Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Translating the Law in the Inns of Court Play Gismond of Salerne (1566–68)

View through CrossRef
Abstract: Gismond of Salerne (1566–68) was a dramatic adaptation of Giovanni Boccaccio’s Tancredi and Ghismunda novella produced at the Inner Temple. Positing that the legal background of the authors was reflected in their reception of Boccaccio, this essay investigates the representation and use of various significations of the law in the play. It argues that the Inns authors were receptive to the presence of the Natural Law concept in the background of Boccaccio’s novella and that they intensified its role in the play, emphasizing its conflict with man-made law. The latter is also investigated in its own right, showing its impact on a thematic, rhetorical, and dramaturgical level. Further, the Inns writers’ political interests as members of a community revolving around common law explain why the play idealizes and justifies specific legal notions and practices.
Title: Translating the Law in the Inns of Court Play Gismond of Salerne (1566–68)
Description:
Abstract: Gismond of Salerne (1566–68) was a dramatic adaptation of Giovanni Boccaccio’s Tancredi and Ghismunda novella produced at the Inner Temple.
Positing that the legal background of the authors was reflected in their reception of Boccaccio, this essay investigates the representation and use of various significations of the law in the play.
It argues that the Inns authors were receptive to the presence of the Natural Law concept in the background of Boccaccio’s novella and that they intensified its role in the play, emphasizing its conflict with man-made law.
The latter is also investigated in its own right, showing its impact on a thematic, rhetorical, and dramaturgical level.
Further, the Inns writers’ political interests as members of a community revolving around common law explain why the play idealizes and justifies specific legal notions and practices.

Related Results

On the Status of Rights
On the Status of Rights
Photo by Patrick Tomasso on Unsplash ABSTRACT In cases where the law conflicts with bioethics, the status of rights must be determined to resolve some of the tensions. ...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
Analysis of the Constitutional Court Cases in 2022
The Constitutional Court received a total of 2,829 cases in 2022 alone. Among the decisions made by the Constitutional Court in 2022, this paper reviews major decisions centered on...
The Future of Securities Law in the Supreme Court
The Future of Securities Law in the Supreme Court
Since the enactment of the first federal securities statute in 1933, securities law has illustrated key shifts in the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. During the New Deal, the Court’...
Atypical business law provisions
Atypical business law provisions
The article is devoted to the vision of atypical business law provisions. It was found that the state of scientific opinion regarding atypical business law provisions is irrelevant...
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
To Ban or Not to Ban : The Supreme Court and Obscenity
Since 1957, the United States Supreme Court has exhibited a marked shift in its attitude toward freedom of expression. This shift may be directly attributed to changes in the Court...
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
Amar Putusan Pada Kewenangan Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi
The Constitutional Court as an Indonesian state institution in the judicial review of the law against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia has been regulated by Law N...
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
The Principle of Appeals on Points of Law
Regarding the structure of criminal appeals, the judicial precedent establishes the principle of ‘appeals on points of fact,’ which stipulates that the court of the second instance...

Back to Top