Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Urk. Barth 1
View through Europeana Collections
Konrad III of Scharfenberg, Bishop of Speyer, giving to the Benedictine monastery
Saint Lambrecht the church in Steinweiler, whose patronage was already in possession of
However, the law of the monastery remains unaffected, with all rights
Episcopal charges to compensate for the economic endowment of the monastery
The second part of the article is about In the future, the Abbot of Lambrecht has the full right to invest
for the church of Steinweiler. The chapter of Speyer and the Archideacon, on
His preposition belongs to the Church, explaining her understanding. Around the Vicara
In Steinweiler they are given the tenth chance to secure sufficient supplies
Archweyer (Archwilre), except for the fields, vineyards and
Meadows. Announcement of the episcopal seal. Witnesses are called:
Clergyman Abbot Wolfram von Weißenburg, Abbot Burkard von Klingenmünster (Klingin),
Abbot Ulrich of Limburg, the Dompropst Otto, the Cathedral Dean Albert, the Cathedral Cellar
Friedrich, the cathedral canon Berthold von Mußbach and Siegfried von Hirrlingen
(Hurningin), the cathedral scholaster Andreas, the cathedral canon Beringer von Entringen
as well as Kuno, Chaplain and Canon of St. Trinitatis, the Speyer Ministries
Chamberlain Albert, the Vogt Anselm, his son Alhelm, the Truchsess Konrad,
Schenk Eberhard, the Marshal Marquard, the other lay persons Siegfried Hobit, who
Brothers Meinhard and Konrad von Dürkheim, Dietrich Schellebelliz aus Steinweiler,
Vogt Walter, brothers Johannes and Egino and Meinboz von Scheibenhard
Heidelberg University Library
Title: Urk. Barth 1
Description:
Konrad III of Scharfenberg, Bishop of Speyer, giving to the Benedictine monastery
Saint Lambrecht the church in Steinweiler, whose patronage was already in possession of
However, the law of the monastery remains unaffected, with all rights
Episcopal charges to compensate for the economic endowment of the monastery
The second part of the article is about In the future, the Abbot of Lambrecht has the full right to invest
for the church of Steinweiler.
The chapter of Speyer and the Archideacon, on
His preposition belongs to the Church, explaining her understanding.
Around the Vicara
In Steinweiler they are given the tenth chance to secure sufficient supplies
Archweyer (Archwilre), except for the fields, vineyards and
Meadows.
Announcement of the episcopal seal.
Witnesses are called:
Clergyman Abbot Wolfram von Weißenburg, Abbot Burkard von Klingenmünster (Klingin),
Abbot Ulrich of Limburg, the Dompropst Otto, the Cathedral Dean Albert, the Cathedral Cellar
Friedrich, the cathedral canon Berthold von Mußbach and Siegfried von Hirrlingen
(Hurningin), the cathedral scholaster Andreas, the cathedral canon Beringer von Entringen
as well as Kuno, Chaplain and Canon of St.
Trinitatis, the Speyer Ministries
Chamberlain Albert, the Vogt Anselm, his son Alhelm, the Truchsess Konrad,
Schenk Eberhard, the Marshal Marquard, the other lay persons Siegfried Hobit, who
Brothers Meinhard and Konrad von Dürkheim, Dietrich Schellebelliz aus Steinweiler,
Vogt Walter, brothers Johannes and Egino and Meinboz von Scheibenhard.
Related Results
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Urk. Barth 64
Urk. Barth 64
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel
Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther,
Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Urk. Barth 63
Urk. Barth 63
The Dielheimer Schultheiß Heinz Dorse and the judges of the local court (Noltel
Hoffmann, son of Noltel Bürgel, Gerhard Bart, Berthold Hanger, Peter Walther,
Heinrich BHeinrich erm...
Barth and Patristic Theology
Barth and Patristic Theology
This chapter examines Barth’s approach to patristic theology as well as his engagement with key doctrines and councils of the patristic era. It is clear in relation to Barth’s use ...

