Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Stephen, 1728–1729

View through CrossRef
Although the runaway slave advertisement announcing his escape accused him of stealing a horse, Stephen likely was not responsible—or if he was responsible, he didn’t use the horse to travel any significant distance. Instead, he hid on the estate of Charles Calvert, a former colonial governor. Although the Black African overseer of Charles Calvert’s plantation was punished for aiding and abetting Stephen in his escape, the Calverts advocated for leniency in the punishment of Stephen. He—with another local runaway named Cora—was sentenced to death in April 1729 for one or more of the “Villanies” he confessed to committing during his month of freedom. Stephen may have committed arson, lighting one or more of the fires that burned down local homes and barns in the weeks after his disappearance, but whatever Stephen’s supposed crimes, he received a reprieve two months later, in June. More than mercy, this stay of execution was likely a means of preserving Carroll’s capital investment in Stephen; if Stephen had been executed, Carroll would receive no compensation from the state for funds he had spent in purchasing, feeding, and clothing the man he claimed as human capital.
University of North Carolina Press
Title: Stephen, 1728–1729
Description:
Although the runaway slave advertisement announcing his escape accused him of stealing a horse, Stephen likely was not responsible—or if he was responsible, he didn’t use the horse to travel any significant distance.
Instead, he hid on the estate of Charles Calvert, a former colonial governor.
Although the Black African overseer of Charles Calvert’s plantation was punished for aiding and abetting Stephen in his escape, the Calverts advocated for leniency in the punishment of Stephen.
He—with another local runaway named Cora—was sentenced to death in April 1729 for one or more of the “Villanies” he confessed to committing during his month of freedom.
Stephen may have committed arson, lighting one or more of the fires that burned down local homes and barns in the weeks after his disappearance, but whatever Stephen’s supposed crimes, he received a reprieve two months later, in June.
More than mercy, this stay of execution was likely a means of preserving Carroll’s capital investment in Stephen; if Stephen had been executed, Carroll would receive no compensation from the state for funds he had spent in purchasing, feeding, and clothing the man he claimed as human capital.

Related Results

Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
Plasma AR Alterations and Timing of Intensified Hormone Treatment for Prostate Cancer
This randomized clinical trial explores whether hormone intensification at start of androgen deprivation therapy alters selection of androgen receptor (AR) gene alterations within ...
Learning from Morley College
Learning from Morley College
This chapter delves into Virginia Stephen’s lack of preparation for teaching at Morley, her volunteer status, Mary Sheepshanks’ mentorship, and her students’ influence. Virginia St...
Leslie Stephen
Leslie Stephen
At the time of his death, Leslie Stephen (b. 1832–d. 1904) was arguably the most eminent English Victorian man of letters. He wrote more than 60 books and hundreds of essays and re...
The Personalization of Intellectual Combat
The Personalization of Intellectual Combat
James Fitzjames Stephen—prominent barrister, prolific journalist, pugnacious polemicist, and older brother of Leslie Stephen—was elected a member of the Metaphysical Society in 187...

Back to Top