Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Recourse against Decisions to Apply or Extend Pre-Trial Detention

View through CrossRef
According to Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, “everyone deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall have the right to take proceedings before a court so that the court may decide within a short time on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if his detention is not lawful.” Thus, national authorities must exercise the utmost diligence to ensure that the defendant’s right to an effective remedy is respected in the procedure for applying or replacing pre-trial detention or house arrest against the defendant. To respect all the guarantees provided for by law, the national regulatory framework must be predictable and explicit release if the detention is unlawful. Thus, national authorities must exercise the utmost diligence to ensure that the defendant’s right to an effective remedy is respected in the procedure for applying or replacing pre-trial detention or house arrest against the defendant. To respect all the guarantees provided by law, the national regulatory framework must be predictable and explicit.
Title: Recourse against Decisions to Apply or Extend Pre-Trial Detention
Description:
According to Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, “everyone deprived of his liberty by arrest or detention shall have the right to take proceedings before a court so that the court may decide within a short time on the lawfulness of his detention and order his release if his detention is not lawful.
” Thus, national authorities must exercise the utmost diligence to ensure that the defendant’s right to an effective remedy is respected in the procedure for applying or replacing pre-trial detention or house arrest against the defendant.
To respect all the guarantees provided for by law, the national regulatory framework must be predictable and explicit release if the detention is unlawful.
Thus, national authorities must exercise the utmost diligence to ensure that the defendant’s right to an effective remedy is respected in the procedure for applying or replacing pre-trial detention or house arrest against the defendant.
To respect all the guarantees provided by law, the national regulatory framework must be predictable and explicit.

Related Results

The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Detention
The Impact of COVID-19 on Immigration Detention
COVID-19 has spread quickly through immigration detention facilities in the United States. As of December 2, 2020, there have been over 7,500 confirmed COVID-19 cases among detaine...
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Clinical tria...
Detention
Detention
Abstract The term detention refers to that part of the juvenile justice system that handles youths between the time of their arrest and court hearings. Detention cen...
Post-Border Futures: Unconstructing Detention Architectures
Post-Border Futures: Unconstructing Detention Architectures
Building on both the knowledges of communities engaged in anti-detention activism and of the spatial practices and disciplines of architecture, this paper proposes that critical sp...
Investigating Food Quality, Safety and Sanitation in Chinese Detention Centers: A Qualitative StudyEric Zihan Ling
Investigating Food Quality, Safety and Sanitation in Chinese Detention Centers: A Qualitative StudyEric Zihan Ling
This study investigates food quality and sanitation practices in Chinese detention centers. Due to their isolated nature, Detention Centers are vulnerable to contagious disease out...
Community Integrated Care Team- Detention Order Outcomes And Indications
Community Integrated Care Team- Detention Order Outcomes And Indications
Abstract Background Detention orders are the inherent jurisdiction of the high court. Only mechanism to support treatment in tho...
Behavioural Optimisation To Address Trial Conduct Challenges: Case Study In The UK-REBOA Trial
Behavioural Optimisation To Address Trial Conduct Challenges: Case Study In The UK-REBOA Trial
Abstract Background: Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiti...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...

Back to Top