Early Rehabilitation Versus Conventional Approaches in Post-Traumatic Hand Injuries with Multiple Lesions: Clinical Outcomes and Future Directions

Background and Objectives: Complex hand injuries often lead to long-term functional impairment and require structured rehabilitation following surgery. While early rehabilitation may improve outcomes by preventing stiffness and adhesions, it can also increase pain and psychological distress. In contrast, delayed rehabilitation may offer short-term comfort but risks slower recovery. The study aimed to compare the outcomes of early versus delayed rehabilitation through a four-phase therapeutic protocol, with standardized assessments at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks. Materials and Methods: This study included 90 patients with complex hand trauma who underwent emergency surgical intervention followed by a structured rehabilitation program. Key parameters included active range of motion (TAM), grip strength, pain (VAS), edema, hand function (QuickDASH), and anxiety levels (GAD-7). Statistical analysis was used to evaluate differences in physical and psychological recovery over time between the two rehabilitation approaches. Results: This study demonstrated that both early and delayed postoperative rehabilitation significantly improved physical and psychological outcomes in patients with complex hand trauma. However, early rehabilitation was associated with faster resolution of edema, quicker gains in functional mobility, and earlier improvement in grip strength, despite causing higher initial levels of pain and anxiety. Conversely, delayed rehabilitation resulted in lower early pain and anxiety but showed slower functional recovery. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with flexor tendon injuries benefited most from early rehabilitation in terms of mobility, strength, and anxiety reduction, while those with multifocal or complex injuries achieved greater long-term pain relief. Conclusions: As rehabilitation continues to evolve, the adoption of personalized, multimodal, and technologically integrated strategies holds promise for improving both the speed and quality of recovery while addressing the psychological and functional dimensions of patient care. Overall, the study supports early, structured, and individualized rehabilitation protocols, emphasizing a multidisciplinary approach that integrates both physical and psychological recovery strategies.