Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Ivan the Terrible's Terror Territoriality in Moscow

View through CrossRef
Abstract: This paper discusses the spatiality of the oprichnina, the notoriously repressive and controversially divisive policy (1565–72) of the first Russian tsar, Ivan the Terrible. Although the chronicle provides a very precise description of its territory in Moscow, later reproductions and representations of the oprichnina have most often been incomplete or variously biased, arguably due to its complex spatiality as well as changing ideological contexts in the country, especially in the Stalinist period, when both Ivan the Terrible and Moscow as the capital of the so-called "centralized Russian state" were in demand as justification for Stalin's personality cult. Ivan the Terrible's oprichnina territory in Moscow evades simple binary classification. It could be better understood as "the other," a heterotopic ex-centric space constructed as a preventative infrastructure for real, local environmental challenges or an eccentric reaction to imagined global eschatological threats.
Title: Ivan the Terrible's Terror Territoriality in Moscow
Description:
Abstract: This paper discusses the spatiality of the oprichnina, the notoriously repressive and controversially divisive policy (1565–72) of the first Russian tsar, Ivan the Terrible.
Although the chronicle provides a very precise description of its territory in Moscow, later reproductions and representations of the oprichnina have most often been incomplete or variously biased, arguably due to its complex spatiality as well as changing ideological contexts in the country, especially in the Stalinist period, when both Ivan the Terrible and Moscow as the capital of the so-called "centralized Russian state" were in demand as justification for Stalin's personality cult.
Ivan the Terrible's oprichnina territory in Moscow evades simple binary classification.
It could be better understood as "the other," a heterotopic ex-centric space constructed as a preventative infrastructure for real, local environmental challenges or an eccentric reaction to imagined global eschatological threats.

Related Results

CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
CLIMATE-2019 Program committee
NOTITLE. Chairman Mokhov Igor RAS academecian, Dr. Sci., Professor ...
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
Ivan the Terrible as a problem of Russian Philosophy of History
The purpose of the article is to consider the historiosophical ideas about the personality of Ivan IV the Terrible and his role in the history of the Russian state. To achieve this...
Territoriality
Territoriality
Territoriality is a foundational concept in animal behavior and behavioral ecology. Territoriality is commonly defined as “the defense of an area,” wherein the area being defended ...
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV the Terrible, Tsar of Russia
Ivan IV (Ivan Vasil’evich, Ivan the Terrible, Ivan Groznyi [the Awe-Inspiring]) was born in 1530 and ruled from 1533 to 1547 as Grand Prince of Moscow and All Russia and from 1547 ...
Internasionalisasi dan Internalisasi Wacana War on Terror
Internasionalisasi dan Internalisasi Wacana War on Terror
AbstrakPeristiwa 9/11 menimbulkan reaksi tegas dari Amerika Serikat (AS). AS melalui Presiden Bush dalam pidatonya pada tanggal 20 September 2001 menyatakan perang melawan terorism...
Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography
Ivan the Terrible in Russian Historiography
Russian historians have taken a livelier interest in Ivan the Terrible than in any other Tsar except Peter the Great. But they have always been seriously handicapped in their treat...
Terrorizing Rhetoric: The Advancement of U.S. Hegemony Through the Lack of a Definition of 'Terror'
Terrorizing Rhetoric: The Advancement of U.S. Hegemony Through the Lack of a Definition of 'Terror'
As the usage of the word "terror" and its variants became increasingly universal in, and thus important to, foreign affairs post-September 11, the usage of the word has itself beco...

Back to Top