Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Behavioral Economics and Tort Law
View through CrossRef
The chapter discusses the contributions of cognitive psychology and behavioral studies to the research of tort law. These contributions, we show, relate to a wide range of issues in torts: from the basic decision to impose tort liability, through the choice between liability rules, to specific rules and remedies. Accordingly, behavioral studies are of particular significance for the analysis of the tort system. The literature review focuses on contributions made to three key elements of tort law: the choice between liability regimes; the choice between tort liability and regulation (including the choice between harm-based and risk-based liability); and damages (in particular, punitive damages and damages for pain and suffering). The chapter also offers two new avenues for future research: vicarious liability and people’s perceptions of the variability among large groups of tort victims.
Oxford University Press
Title: Behavioral Economics and Tort Law
Description:
The chapter discusses the contributions of cognitive psychology and behavioral studies to the research of tort law.
These contributions, we show, relate to a wide range of issues in torts: from the basic decision to impose tort liability, through the choice between liability rules, to specific rules and remedies.
Accordingly, behavioral studies are of particular significance for the analysis of the tort system.
The literature review focuses on contributions made to three key elements of tort law: the choice between liability regimes; the choice between tort liability and regulation (including the choice between harm-based and risk-based liability); and damages (in particular, punitive damages and damages for pain and suffering).
The chapter also offers two new avenues for future research: vicarious liability and people’s perceptions of the variability among large groups of tort victims.
Related Results
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
Genesis of the development of administrative-tort relations
The article examines the history of administrative tort law and administrative tort process as subsectors of administrative law and administrative process, their controversial and ...
How is Tort Law Political?
How is Tort Law Political?
Abstract
Chapter 16 addresses Gardner’s take on the particular relationship between tort and the political. Flagging of a link between tort and the political is most...
European Tort Law
European Tort Law
Abstract
This is the first introductory text book to European tort law. It brings together national tort law, comparative law, European Union (EU) law, and human rig...
Unifying Principles within Pluralist Tort Adjudication
Unifying Principles within Pluralist Tort Adjudication
Abstract
A healthy political society values diverse viewpoints and their associated moral theories. Recognizing as much, Jane Stapleton and numerous other tort schol...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash
ABSTRACT
In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...

