Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Deep learning based phase picking on seismological IMS stations
View through CrossRef
We present our work on training and the application of deep learning algorithms for the automated phase picking of body waves on the the IMS network. We train new IMS data based seismic phase pickers from both EQT and PhaseNet architectures. Phase picking is a necessary step before event localization and characterization and deep learning based models have been proven to perform well at this task. PhaseNet and EQTransformer are two prominent state-of-the-art phase picking algorithms that have been retrained on several different datasets.Waveform data from primary and auxiliary stations is used in the training and evaluation. For training we use good quality picks from REB events between 2013 until 2023. We evaluate the performance in comparison with unseen evaluation REB phase picks and manual phase picks. We compare the performance with applying other pre-trained phase pickers to the IMS data to determine if already pre-trained models can be used satisfactory out of the box for seismological IMS data. We also evaluate the generalization ability of the two IMS data trained models by applying them to other non IMS seismological stations of the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN). We  further train new phase pickers based on the PhaseNet architecture and a database of 20 years listed in the earthquake catalog of BGR. The models are trained and evaluated with manual phase picks of BGR analysts. We compare the performance of the newly trained models by also applying other pre-trained PhaseNet and EQTransformer based phase pickers on unseen data.  We determine if existing pre-trained models can satisfactorily be used out of the box for phase picking on waveforms of the GRSN.
Title: Deep learning based phase picking on seismological IMS stations
Description:
We present our work on training and the application of deep learning algorithms for the automated phase picking of body waves on the the IMS network.
We train new IMS data based seismic phase pickers from both EQT and PhaseNet architectures.
Phase picking is a necessary step before event localization and characterization and deep learning based models have been proven to perform well at this task.
PhaseNet and EQTransformer are two prominent state-of-the-art phase picking algorithms that have been retrained on several different datasets.
Waveform data from primary and auxiliary stations is used in the training and evaluation.
For training we use good quality picks from REB events between 2013 until 2023.
We evaluate the performance in comparison with unseen evaluation REB phase picks and manual phase picks.
We compare the performance with applying other pre-trained phase pickers to the IMS data to determine if already pre-trained models can be used satisfactory out of the box for seismological IMS data.
We also evaluate the generalization ability of the two IMS data trained models by applying them to other non IMS seismological stations of the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN).
We  further train new phase pickers based on the PhaseNet architecture and a database of 20 years listed in the earthquake catalog of BGR.
The models are trained and evaluated with manual phase picks of BGR analysts.
We compare the performance of the newly trained models by also applying other pre-trained PhaseNet and EQTransformer based phase pickers on unseen data.
  We determine if existing pre-trained models can satisfactorily be used out of the box for phase picking on waveforms of the GRSN.
Related Results
INTELLIGENT MONITORING SYSTEMS IN MANUFACTURING: CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
INTELLIGENT MONITORING SYSTEMS IN MANUFACTURING: CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES
Intelligent Monitoring Systems (IMS) have emerged as indispensable tools in modern manufacturing, offering real-time insights into production processes, equipment performance, and ...
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
Selection of Injectable Drug Product Composition using Machine Learning Models (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
As of July 2020, a Web of Science search of “machine learning (ML)” nested within the search of “pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics” yielded over 100...
Abstract 660: Pre-symptomatic detection and early treatment of mammary cancer with anti-PD-L1 in a mouse mode
Abstract 660: Pre-symptomatic detection and early treatment of mammary cancer with anti-PD-L1 in a mouse mode
Abstract
Cancer kills ~8M people/year and the WHO predicts an epidemic of cancer in the developing world over the next 20 years due to increased longevity. Developme...
Arrival Picking for Distributed Acoustic Sensing seismic based on fractional lower order statistics
Arrival Picking for Distributed Acoustic Sensing seismic based on fractional lower order statistics
In recent years, fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has been gradually applied to seismology because of its long-distance and dense observation capability. It is a grea...
Design and Simulation Analysis of Mechanical Picking Comb Teeth of Artificial Finger Marigold Flowers
Design and Simulation Analysis of Mechanical Picking Comb Teeth of Artificial Finger Marigold Flowers
As the key component of mechanical picking device of marigold flower, the structure, size, strength and motion of comb are closely related to the reliability and the rate of pickin...
A Study on the Human Factors for an Advanced Picking Station
A Study on the Human Factors for an Advanced Picking Station
Picking activities are usually repetitive and backbreaking physically. Awkward postures can result in muscle fatigue and injuries. For these reasons, Goods to Destination System(GD...
Research on a microseismic signal picking algorithm based on GTOA clustering
Research on a microseismic signal picking algorithm based on GTOA clustering
Abstract. Clustering is one of the challenging problems in machine learning. Adopting clustering methods for the picking of microseismic signals has emerged as a new approach. Howe...
Revalidation process for IMS waveform technologies stations
Revalidation process for IMS waveform technologies stations
S. Bazarragchaa1, P.Martysevich1, A. Kramer1, P. Campus1, A. Molero2, Y.Starovoyt2
1 CTBTO, International Monitoring System Division, Engineering&Development section, Wagra...

