Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Spam Mobile Apps

View through CrossRef
The increased popularity of smartphones has attracted a large number of developers to offer various applications for the different smartphone platforms via the respective app markets. One consequence of this popularity is that the app markets are also becoming populated with spam apps. These spam apps reduce the users’ quality of experience and increase the workload of app market operators to identify these apps and remove them. Spam apps can come in many forms such as apps not having a specific functionality, those having unrelated app descriptions or unrelated keywords, or similar apps being made available several times and across diverse categories. Market operators maintain antispam policies and apps are removed through continuous monitoring. Through a systematic crawl of a popular app market and by identifying apps that were removed over a period of time, we propose a method to detect spam apps solely using app metadata available at the time of publication. We first propose a methodology to manually label a sample of removed apps, according to a set of checkpoint heuristics that reveal the reasons behind removal. This analysis suggests that approximately 35% of the apps being removed are very likely to be spam apps. We then map the identified heuristics to several quantifiable features and show how distinguishing these features are for spam apps. We build an Adaptive Boost classifier for early identification of spam apps using only the metadata of the apps. Our classifier achieves an accuracy of over 95% with precision varying between 85% and 95% and recall varying between 38% and 98%. We further show that a limited number of features, in the range of 10--30, generated from app metadata is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of performance. On a set of 180,627 apps that were present at the app market during our crawl, our classifier predicts 2.7% of the apps as potential spam. Finally, we perform additional manual verification and show that human reviewers agree with 82% of our classifier predictions.
Title: Spam Mobile Apps
Description:
The increased popularity of smartphones has attracted a large number of developers to offer various applications for the different smartphone platforms via the respective app markets.
One consequence of this popularity is that the app markets are also becoming populated with spam apps.
These spam apps reduce the users’ quality of experience and increase the workload of app market operators to identify these apps and remove them.
Spam apps can come in many forms such as apps not having a specific functionality, those having unrelated app descriptions or unrelated keywords, or similar apps being made available several times and across diverse categories.
Market operators maintain antispam policies and apps are removed through continuous monitoring.
Through a systematic crawl of a popular app market and by identifying apps that were removed over a period of time, we propose a method to detect spam apps solely using app metadata available at the time of publication.
We first propose a methodology to manually label a sample of removed apps, according to a set of checkpoint heuristics that reveal the reasons behind removal.
This analysis suggests that approximately 35% of the apps being removed are very likely to be spam apps.
We then map the identified heuristics to several quantifiable features and show how distinguishing these features are for spam apps.
We build an Adaptive Boost classifier for early identification of spam apps using only the metadata of the apps.
Our classifier achieves an accuracy of over 95% with precision varying between 85% and 95% and recall varying between 38% and 98%.
We further show that a limited number of features, in the range of 10--30, generated from app metadata is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of performance.
On a set of 180,627 apps that were present at the app market during our crawl, our classifier predicts 2.
7% of the apps as potential spam.
Finally, we perform additional manual verification and show that human reviewers agree with 82% of our classifier predictions.

Related Results

Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
Playing Pregnancy: The Ludification and Gamification of Expectant Motherhood in Smartphone Apps
IntroductionLike other forms of embodiment, pregnancy has increasingly become subject to representation and interpretation via digital technologies. Pregnancy and the unborn entity...
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
Usage of Mobile Apps to support Active Transportation: Scoping Review (Preprint)
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recommends 150-300 minutes of physical activity per week to lower health risks caused by sedentary behavior. Incorp...
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Spam Review Detection Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Online reviews about the purchase of products or services provided have become the main source of users’ opinions. In order to gain profit or fame, usually spam reviews are written...
Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores
Mobile Phone Apps for Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Prevention and Response: Systematic Search on App Stores
BackgroundSince the 2008 advent of the smartphone, more than 180 billion copies of apps have been downloaded from Apple App Store, with more than 2.6 million apps available for And...

Back to Top