Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ONLAY AND SUBLAY MESH REPAIR IN THE TREATMENT OF VENTRAL HERNIAS

View through CrossRef
Objectives: To compare the outcomes of Onlay and Sublay mesh repair in the treatment of ventral hernias in terms of duration of surgery and early postoperative complications like seroma, surgical site infections, ap necrosis. Design : Material and method: Observational Comparative study. From 1st Sept 2021 to Sept 30th 2022, a one prospective study was done at a rural medical college. A total of 50 patients with ventral hernias meeting the inclusion & exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, with 25 patients in each group. Data was recorded in proformas. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Out of the 50 patients enrolled in Results: the study, 25 patients underwent Sublay Mesh repair & 25 patients underwent Onlay Mesh Repair. The most common post op complication observed in our study was seroma , which was seen in 5 patients: 1 (4%) were in Sublay group and 4 (16%) in Onlay mesh repair group. Wound infection was seen in 3 cases. Out of these, 1 (4%) were in Sublay group and 2 (8%) were in Onlay group. Flap necrosis was seen in 4 cases , all belonging to Onlay group The mean duration of surgery was 67 minutes in Onlay group while the mean duration of surgery was 78 minutes in Sublay group. Our study concludes that Sublay Mesh repair is superior to Onlay Mesh re Conclusion: pair in terms of post operative complications, although associated with a longer duration of surgery
Title: COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN ONLAY AND SUBLAY MESH REPAIR IN THE TREATMENT OF VENTRAL HERNIAS
Description:
Objectives: To compare the outcomes of Onlay and Sublay mesh repair in the treatment of ventral hernias in terms of duration of surgery and early postoperative complications like seroma, surgical site infections, ap necrosis.
Design : Material and method: Observational Comparative study.
From 1st Sept 2021 to Sept 30th 2022, a one prospective study was done at a rural medical college.
A total of 50 patients with ventral hernias meeting the inclusion & exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study, with 25 patients in each group.
Data was recorded in proformas.
The data was analyzed using SPSS version 22.
Out of the 50 patients enrolled in Results: the study, 25 patients underwent Sublay Mesh repair & 25 patients underwent Onlay Mesh Repair.
The most common post op complication observed in our study was seroma , which was seen in 5 patients: 1 (4%) were in Sublay group and 4 (16%) in Onlay mesh repair group.
Wound infection was seen in 3 cases.
Out of these, 1 (4%) were in Sublay group and 2 (8%) were in Onlay group.
Flap necrosis was seen in 4 cases , all belonging to Onlay group The mean duration of surgery was 67 minutes in Onlay group while the mean duration of surgery was 78 minutes in Sublay group.
Our study concludes that Sublay Mesh repair is superior to Onlay Mesh re Conclusion: pair in terms of post operative complications, although associated with a longer duration of surgery.

Related Results

Comparison between Onlay vs Sublay Mesh Techniques in Terms of Wound Infection, Seroma Formation and Recurrence-A Retrospective Study
Comparison between Onlay vs Sublay Mesh Techniques in Terms of Wound Infection, Seroma Formation and Recurrence-A Retrospective Study
Introduction: Ventral hernia repair remains a significant challenge, with onlay and sublay mesh techniques being widely used. This study evaluates these approaches in terms of woun...
Comparison of Onlay Mesh Repair Vs Sublay Mesh Repair for Ventral Abdominal Hernias: A Focus on Post Op Seroma Formation
Comparison of Onlay Mesh Repair Vs Sublay Mesh Repair for Ventral Abdominal Hernias: A Focus on Post Op Seroma Formation
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of Onlay mesh repair versus Sublay mesh repair for ventral abdominal hernias in terms of post op seroma formation. Study Design: Quasi-exper...
Comparison of Sublay Vs Onlay Mesh Hernioplasty in terms of operative time, complications and recurrence.
Comparison of Sublay Vs Onlay Mesh Hernioplasty in terms of operative time, complications and recurrence.
Objective: To compare the efficacy of Sublay vs Onlay for ventral hernias in prevention of complications. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Government Teaching Hospital Sha...
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
Primerjalna književnost na prelomu tisočletja
In a comprehensive and at times critical manner, this volume seeks to shed light on the development of events in Western (i.e., European and North American) comparative literature ...
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Contributions to bluetooth low energy mesh networks
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) has become a popular Internet of Things (IoT) technology. However, it was originally designed to only support the star topology. This PhD thesis investig...
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
AN EXPERIENCE COMPARING INGUINAL HERNIA MESH REPAIR VS DARN REPAIR
Background: Several methods for fixing inguinal hernias have been documented. Anterior or posterior approaches,open or laparoscopic procedures, may be used for hernia repair. While...
Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic VS Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
Incidence of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic VS Open Primary Ventral Hernia Repair
Background: The ventral hernias found along the midline in anterior abdominal wall, known as “primary midline ventral hernias”, are frequent in the general population. These hernia...
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Mesh-Associated Pain Syndrome: Predictors for Continence and Prolapse Mesh Removal Surgery in a Single Centre
Objective:Over the last two decades the main surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery was the insertion of non-absorbable me...

Back to Top