Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Fix the Date
View through CrossRef
This chapter constitutes a case history of how, thanks to scholarship, a cult
can collectively construct a hard fact. Because Victorian historians relied
on strict chronology as an antidote to hagiography, they elected the Old
English Chronicle to replace Asser’s hagiographic Latin Life of Alfred as
the prime reliquary for the cult of the historical Alfred. Plummer found
Alfred’s true birthdate not in the Life but the Chronicle. This dialectic
of hagiography and chronology illuminates how and why the question
of the legendary Alfred’s historical birthdate was first posed in 1876 by
the nouveau riche autodidact Henry Howorth in his intense controversy
with the aristocratic Roman Catholic Bishop William Clifford and then
professionally, but shortsightedly, resolved by Plummer in 1901.
Amsterdam University Press
Title: Fix the Date
Description:
This chapter constitutes a case history of how, thanks to scholarship, a cult
can collectively construct a hard fact.
Because Victorian historians relied
on strict chronology as an antidote to hagiography, they elected the Old
English Chronicle to replace Asser’s hagiographic Latin Life of Alfred as
the prime reliquary for the cult of the historical Alfred.
Plummer found
Alfred’s true birthdate not in the Life but the Chronicle.
This dialectic
of hagiography and chronology illuminates how and why the question
of the legendary Alfred’s historical birthdate was first posed in 1876 by
the nouveau riche autodidact Henry Howorth in his intense controversy
with the aristocratic Roman Catholic Bishop William Clifford and then
professionally, but shortsightedly, resolved by Plummer in 1901.

