Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Exploring the Possible Use of AI Chatbots in Public Health Education: Feasibility Study (Preprint)
View through CrossRef
BACKGROUND
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field with the potential to transform various aspects of health care and public health, including medical training. During the “Hygiene and Public Health” course for fifth-year medical students, a practical training session was conducted on vaccination using AI chatbots as an educational supportive tool. Before receiving specific training on vaccination, the students were given a web-based test extracted from the Italian National Medical Residency Test. After completing the test, a critical correction of each question was performed assisted by AI chatbots.
OBJECTIVE
The main aim of this study was to identify whether AI chatbots can be considered educational support tools for training in public health. The secondary objective was to assess the performance of different AI chatbots on complex multiple-choice medical questions in the Italian language.
METHODS
A test composed of 15 multiple-choice questions on vaccination was extracted from the Italian National Medical Residency Test using targeted keywords and administered to medical students via Google Forms and to different AI chatbot models (Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Chatsonic, Google Bard, and YouChat). The correction of the test was conducted in the classroom, focusing on the critical evaluation of the explanations provided by the chatbot. A Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to compare the performances of medical students and AI chatbots. Student feedback was collected anonymously at the end of the training experience.
RESULTS
In total, 36 medical students and 5 AI chatbot models completed the test. The students achieved an average score of 8.22 (SD 2.65) out of 15, while the AI chatbots scored an average of 12.22 (SD 2.77). The results indicated a statistically significant difference in performance between the 2 groups (U=49.5, <i>P</i><.001), with a large effect size (r=0.69). When divided by question type (direct, scenario-based, and negative), significant differences were observed in direct (<i>P</i><.001) and scenario-based (<i>P</i><.001) questions, but not in negative questions (<i>P</i>=.48). The students reported a high level of satisfaction (7.9/10) with the educational experience, expressing a strong desire to repeat the experience (7.6/10).
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated the efficacy of AI chatbots in answering complex medical questions related to vaccination and providing valuable educational support. Their performance significantly surpassed that of medical students in direct and scenario-based questions. The responsible and critical use of AI chatbots can enhance medical education, making it an essential aspect to integrate into the educational system.
JMIR Publications Inc.
Title: Exploring the Possible Use of AI Chatbots in Public Health Education: Feasibility Study (Preprint)
Description:
BACKGROUND
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly developing field with the potential to transform various aspects of health care and public health, including medical training.
During the “Hygiene and Public Health” course for fifth-year medical students, a practical training session was conducted on vaccination using AI chatbots as an educational supportive tool.
Before receiving specific training on vaccination, the students were given a web-based test extracted from the Italian National Medical Residency Test.
After completing the test, a critical correction of each question was performed assisted by AI chatbots.
OBJECTIVE
The main aim of this study was to identify whether AI chatbots can be considered educational support tools for training in public health.
The secondary objective was to assess the performance of different AI chatbots on complex multiple-choice medical questions in the Italian language.
METHODS
A test composed of 15 multiple-choice questions on vaccination was extracted from the Italian National Medical Residency Test using targeted keywords and administered to medical students via Google Forms and to different AI chatbot models (Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Chatsonic, Google Bard, and YouChat).
The correction of the test was conducted in the classroom, focusing on the critical evaluation of the explanations provided by the chatbot.
A Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to compare the performances of medical students and AI chatbots.
Student feedback was collected anonymously at the end of the training experience.
RESULTS
In total, 36 medical students and 5 AI chatbot models completed the test.
The students achieved an average score of 8.
22 (SD 2.
65) out of 15, while the AI chatbots scored an average of 12.
22 (SD 2.
77).
The results indicated a statistically significant difference in performance between the 2 groups (U=49.
5, <i>P</i><.
001), with a large effect size (r=0.
69).
When divided by question type (direct, scenario-based, and negative), significant differences were observed in direct (<i>P</i><.
001) and scenario-based (<i>P</i><.
001) questions, but not in negative questions (<i>P</i>=.
48).
The students reported a high level of satisfaction (7.
9/10) with the educational experience, expressing a strong desire to repeat the experience (7.
6/10).
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrated the efficacy of AI chatbots in answering complex medical questions related to vaccination and providing valuable educational support.
Their performance significantly surpassed that of medical students in direct and scenario-based questions.
The responsible and critical use of AI chatbots can enhance medical education, making it an essential aspect to integrate into the educational system.
Related Results
Assessing the quality and readability of patient education materials on chemotherapy cardiotoxicity from artificial intelligence chatbots: An observational cross-sectional study
Assessing the quality and readability of patient education materials on chemotherapy cardiotoxicity from artificial intelligence chatbots: An observational cross-sectional study
Artificial intelligence (AI) and the introduction of Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots have become a common source of patient inquiry in healthcare. The quality and readability o...
AI Chatbots and Psychotherapy: A Match Made in Heaven?
AI Chatbots and Psychotherapy: A Match Made in Heaven?
Dear Editor,
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing psychotherapy by combating its inaccessibility.1 AI chatbots and conversational agents are among the most promising int...
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study (Preprint)
User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-sectional Survey Study (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, AI-powered chatbots, such as Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (Cha...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below:
RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Review of chatbots in urogynecology
Review of chatbots in urogynecology
Purpose of review
Chatbots based on large language models have been rapidly incorporated into many aspects of medicine in a short time despite an incomplete understandi...
The Digital Therapeutic Alliance With Mental Health Chatbots: Diary Study and Thematic Analysis (Preprint)
The Digital Therapeutic Alliance With Mental Health Chatbots: Diary Study and Thematic Analysis (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Mental health chatbots are increasingly used to address the global mental health treatment gap by offering scalable, accessible, and anonymous su...
Improving Students' Linguistic Competence through Chatbots
Improving Students' Linguistic Competence through Chatbots
This study explores chatbots' influence on English linguistic competence and examines students' experiences with chatbots for language development in an educational institution in ...
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Housing Improvements for Health and Associated Socio‐Economic Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Poor housing is associated with poor health. This suggests that improving housing conditions might lead to improved health for residents. This review searched widely for studies fr...

