Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Herbrand's Theorem in Inductive Proofs
View through CrossRef
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.e. as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way. A corresponding cut-elimination method, called schematic CERES, can be used to analyze these proofs, and to extract their (schematic) Herbrand sequents, even though Herbrand’s theorem in general does not hold for proofs with induction inferences. This work focuses on the most crucial part of the schematic cut-elimination method, which is to construct a refutation of a schematic formula that represents the cut-structure of the original proof schema. Moreover, we show that this new formalism allows the extraction of a structure from the refutation schema, called a Herbrand schema, which represents its Herbrand sequent.
Title: Herbrand's Theorem in Inductive Proofs
Description:
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.
e.
as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way.
A corresponding cut-elimination method, called schematic CERES, can be used to analyze these proofs, and to extract their (schematic) Herbrand sequents, even though Herbrand’s theorem in general does not hold for proofs with induction inferences.
This work focuses on the most crucial part of the schematic cut-elimination method, which is to construct a refutation of a schematic formula that represents the cut-structure of the original proof schema.
Moreover, we show that this new formalism allows the extraction of a structure from the refutation schema, called a Herbrand schema, which represents its Herbrand sequent.
Related Results
An abstract form of the first epsilon theorem
An abstract form of the first epsilon theorem
Abstract
We present a new method of computing Herbrand disjunctions. The up-to-date most direct approach to calculate Herbrand disjunctions is based on Hilbert’s eps...
Extracting Herbrand systems from refutation schemata
Extracting Herbrand systems from refutation schemata
Abstract
An inductive proof can be represented as a proof schema, i.e. as a parameterized sequence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way. A corresponding cu...
Herbrand’s theorem
Herbrand’s theorem
According to Herbrand’s theorem, each formula F of quantification theory can be associated with a sequence F1, F2, F3,… of quantifier-free formulas such that F is provable just in ...
Can a computer proof be elegant?
Can a computer proof be elegant?
In computer science, proofs about computer algorithms are par for the course. Proofs
by
computer algorithms, on the other hand, are not so readily accepted....
Proof by analogy in mural
Proof by analogy in mural
Abstract
An important advantage of using a formal method of developing software is that one can prove that development steps are correct with respect to their specificati...
ON SKOLEMIZATION AND PROOF COMPLEXITY
ON SKOLEMIZATION AND PROOF COMPLEXITY
The impact of Skolemization on the complexity of proofs in the sequent calculus is investigated. It is shown that prefix Skolemization may result in a nonelementary increase of Her...
On Proof Schemata and Primitive Recursive Arithmetic
On Proof Schemata and Primitive Recursive Arithmetic
Inductive proofs can be represented as a proof schemata, i.e. as a parameterized se- quence of proofs defined in a primitive recursive way. Applications of proof schemata can be fo...
EXPLORING PROOFS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
EXPLORING PROOFS OF THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
The Pythagorean Theorem has been a cornerstone of mathematics since its discovery, offering profound insights and practical applications across various fields. This paper explores ...

