Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Exploring Public Sentiment Toward Artificial Intelligence Apps: A Case Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek in Google Apps

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed rapid advancements in recent decades, impacting various sectors such as business, education, and entertainment. AI-based applications have become integral to daily interactions, with platforms like Google hosting popular applications such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. These AI applications offer distinct approaches to technology but have the potential to influence public sentiment toward AI broadly. However, public perception remains diverse, with some embracing AI for its potential, while others express concerns regarding its implications, such as job displacement and privacy issues. Objectives: This study aims to explore the factors that shape public sentiment toward three AI applications—ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Specifically, it addresses the following research questions: (1) What factors influence public sentiment toward these AI applications? (2) How do the sentiments differ between these applications? (3) To what extent is public sentiment reflective of broader perceptions of AI technology? Methods: The research employs a case study approach, collecting user reviews from Google Play Store for ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Data preprocessing includes removing null entries, normalizing text, and performing tokenization. Sentiment classification is conducted using the Ekman’s Six Basic Emotions model, and sentiment analysis is enhanced using machine learning models, specifically Naive Bayes (NB) and Logistic Regression (LR). The models’ performance is evaluated based on AUC, Classification Accuracy (CA), F1 Score, Precision, Recall, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). Results: The analysis reveals that User Interaction and App Performance are the primary factors influencing public sentiment. ChatGPT receives the highest level of positive sentiment, particularly for its interactive capabilities. While Gemini also receives favorable reviews, its focus on intelligent search results in slightly less positive sentiment compared to ChatGPT. DeepSeek displays a more mixed sentiment, with some users appreciating its depth in data analysis, but many expressing dissatisfaction with its user interaction. Sentiment analysis further demonstrates that Joy and Surprise were the dominant emotions for ChatGPT, whereas Fear and Disgust were less prevalent across all applications. Conclusions: This study concludes that user interaction and performance significantly drive public sentiment toward AI applications. While concerns over security and privacy exist, they are less influential compared to the experience users have with the application's functionality. The findings highlight the importance of enhancing user experience and performance for AI adoption. Additionally, the research provides insights into the need for further transparency regarding data privacy and the ethical use of AI.
Title: Exploring Public Sentiment Toward Artificial Intelligence Apps: A Case Study of ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek in Google Apps
Description:
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has witnessed rapid advancements in recent decades, impacting various sectors such as business, education, and entertainment.
AI-based applications have become integral to daily interactions, with platforms like Google hosting popular applications such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek.
These AI applications offer distinct approaches to technology but have the potential to influence public sentiment toward AI broadly.
However, public perception remains diverse, with some embracing AI for its potential, while others express concerns regarding its implications, such as job displacement and privacy issues.
Objectives: This study aims to explore the factors that shape public sentiment toward three AI applications—ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek.
Specifically, it addresses the following research questions: (1) What factors influence public sentiment toward these AI applications? (2) How do the sentiments differ between these applications? (3) To what extent is public sentiment reflective of broader perceptions of AI technology? Methods: The research employs a case study approach, collecting user reviews from Google Play Store for ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek.
Data preprocessing includes removing null entries, normalizing text, and performing tokenization.
Sentiment classification is conducted using the Ekman’s Six Basic Emotions model, and sentiment analysis is enhanced using machine learning models, specifically Naive Bayes (NB) and Logistic Regression (LR).
The models’ performance is evaluated based on AUC, Classification Accuracy (CA), F1 Score, Precision, Recall, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC).
Results: The analysis reveals that User Interaction and App Performance are the primary factors influencing public sentiment.
ChatGPT receives the highest level of positive sentiment, particularly for its interactive capabilities.
While Gemini also receives favorable reviews, its focus on intelligent search results in slightly less positive sentiment compared to ChatGPT.
DeepSeek displays a more mixed sentiment, with some users appreciating its depth in data analysis, but many expressing dissatisfaction with its user interaction.
Sentiment analysis further demonstrates that Joy and Surprise were the dominant emotions for ChatGPT, whereas Fear and Disgust were less prevalent across all applications.
Conclusions: This study concludes that user interaction and performance significantly drive public sentiment toward AI applications.
While concerns over security and privacy exist, they are less influential compared to the experience users have with the application's functionality.
The findings highlight the importance of enhancing user experience and performance for AI adoption.
Additionally, the research provides insights into the need for further transparency regarding data privacy and the ethical use of AI.

Related Results

Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Exploring Large Language Models Integration in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Skin Diseases: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction The exact manner in which large language models (LLMs) will be integrated into pathology is not yet fully comprehended. This study examines the accuracy, bene...
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Assessment of Chat-GPT, Gemini, and Perplexity in Principle of Research Publication: A Comparative Study
Abstract Introduction Many researchers utilize artificial intelligence (AI) to aid their research endeavors. This study seeks to assess and contrast the performance of three sophis...
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
ChatGPT's Capabilities for Use in Anatomy Education and Anatomy Research
Dear Editors, Recently, the discussion of an artificial intelligence (AI) - fueled platform in several articles in your journal has attracted the attention of many researchers [1, ...
Unlocking Educational Potential: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Sustainable Engagement with ChatGPT Using the ECM Model
Unlocking Educational Potential: Exploring Students’ Satisfaction and Sustainable Engagement with ChatGPT Using the ECM Model
Aim/Purpose: The main goal of this study is to investigate the factors affecting students’ satisfaction and continuous usage of ChatGPT in an educational context, using the Expecta...
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract The increasing popularity and advent of newer, better and relevant application programs (apps) has made smart phones an important source of healthcare infor...
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recommends 150-300 minutes of physical activity per week to lower health risks caused by sedentary behavior. Incorp...

Back to Top