Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A Journal-Level Analysis of Progress in Transplantation

View through CrossRef
Context: Citations to articles published in academic journals represent a proxy for influence in bibliometrics. Objective: To measure the journal impact factor for Progress in Transplantation over time and to also identify related journals indexed in transplantation and surgery. Design: Data from Journal Citation Reports (ISI web of science) were used to rank Progress in Transplantation compared to peer journals using journal impact and journal relatedness measures. Social network analysis was used to measure relationships between pairs of journals in Progress in Transplantation’s relatedness network. Main Outcome Measures: Journal impact factor and journal relatedness. Results: Data from 2010 through 2015 indicate the average journal article in PIT was cited 0.87 times (standard deviation [SD] = 0.12) and this estimate was stable over time. Progress in Transplantation most often cited American Journal of Transplantation, Transplantation, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, and Liver Transplantation. In terms of cited data, the journal was most often referenced by Clinical Transplantation, Transplant International, and Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. Conclusion: The journal is listed both in surgery and transplantation categories of Journal Citation Reports and its impact factors over time fare better with surgery journals than with transplant journals. Network data using betweenness centrality indicate Progress in Transplantation links transplantation-focused journals and journals indexed in health sciences categories.
Title: A Journal-Level Analysis of Progress in Transplantation
Description:
Context: Citations to articles published in academic journals represent a proxy for influence in bibliometrics.
Objective: To measure the journal impact factor for Progress in Transplantation over time and to also identify related journals indexed in transplantation and surgery.
Design: Data from Journal Citation Reports (ISI web of science) were used to rank Progress in Transplantation compared to peer journals using journal impact and journal relatedness measures.
Social network analysis was used to measure relationships between pairs of journals in Progress in Transplantation’s relatedness network.
Main Outcome Measures: Journal impact factor and journal relatedness.
Results: Data from 2010 through 2015 indicate the average journal article in PIT was cited 0.
87 times (standard deviation [SD] = 0.
12) and this estimate was stable over time.
Progress in Transplantation most often cited American Journal of Transplantation, Transplantation, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, and Liver Transplantation.
In terms of cited data, the journal was most often referenced by Clinical Transplantation, Transplant International, and Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation.
Conclusion: The journal is listed both in surgery and transplantation categories of Journal Citation Reports and its impact factors over time fare better with surgery journals than with transplant journals.
Network data using betweenness centrality indicate Progress in Transplantation links transplantation-focused journals and journals indexed in health sciences categories.

Related Results

Risk factors for early mortality (within 90 days) in pediatric liver transplant recipients
Risk factors for early mortality (within 90 days) in pediatric liver transplant recipients
Liver transplantation (LT) is a potential treatment for acute or chronic conditions of the liver that cause the body to function irreversibly and severely. Studies have been conduc...
Future Prospects of Organ Transplantation
Future Prospects of Organ Transplantation
The gap between organ demand and supply is an universal problem in organ and tissue transplantation therapy. The gap is growing in spite of efforts spent in medical, educational, s...
Risk factors for new‐onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Risk factors for new‐onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
AbstractAims/IntroductionTo systematically review the risk factors for new‐onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation, and to provide a theoretical basis for the preventi...
TRANSPLANTATION PSYCHIATRY: AN OVERVIEW
TRANSPLANTATION PSYCHIATRY: AN OVERVIEW
Psychiatric consultation and evaluation is an important part of candidate selection for organ transplantation. Psychiatricassessment of patients undergoing transplantation procedur...
Transplantation Principles
Transplantation Principles
Transplantation is a truly multidisciplinary specialty where a surgical procedure requires inputs from both, the specialists of the specific organ e.g. nephrologist for kidney tran...
Parents' readiness for pediatric kidney transplantation and treatment lifestyle
Parents' readiness for pediatric kidney transplantation and treatment lifestyle
The purpose of this phenomenological qualitative study was to examine the process by which pediatric kidney transplantation therapy leads to lifestyle changes in medical and health...
Special Considerations for Secondary Surgery After Upper Extremity Transplantation
Special Considerations for Secondary Surgery After Upper Extremity Transplantation
Background Upper extremity (UE) transplantation is a complex undertaking that may require emergent or elective secondary surgery (SS) days to years following transplant. Various pa...
Allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal transplantation: a meta‐analysis
Allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal transplantation: a meta‐analysis
AbstractObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of allograft nephrectomy vs. no‐allograft nephrectomy for renal re‐transplantation.MethodsMedline (PubMed), Embase, Ovid, Cochran...

Back to Top