Javascript must be enabled to continue!
The 2019 eruptive phase of Stromboli volcano through multiparametric geophysical observations.
View through CrossRef
<p>In summer 2019, two paroxysmal explosions occurred in Stromboli. The first one occurred on July 3, when the Strombolian ordinary eruptive activity did not show a significant intensification. The explosion formed an eruptive column more than 3 km high. A pyroclastic flow ran down the &#8220;Sciara del Fuoco&#8221; slope causing a victim and some injuries. Moreover, the pyroclastic flow spread over the sea surface for about one kilometer. On August 28, a second paroxysmal explosion occurred, similar to the previous one. Also in this case the eruption formed an eruptive column of more than 3 km and a pyroclastic flow that expanded along the &#8220;Sciara del Fuoco&#8221; slope and traveled about 1 km on the sea surface. In the period between the two paroxysms, effusive activity occurred from the summit crater area. The eruptive phase of summer 2019, which began with the paroxysm of 3 July, was not preceded by significant changes in the routinely monitored parameters, such as the hourly frequency (daily average) of the VLP events (typical of Stromboli) and the amplitude of the seismic signal (RSAM). For this reason, we have analyzed the seismic and dilatometric data, which were recorded by the INGV geophysical network in the period November 2018 - September 2019, focusing our attention on other parameters that can give indications on the activity state of the volcano. In particular, we analyzed the data of the broadband seismic stations, equipped with the Guralp CMG40T sensors, and the data of one Sacks-Evertson borehole strainmeter. We defined the "VLP size", which takes into account the waveform of the VLP events, in terms of both amplitude and duration. We also applied time varying Fractal Dimension (FD) analysis to the seismograms of a seismic station close to the crater area and we analyzed the polarization of the same signal. We carried out the polarization analysis both without applying a filter and by filtering the seismic signal in the typical frequency bands of the Stromboli volcanic tremor (1-3 Hz) and of the VLPs (0.5-0.05 Hz). We found that the "VLP size", the FD and the polarization parameters showed significant changes about one month before the paroxysm of July 3. In the short term, we applied an appropriately tuned STA/LTA algorithm to the data of the borehole strainmeter, which is installed on the island at about 2km from the craters, and we obtained an automatic detection of the paroxysmal events 10 and 7.5 minutes before the explosion of July 3 and August 28, respectively.</p>
Title: The 2019 eruptive phase of Stromboli volcano through multiparametric geophysical observations.
Description:
<p>In summer 2019, two paroxysmal explosions occurred in Stromboli.
The first one occurred on July 3, when the Strombolian ordinary eruptive activity did not show a significant intensification.
The explosion formed an eruptive column more than 3 km high.
A pyroclastic flow ran down the &#8220;Sciara del Fuoco&#8221; slope causing a victim and some injuries.
Moreover, the pyroclastic flow spread over the sea surface for about one kilometer.
On August 28, a second paroxysmal explosion occurred, similar to the previous one.
Also in this case the eruption formed an eruptive column of more than 3 km and a pyroclastic flow that expanded along the &#8220;Sciara del Fuoco&#8221; slope and traveled about 1 km on the sea surface.
In the period between the two paroxysms, effusive activity occurred from the summit crater area.
The eruptive phase of summer 2019, which began with the paroxysm of 3 July, was not preceded by significant changes in the routinely monitored parameters, such as the hourly frequency (daily average) of the VLP events (typical of Stromboli) and the amplitude of the seismic signal (RSAM).
For this reason, we have analyzed the seismic and dilatometric data, which were recorded by the INGV geophysical network in the period November 2018 - September 2019, focusing our attention on other parameters that can give indications on the activity state of the volcano.
In particular, we analyzed the data of the broadband seismic stations, equipped with the Guralp CMG40T sensors, and the data of one Sacks-Evertson borehole strainmeter.
We defined the "VLP size", which takes into account the waveform of the VLP events, in terms of both amplitude and duration.
We also applied time varying Fractal Dimension (FD) analysis to the seismograms of a seismic station close to the crater area and we analyzed the polarization of the same signal.
We carried out the polarization analysis both without applying a filter and by filtering the seismic signal in the typical frequency bands of the Stromboli volcanic tremor (1-3 Hz) and of the VLPs (0.
5-0.
05 Hz).
We found that the "VLP size", the FD and the polarization parameters showed significant changes about one month before the paroxysm of July 3.
In the short term, we applied an appropriately tuned STA/LTA algorithm to the data of the borehole strainmeter, which is installed on the island at about 2km from the craters, and we obtained an automatic detection of the paroxysmal events 10 and 7.
5 minutes before the explosion of July 3 and August 28, respectively.
</p>.
Related Results
On the mechanism stromboli
On the mechanism stromboli
Abstract
Stromboli and Masaya stand alone, so far as observation has yet gone, amongst the volcanic vents of our planet, in the remarkable characteristic of havin...
The 2020 Activity of Kamchatkan Volcanoes and Danger to Aviation
The 2020 Activity of Kamchatkan Volcanoes and Danger to Aviation
<p>Strong explosive eruptions of volcanoes are the most dangerous for aircraft because they can produce in a few hours or days to the atmosphere and the stratosphere ...
Modelling inter-event times from central volcanoes at São Miguel Island (Azores)
Modelling inter-event times from central volcanoes at São Miguel Island (Azores)
Central volcanoes can produce a wide spectrum of volcanic eruptions, with different magmatic compositions, styles, sizes, and recurrence periods. On volcanic islands, the eruptive ...
Insights from CO2/SO2 gas molar ratio variations and distribution at Stromboli volcano
Insights from CO2/SO2 gas molar ratio variations and distribution at Stromboli volcano
Gas-sensor-based monitoring stations (aka MultiGAS) near degassing volcanic vents sensibly increased the sampling rate of gas composition measurements. In particular, the CO2/SO2 g...
A Neural-based Algorithm for Landslide Detection at Stromboli Volcano: Preliminary Results
A Neural-based Algorithm for Landslide Detection at Stromboli Volcano: Preliminary Results
This study presents a neural-based algorithm for the automatic detection of landslides on Stromboli volcano (Italy). It has been shown that landslides are an important short-term p...
Implementation of machine learning approaches to monitor pre-eruptive swarms at Piton de la Fournaise volcano
Implementation of machine learning approaches to monitor pre-eruptive swarms at Piton de la Fournaise volcano
Eruptions of Piton de la Fournaise volcano (Reunion Island, France) are preceded by intense pre-eruptive seismicity swarms characterized by hundreds, or even thousands of micro ear...
Characteristics of the beginning of the 2019 eruptive crisis at Ubinas volcano (Peru)
Characteristics of the beginning of the 2019 eruptive crisis at Ubinas volcano (Peru)
Ubinas volcano has produced moderate explosive eruptions during the last
~500 years. With 26 eruptive periods, this composite
cone is the most active volcano in Peru. The 2006–2009...
Sequence of Volcanic Activity of Sakurajima Volcano, Japan, as Revealed by Non-Eruptive Deflation
Sequence of Volcanic Activity of Sakurajima Volcano, Japan, as Revealed by Non-Eruptive Deflation
Mechanisms that control fluctuation of long-term eruptive activity are not well understood. Since 1955, Sakurajima volcano has experienced repeated Vulcanian eruptions accompanied ...

