Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Sulphate Removal for Barium Sulphate Scale Mitigation a Deepwater Subsea Production System

View through CrossRef
Abstract Scale control is conventionally achieved by use of chemical inhibitors, introduced to the production system either by squeeze treatment into the reservoir or continual injection into the well. However, as new field developments encounter more challenging production environments or when the associated economic impact of chemical intervention is large (e.g. subsea completed wells with poor chemical placement by bullhead treatments, or limited access to wet subsea wellheads), other methods of scale control such as sulphate removal must be considered during the front end engineering design (FEED) stage. The Greater Plutonio development, lying in deep water (500 – 1600 metres) off the coast of Angola, will be produced via multi-well subsea facilities tied back to a floating production vessel, with reservoir pressure support being provided by seawater injection. Owing to the complex and inaccessible nature of the subsea production system, chemical control of sulphate scale was considered economically unfeasible. Scale control will therefore be achieved by means of sulphate removal prior to seawater injection. However, following conventional sulphate reduction towards 40 ppm there remains a residual scale potential, the impact of which on production is difficult to assess using thermodynamic scale prediction packages or normal laboratory conditions. Periodic squeeze treatments were however still anticipated. A detailed laboratory testing programme of dynamic and static scale formation tests coupled with dynamic core-blocking tests was undertaken to determine the effect of varying production conditions, organic acid content, flow regime and the nature of the underlying substrate on scale formation under field specific conditions for this mildly oversaturated system. The ultimate goal of the laboratory test programme was to define an optimal sulphate level in the injected seawater to prevent scale formation throughout the production lifetime of the field. By comparison of laboratory test results with predicted scale formation tendencies, an acceptable level of sulphate in the injected seawater was determined which would allow pressure support without causing scale formation. This allowed further detailed analysis of the costs associated with a residual scale risk at 40 ppm sulphate (or above) with the costs associated with upgrading the SRP facility to achieve lower levels of sulphate in the injection water. The laboratory work allowed an optimal sulphate concentration to be determined which was achievable through modification of the current design facilities and resulted in a significant cost saving in the development phase.
Title: Sulphate Removal for Barium Sulphate Scale Mitigation a Deepwater Subsea Production System
Description:
Abstract Scale control is conventionally achieved by use of chemical inhibitors, introduced to the production system either by squeeze treatment into the reservoir or continual injection into the well.
However, as new field developments encounter more challenging production environments or when the associated economic impact of chemical intervention is large (e.
g.
subsea completed wells with poor chemical placement by bullhead treatments, or limited access to wet subsea wellheads), other methods of scale control such as sulphate removal must be considered during the front end engineering design (FEED) stage.
The Greater Plutonio development, lying in deep water (500 – 1600 metres) off the coast of Angola, will be produced via multi-well subsea facilities tied back to a floating production vessel, with reservoir pressure support being provided by seawater injection.
Owing to the complex and inaccessible nature of the subsea production system, chemical control of sulphate scale was considered economically unfeasible.
Scale control will therefore be achieved by means of sulphate removal prior to seawater injection.
However, following conventional sulphate reduction towards 40 ppm there remains a residual scale potential, the impact of which on production is difficult to assess using thermodynamic scale prediction packages or normal laboratory conditions.
Periodic squeeze treatments were however still anticipated.
A detailed laboratory testing programme of dynamic and static scale formation tests coupled with dynamic core-blocking tests was undertaken to determine the effect of varying production conditions, organic acid content, flow regime and the nature of the underlying substrate on scale formation under field specific conditions for this mildly oversaturated system.
The ultimate goal of the laboratory test programme was to define an optimal sulphate level in the injected seawater to prevent scale formation throughout the production lifetime of the field.
By comparison of laboratory test results with predicted scale formation tendencies, an acceptable level of sulphate in the injected seawater was determined which would allow pressure support without causing scale formation.
This allowed further detailed analysis of the costs associated with a residual scale risk at 40 ppm sulphate (or above) with the costs associated with upgrading the SRP facility to achieve lower levels of sulphate in the injection water.
The laboratory work allowed an optimal sulphate concentration to be determined which was achievable through modification of the current design facilities and resulted in a significant cost saving in the development phase.

Related Results

Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Implementing Deepwater Subsea Reliability Strategy
Implementing Deepwater Subsea Reliability Strategy
Abstract For more than a decade, subsea technology has been perceived as delivering innovative, reliable and cost effective solutions to oil & gas exploitatio...
Ormen Lange Subsea Production System
Ormen Lange Subsea Production System
Abstract This paper presents the concept and the technical solutions developed and applied to the Ormen Lange subsea production system. First, the key technical c...
Subsea Factory–Standardization of the Brownfield Factory
Subsea Factory–Standardization of the Brownfield Factory
Abstract As part of the corporate technology strategy Statoil has launched a technology plan for the Subsea Factory concept. The plan describes how to combine subsea...
Subsea Facilities
Subsea Facilities
Abstract This paper presents the system design and concept solutions selected for the Ormen Lange subsea facilities. The field is located in a r...
Canyon Express Deepwater Umbilical and Control System: Design and Installation
Canyon Express Deepwater Umbilical and Control System: Design and Installation
Abstract This paper presents an overview of the Canyon Express umbilical and control system which extends 56 miles from a host platform in Main Pass Block 261 to ...
Installation-Driven Field Developments for Deepwater Subsea Projects
Installation-Driven Field Developments for Deepwater Subsea Projects
Abstract At the concept select stage and certainly at the FEED stage of deepwater subsea projects the focus is often exclusively on optimisation of functionality ...
Deepwater Subsea Controls For Completions And Interventions
Deepwater Subsea Controls For Completions And Interventions
Abstract When conducting deepwater interventions, control system reliability is critical for safety valve operation. Consequently, the emerging operational demand...

Back to Top