Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Herbrand's Theorem in Inductive Proofs
View through CrossRef
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.e. as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way. A corresponding cut-elimination method, called schematic CERES, can be used to analyze these proofs, and to extract their (schematic) Herbrand sequents, even though Herbrand’s theorem in general does not hold for proofs with induction inferences. This work focuses on the most crucial part of the schematic cut-elimination method, which is to construct a refutation of a schematic formula that represents the cut-structure of the original proof schema. Moreover, we show that this new formalism allows the extraction of a structure from the refutation schema, called a Herbrand schema, which represents its Herbrand sequent.
Title: Herbrand's Theorem in Inductive Proofs
Description:
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.
e.
as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way.
A corresponding cut-elimination method, called schematic CERES, can be used to analyze these proofs, and to extract their (schematic) Herbrand sequents, even though Herbrand’s theorem in general does not hold for proofs with induction inferences.
This work focuses on the most crucial part of the schematic cut-elimination method, which is to construct a refutation of a schematic formula that represents the cut-structure of the original proof schema.
Moreover, we show that this new formalism allows the extraction of a structure from the refutation schema, called a Herbrand schema, which represents its Herbrand sequent.
Related Results
An abstract form of the first epsilon theorem
An abstract form of the first epsilon theorem
Abstract
We present a new method of computing Herbrand disjunctions. The up-to-date most direct approach to calculate Herbrand disjunctions is based on Hilbert’s eps...
Extracting Herbrand systems from refutation schemata
Extracting Herbrand systems from refutation schemata
Abstract
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.e. as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way. A corresponding cu...
Herbrand’s theorem
Herbrand’s theorem
According to Herbrand’s theorem, each formula F of quantification theory can be associated with a sequence F1, F2, F3,… of quantifier-free formulas such that F is provable just in ...
Inductive * -Semirings
Inductive * -Semirings
One of the most well-known induction principles in computer science<br />is the fixed point induction rule, or least pre-fixed point rule. Inductive <br />*-semirings a...
Can a computer proof be elegant?
Can a computer proof be elegant?
In computer science, proofs about computer algorithms are par for the course. Proofs
by
computer algorithms, on the other hand, are not so readily accepted....
VIRTUAL CONTACT POINT METHOD.
SIDE MILL GENERATING A CYLINDRICAL HELICAL SURFACE
VIRTUAL CONTACT POINT METHOD.
SIDE MILL GENERATING A CYLINDRICAL HELICAL SURFACE
Cylindrical helical surfaces with constant pitch can be generated using tools bounded by primary peripheral surfaces of revolution, such as side mills, end mills, cylindrical plani...
Formalizing Ideals of Proof
Formalizing Ideals of Proof
Two broad observations lie at the basis of this dissertation, that finds itself at the intersection between philosophy, mathematics and proof theory. The first one is that mathemat...
ON SKOLEMIZATION AND PROOF COMPLEXITY
ON SKOLEMIZATION AND PROOF COMPLEXITY
The impact of Skolemization on the complexity of proofs in the sequent calculus is investigated. It is shown that prefix Skolemization may result in a nonelementary increase of Her...

