Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in non-metastatic locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer – A prospective and randomized study

View through CrossRef
Background: Sequential chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are two treatment options for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Still there is limited data regarding which is the better treatment option. Aims and Objectives: This study is to compare the response rate and toxicity pattern between induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced NSCLC patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 Stage III NSCLC patients were selected for the study and were randomized into two arms with a 1:1 ratio. Patients of ARM-1 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone of a total dose of 66Gy/33# over 6 and ⅟2 weeks with paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and carboplatin (Area under curve [AUC] 2) once every week. The study arm (ARM-2) received two cycles of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (same CRT as on ARM-1). Results: In our study, overall response rate (Complete response+Partial response) in Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 62% and 71%, respectively. The treatment was very tolerated in our study. A mean follow-up of 12 months by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a statistically non-significant difference in disease-free survival in both arms. Progression-free survival was numerically superior in the induction chemotherapy arm but the difference was statistically non-significant. Acute hematological toxicity was numerically more in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy arm, but statistically not significant. Acute lung toxicity, acute pharynx, and esophagus toxicity were numerically more in the induction chemotherapy arm but statistically non-significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the present study population.
Title: Outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in non-metastatic locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer – A prospective and randomized study
Description:
Background: Sequential chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are two treatment options for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Still there is limited data regarding which is the better treatment option.
Aims and Objectives: This study is to compare the response rate and toxicity pattern between induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced NSCLC patients.
Materials and Methods: A total of 48 Stage III NSCLC patients were selected for the study and were randomized into two arms with a 1:1 ratio.
Patients of ARM-1 received concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone of a total dose of 66Gy/33# over 6 and ⅟2 weeks with paclitaxel (50 mg/m2) and carboplatin (Area under curve [AUC] 2) once every week.
The study arm (ARM-2) received two cycles of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6) every 3 weeks and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (same CRT as on ARM-1).
Results: In our study, overall response rate (Complete response+Partial response) in Arm 1 and Arm 2 was 62% and 71%, respectively.
The treatment was very tolerated in our study.
A mean follow-up of 12 months by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed a statistically non-significant difference in disease-free survival in both arms.
Progression-free survival was numerically superior in the induction chemotherapy arm but the difference was statistically non-significant.
Acute hematological toxicity was numerically more in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy arm, but statistically not significant.
Acute lung toxicity, acute pharynx, and esophagus toxicity were numerically more in the induction chemotherapy arm but statistically non-significant.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference between induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the present study population.

Related Results

Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction  Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy and Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Objectives: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Renal Ewing Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract Introduction Primary renal Ewing sarcoma is an extremely rare and aggressive tumor, representing less than 1% of all renal tumors. This case report contributes valuable in...
The impact of peri-operative chemotherapy on the outcomes of patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
The impact of peri-operative chemotherapy on the outcomes of patients with non-metastatic cholangiocarcinoma.
563 Background: Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis and outcome despite therapy. It accounts for 2.2% of all new cancer cases and 5% of all cancer deaths. ...
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
Breast cancer biomarkers : dynamics during treatment and metastatic progression
<p dir="ltr">Breast cancer is a major global health challenge as incidence is increasing, and risk of recurrence remains a significant concern for long-term survivors. In an ...

Back to Top