentially their brains, a belief that embodies o...
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Ecosystem Services Analysis for the Design of Regenerative Urban Built Environments
Ecosystem Services Analysis for the Design of Regenerative Urban Built Environments
<p>Humans will need to mitigate the causes of, and adapt to climate change and the loss of biodiversity, as the now inevitable impacts of these changes become more apparent a...
Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods
Ecological not social factors explain brain size in cephalopods
AbstractSocial factors have been argued to be the main selection pressure for the evolution of large brains and complex behavior on the basis of data from mammals and birds. Coleoi...
Natural philosophy, medieval
Natural philosophy, medieval
Medieval Latin natural philosophy falls into two main periods, before the rise of the universities (mainly in the twelfth century, when works were produced in connection with arist...
When Brains Meet Buildings
When Brains Meet Buildings
Understanding our brains can enrich our understanding of the ways we act and interact in a complex world, and how our experience of the built environment helps shape who we are and...

