Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Juozas Keliuotis in the Target of KGB in 1956–1978

View through CrossRef
The life of Juozas Keliuotis, one of the most conspicuous cultural workers of Lithuania, in Soviet times shows the specificity of the psychological pressure on intellectuals. The KGB unit in Lithuania involved many personalities in its manipulatory games. J. Keliuotis was of no exception. Persecuted and morally broken he wrote the memoirs revealing sufferings in the camp and violations of human rights. In 1962–1975, KGB spared no efforts seeking to find and obtain the memoirs of the intellectual in question. Even though the security failed to fetch the manuscripts of the intellectual, it succeeded in hindering for a long time their passing over to the West. Dealing with the independent Lithuanian authoritative persons was planned by experienced and influential KGB operational workers. In 1956–1978, J. Keliuotis was shadowed by quite a number of agents. It was people from the environment of the intellectual that were mostly hired. Most frequently he had to communicate with the agents of influence. For J. Keliuotis’ control not only agents were used, but also different ways for his efficient shadowing. KGB, with interruptions, applied various so-called operational technical measures: listened to his conversations, carried out secret searches in his apartment, made photos, and controlled J. Keliuotis’ correspondence. Due to constant and active spying by KGB, J. Keliuotis lost trust in his close people. KGB aimed at neutralizing the cultural influence of intellectuals. It was useful to discredit the authoritative persons by instigating them to be in conflict with émigré in terms of cultural relations. In 1971, J. Keliuotis spoke forcibly in the press, not only condemning the activity of emigrants, but also demonstrating economic and cultural “achievements” of Soviet Lithuania. The article of the intellectual was re-edited by operational employees in the direction useful for the Soviet system. The forced trampling on his world outlook meant the fictitious demonstration of loyalty to the Soviet regime. Moreover, such repentance in the press showed that a certain person was gripped by KGB. Public statements of intellectuals were used for Soviet propaganda, and the persons themselves who lost their authority were pushed aside. The individuality of J. Keliuotis in fighting with émigré was necessary for KGB as the tool of manipulation aimed at denying the historic truth. Nevertheless, in the eyes of the public of Soviet Lithuania J. Keliuotis remained as the enlightened person from the times of independence and the advocate of Western modern art. Keliuotis was persecuted until his death 1983 The LSSR Supreme Court rehabilitated the intellectual on December 16, 1998. Only with the change in the political situation, persecution of persons of anti-Soviet disposition and not loyal to the Soviet system was stopped.
Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania
Title: Juozas Keliuotis in the Target of KGB in 1956–1978
Description:
The life of Juozas Keliuotis, one of the most conspicuous cultural workers of Lithuania, in Soviet times shows the specificity of the psychological pressure on intellectuals.
The KGB unit in Lithuania involved many personalities in its manipulatory games.
J.
Keliuotis was of no exception.
Persecuted and morally broken he wrote the memoirs revealing sufferings in the camp and violations of human rights.
In 1962–1975, KGB spared no efforts seeking to find and obtain the memoirs of the intellectual in question.
Even though the security failed to fetch the manuscripts of the intellectual, it succeeded in hindering for a long time their passing over to the West.
Dealing with the independent Lithuanian authoritative persons was planned by experienced and influential KGB operational workers.
In 1956–1978, J.
Keliuotis was shadowed by quite a number of agents.
It was people from the environment of the intellectual that were mostly hired.
Most frequently he had to communicate with the agents of influence.
For J.
Keliuotis’ control not only agents were used, but also different ways for his efficient shadowing.
KGB, with interruptions, applied various so-called operational technical measures: listened to his conversations, carried out secret searches in his apartment, made photos, and controlled J.
Keliuotis’ correspondence.
Due to constant and active spying by KGB, J.
Keliuotis lost trust in his close people.
KGB aimed at neutralizing the cultural influence of intellectuals.
It was useful to discredit the authoritative persons by instigating them to be in conflict with émigré in terms of cultural relations.
In 1971, J.
Keliuotis spoke forcibly in the press, not only condemning the activity of emigrants, but also demonstrating economic and cultural “achievements” of Soviet Lithuania.
The article of the intellectual was re-edited by operational employees in the direction useful for the Soviet system.
The forced trampling on his world outlook meant the fictitious demonstration of loyalty to the Soviet regime.
Moreover, such repentance in the press showed that a certain person was gripped by KGB.
Public statements of intellectuals were used for Soviet propaganda, and the persons themselves who lost their authority were pushed aside.
The individuality of J.
Keliuotis in fighting with émigré was necessary for KGB as the tool of manipulation aimed at denying the historic truth.
Nevertheless, in the eyes of the public of Soviet Lithuania J.
Keliuotis remained as the enlightened person from the times of independence and the advocate of Western modern art.
Keliuotis was persecuted until his death 1983 The LSSR Supreme Court rehabilitated the intellectual on December 16, 1998.
Only with the change in the political situation, persecution of persons of anti-Soviet disposition and not loyal to the Soviet system was stopped.

Related Results

Juozas Urbsys in the KGB spotlight. Source Outcrops
Juozas Urbsys in the KGB spotlight. Source Outcrops
After occupying Lithuania, the Soviet Union first arrested and imprisoned members of the Lithuanian government and later other government operatives. Lithuanian Foreign Minister Ju...
Juozas Šibaila-Merainis
Juozas Šibaila-Merainis
During the investigation it was established that the case of Juozas Šibaila, one of the freedom fighters, can be regarded as an individual’s voluntary act of joining the guerrilla ...
Lifting the Cover
Lifting the Cover
This chapter explores how Father Gleb Yakunin, Father Viacheslav Polosin, and journalist Aleksandr Iosifovich Nezhnyi were selected to investigate a special section of the KGB arch...
Biography pages of Juozas Albinas Lukša-Daumantas 1940–1941
Biography pages of Juozas Albinas Lukša-Daumantas 1940–1941
The article examines some pages of the life history of the famous post-war partisan Juozas Albinas Lukša Daumantas (10 August 1921 – 4 September 1951) from 1940 through 1941 that h...
Covering Russia’s KGB Tsar
Covering Russia’s KGB Tsar
This chapter discusses the author's experience covering Russia's new tsar after the first handover of power in the Soviet Union since 1964. As the sole correspondent for the Washin...
A Three-Dimensional Target Depth-Resolution Method with a Single-Vector Sensor
A Three-Dimensional Target Depth-Resolution Method with a Single-Vector Sensor
This paper mainly studies and verifies the target number category-resolution method in multi-target cases and the target depth-resolution method of aerial targets. Firstly, target ...
CRISPR/Cas “non-target” sites inhibit on-target cutting rates
CRISPR/Cas “non-target” sites inhibit on-target cutting rates
AbstractCRISPR/Cas systems have become ubiquitous for genome editing in eukaryotic as well as bacterial systems. Cas9 associated with a guide RNA (gRNA) searches DNA for a matching...
What is Analytic Philosophy
What is Analytic Philosophy
Special Issue: What is Analytic PhilosophyReferencesHaaparantaG. P. Baker and P. M. S. Hacker. Frege: Logical Excavations. Oxford, Blackwell, 1984.M. Dummett. The Interpretation of...

Back to Top