Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Spam Mobile Apps
View through CrossRef
The increased popularity of smartphones has attracted a large number of developers to offer various applications for the different smartphone platforms via the respective app markets. One consequence of this popularity is that the app markets are also becoming populated with spam apps. These spam apps reduce the users’ quality of experience and increase the workload of app market operators to identify these apps and remove them. Spam apps can come in many forms such as apps not having a specific functionality, those having unrelated app descriptions or unrelated keywords, or similar apps being made available several times and across diverse categories. Market operators maintain antispam policies and apps are removed through continuous monitoring. Through a systematic crawl of a popular app market and by identifying apps that were removed over a period of time, we propose a method to detect spam apps solely using app metadata available at the time of publication. We first propose a methodology to manually label a sample of removed apps, according to a set of checkpoint heuristics that reveal the reasons behind removal. This analysis suggests that approximately 35% of the apps being removed are very likely to be spam apps. We then map the identified heuristics to several quantifiable features and show how distinguishing these features are for spam apps. We build an
Adaptive Boost
classifier for early identification of spam apps using only the metadata of the apps. Our classifier achieves an accuracy of over 95% with precision varying between 85% and 95% and recall varying between 38% and 98%. We further show that a limited number of features, in the range of 10--30, generated from app metadata is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of performance. On a set of 180,627 apps that were present at the app market during our crawl, our classifier predicts 2.7% of the apps as potential spam. Finally, we perform additional manual verification and show that human reviewers agree with 82% of our classifier predictions.
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Title: Spam Mobile Apps
Description:
The increased popularity of smartphones has attracted a large number of developers to offer various applications for the different smartphone platforms via the respective app markets.
One consequence of this popularity is that the app markets are also becoming populated with spam apps.
These spam apps reduce the users’ quality of experience and increase the workload of app market operators to identify these apps and remove them.
Spam apps can come in many forms such as apps not having a specific functionality, those having unrelated app descriptions or unrelated keywords, or similar apps being made available several times and across diverse categories.
Market operators maintain antispam policies and apps are removed through continuous monitoring.
Through a systematic crawl of a popular app market and by identifying apps that were removed over a period of time, we propose a method to detect spam apps solely using app metadata available at the time of publication.
We first propose a methodology to manually label a sample of removed apps, according to a set of checkpoint heuristics that reveal the reasons behind removal.
This analysis suggests that approximately 35% of the apps being removed are very likely to be spam apps.
We then map the identified heuristics to several quantifiable features and show how distinguishing these features are for spam apps.
We build an
Adaptive Boost
classifier for early identification of spam apps using only the metadata of the apps.
Our classifier achieves an accuracy of over 95% with precision varying between 85% and 95% and recall varying between 38% and 98%.
We further show that a limited number of features, in the range of 10--30, generated from app metadata is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of performance.
On a set of 180,627 apps that were present at the app market during our crawl, our classifier predicts 2.
7% of the apps as potential spam.
Finally, we perform additional manual verification and show that human reviewers agree with 82% of our classifier predictions.
Related Results
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
The World Health Organization recommends 150-300 minutes of physical activity per week to lower health risks caused by sedentary behavior. Incorp...
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract B9: Smartphone applications as a source of cancer information
Abstract
The increasing popularity and advent of newer, better and relevant application programs (apps) has made smart phones an important source of healthcare infor...
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Online reviews about the purchase of products or services provided have become the main source of users’ opinions. In order to gain profit or fame, usually spam reviews are written...
Perbandingan Kinerja Algoritma Naïve Bayes Dan C.45 Dalam Klasifikasi Spam Email
Perbandingan Kinerja Algoritma Naïve Bayes Dan C.45 Dalam Klasifikasi Spam Email
Antispam dengan algoritma tertentu yang dapat memisahkan antara spam-mail dengan non spam mail. Perbandingan kinerja antara algoritma naïve bayes, dan decision tree yang memakai al...
Assessing the Quality, Privacy, and Security of Breast Cancer Apps for Arabic Speakers: Systematic Search and Review of Smartphone Apps
Assessing the Quality, Privacy, and Security of Breast Cancer Apps for Arabic Speakers: Systematic Search and Review of Smartphone Apps
Background
Breast cancer is a widespread disease, and its incidence is rapidly increasing in the Middle East and North Africa region. With the increasing availa...
Assessing the Quality, Privacy, and Security of Breast Cancer Apps for Arabic Speakers: Systematic Search and Review of Smartphone Apps (Preprint)
Assessing the Quality, Privacy, and Security of Breast Cancer Apps for Arabic Speakers: Systematic Search and Review of Smartphone Apps (Preprint)
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is a widespread disease, and its incidence is rapidly increasing in the Middle East and North Africa region. With the increasing av...
ESSENTIAL SECURITY PRACTICES FOR FORTIFYING MOBILE APPS
ESSENTIAL SECURITY PRACTICES FOR FORTIFYING MOBILE APPS
“Essential Security Practices for Fortifying Mobile Apps” is a definitive guide designed to empower developers, security professionals, and organizations with the knowledge and too...

