Javascript must be enabled to continue!
A Generative Prompting Framework for Robust Misinformation Mitigation on Social Platforms
View through CrossRef
Combating the spread of misinformation on social media is a critical challenge. Manual fact-checking is insufficient due to the scale and speed of online information dissemination, while existing Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with up-to-date information and multimodal content. This paper introduces MUSE+, a novel and efficient prompt-based approach for correcting misinformation using LLMs. MUSE+ leverages in-context learning by carefully engineered prompts that define the task, provide context, specify correction guidelines, and include illustrative examples. Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that MUSE+ significantly outperforms GPT-4, the original MUSE model, and even human laypeople in terms of correction quality, as assessed by both quantitative metrics and expert human evaluation. Ablation studies confirm the importance of each prompt component, and further analyses reveal MUSE+'s robustness across misinformation types and prompt variations, alongside its efficient correction generation time. These results highlight the potential of prompt engineering for creating scalable, adaptable, and high-quality misinformation correction systems, offering a promising pathway for mitigating the negative impacts of online misinformation.
Title: A Generative Prompting Framework for Robust Misinformation Mitigation on Social Platforms
Description:
Combating the spread of misinformation on social media is a critical challenge.
Manual fact-checking is insufficient due to the scale and speed of online information dissemination, while existing Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with up-to-date information and multimodal content.
This paper introduces MUSE+, a novel and efficient prompt-based approach for correcting misinformation using LLMs.
MUSE+ leverages in-context learning by carefully engineered prompts that define the task, provide context, specify correction guidelines, and include illustrative examples.
Our experimental evaluation demonstrates that MUSE+ significantly outperforms GPT-4, the original MUSE model, and even human laypeople in terms of correction quality, as assessed by both quantitative metrics and expert human evaluation.
Ablation studies confirm the importance of each prompt component, and further analyses reveal MUSE+'s robustness across misinformation types and prompt variations, alongside its efficient correction generation time.
These results highlight the potential of prompt engineering for creating scalable, adaptable, and high-quality misinformation correction systems, offering a promising pathway for mitigating the negative impacts of online misinformation.
Related Results
Burden of the Beast
Burden of the Beast
Introduction
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and its fluctuating waves of infections and the emergence of new variants, Indigenous populations in Australia and worldwide have re...
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review
Background
Although at present there is broad agreement among researchers, health professionals, and policy makers on the need to control and combat health misi...
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (Preprint)
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Although at present there is broad agreement among researchers, health professionals, and policy makers on the need to control and combat health ...
How the General Public Navigates Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Study of Identification and Response Approaches (Preprint)
How the General Public Navigates Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Study of Identification and Response Approaches (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Social media is widely used by the general public as a source of health information because of its convenience. However, the increasing prevalenc...
Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Misinformation poses a serious challenge to clinical and policy decision-making in the health field. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified interest in ...
Frontline Experiences in Responding to Health Misinformation: Perspectives of Health Educators in Lagos State, Nigeria
Frontline Experiences in Responding to Health Misinformation: Perspectives of Health Educators in Lagos State, Nigeria
Abstract
Introduction
The rapid spread of health misinformation presents a growing challenge for public health systems worldwide. Misinformation can undermine publ...
Understanding Cross-Platform Variability in Misinformation Engagement: Insights From Meta-Owned Platforms
Understanding Cross-Platform Variability in Misinformation Engagement: Insights From Meta-Owned Platforms
The rise of misinformation on social media has been a cause for concern globally. While existing research has focused on individual characteristics that drive misinformation belief...
Breast cancer prevention and treatment misinformation on Twitter: An analysis of two languages
Breast cancer prevention and treatment misinformation on Twitter: An analysis of two languages
Objective
To determine the prevalence and types of misinformation on Twitter related to breast cancer prevention and treatment; and compare the differences betw...

