Javascript must be enabled to continue!
BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY’S ROLE AND INFLUENCE IN THE EXCLUSION OF GREECE AND TÜRKIYE FROM NATO, 1948–1949
View through CrossRef
When NATO was created on 4 April 1949 by the United States, Britain, Canada, and several Western European countries with the aim tocontain the Soviet Union’s expansion of power, it was rather peculiar that Greece and Türkiye were excluded, while their Mediterranean neighbour, Italy, was included in this new military organisation. As Greece suffered from the communist insurgents in the Greek Civil War (1946–1949), and Türkiye was unceasingly under Soviet military and diplomatic threat over the provinces of Kars and Ardahan and the Turkish Straits settlements (1946–1953), both seemingly had valid reasons for being included in NATO. However, Britain, one of the renowned founding members of NATO, determinedly repudiated to invite Greece and Türkiye to join NATO. This paper analyses the reasons for Britain to deny these countries NATO membership. The existing literature on this exclusion subject argues that the geographical location and the forthcoming Mediterranean Pact were two apparent causes that influenced Britain to reject Greece and Türkiye’s NATO membership. This paper however, investigates other rejection reasons that have yet to be studied by previous scholars. This paper offers an analysis of Britain’s objections to Greece and Türkiye’s NATO membership during NATO’s creation years through the study of British primary historical records. The finding shows that Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin was eager to have NATO promptly formed, and he believed the proposal for Greece and Türkiye’s inclusion in NATO would hamper this aim, since these two countries were in a dispute over Cyprus. Bevin reckoned that the bitter relationship between Greece and Türkiye over Cyprus would alarm the delegations, hence prolonging the discussions that would lead to further postponement of NATO’s ratification. Thus, Bevin’s démarche was not to propose the inclusion of Greece and Türkiye in NATO at the time.
UUM Press, Universiti Utara Malaysia
Title: BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY’S ROLE AND INFLUENCE IN THE EXCLUSION OF GREECE AND TÜRKIYE FROM NATO, 1948–1949
Description:
When NATO was created on 4 April 1949 by the United States, Britain, Canada, and several Western European countries with the aim tocontain the Soviet Union’s expansion of power, it was rather peculiar that Greece and Türkiye were excluded, while their Mediterranean neighbour, Italy, was included in this new military organisation.
As Greece suffered from the communist insurgents in the Greek Civil War (1946–1949), and Türkiye was unceasingly under Soviet military and diplomatic threat over the provinces of Kars and Ardahan and the Turkish Straits settlements (1946–1953), both seemingly had valid reasons for being included in NATO.
However, Britain, one of the renowned founding members of NATO, determinedly repudiated to invite Greece and Türkiye to join NATO.
This paper analyses the reasons for Britain to deny these countries NATO membership.
The existing literature on this exclusion subject argues that the geographical location and the forthcoming Mediterranean Pact were two apparent causes that influenced Britain to reject Greece and Türkiye’s NATO membership.
This paper however, investigates other rejection reasons that have yet to be studied by previous scholars.
This paper offers an analysis of Britain’s objections to Greece and Türkiye’s NATO membership during NATO’s creation years through the study of British primary historical records.
The finding shows that Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin was eager to have NATO promptly formed, and he believed the proposal for Greece and Türkiye’s inclusion in NATO would hamper this aim, since these two countries were in a dispute over Cyprus.
Bevin reckoned that the bitter relationship between Greece and Türkiye over Cyprus would alarm the delegations, hence prolonging the discussions that would lead to further postponement of NATO’s ratification.
Thus, Bevin’s démarche was not to propose the inclusion of Greece and Türkiye in NATO at the time.
.
Related Results
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
Cometary Physics Laboratory: spectrophotometric experiments
<p><strong><span dir="ltr" role="presentation">1. Introduction</span></strong&...
Legal principles of international cooperation between Ukraine and the North Atlantic alliance
Legal principles of international cooperation between Ukraine and the North Atlantic alliance
The article analyzes the legal principles of Ukraine’s international cooperation with NATO and the European Union.The Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of 1993 «Main Dire...
TÜRKİYE-İRAN GÖÇ SİSTEMİ: SÜREKLİLİK VE DEĞİŞİMLER
TÜRKİYE-İRAN GÖÇ SİSTEMİ: SÜREKLİLİK VE DEĞİŞİMLER
Amaç: Son yıllarda Türkiye’ye dair göç çalışmalarında ciddi bir artış gözlense de Türkiye-İran göç koridoruna dair araştırmalar sınırlı sayıdadır. Bu makalede Türkiye-İran Göç sist...
Historical Dictionary of NATO and Other International Security Organizations
Historical Dictionary of NATO and Other International Security Organizations
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is a military alliance established by the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty on April 4, 1949. The treaty was signed by Belgium, the...
TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ DIŞ POLİTİKASINA GENEL BAKIŞ 1923-1960
TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ DIŞ POLİTİKASINA GENEL BAKIŞ 1923-1960
1923-1938 Atatürk dönemi dış politikasını bağlantısız bir dış politika diye nitelendirebiliriz. Bu dönemde Türkiye hiçbir büyük güce kendisini bağımlı hissetmemiştir. Zaten dünya e...
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
Insufficiency of informal alignment: why did Finland choose formal NATO membership?
Insufficiency of informal alignment: why did Finland choose formal NATO membership?
Abstract
In May 2022, less than three months after Russia started its war of aggression against Ukraine, both Finland and Sweden applied for membership in NATO, ther...

