Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ACCURACY OF NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING USING MASSIVELY PARALLEL SEQUENCING FOR DETECTING TRISOMY 21: A META-ANALYSIS

View through CrossRef
Background:Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21 aneuploidy has been widely adopted in clinical practice due to its superior accuracy. NIPT has also been developed and validated as an option for early detection of genetic abnormalities prior to invasive diagnostic procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of NIPT using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) technology for screening Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters. Methods:This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed literature on the accuracy of NIPT with MPS technology for Down syndrome screening in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters, following PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies were included, and data extraction was performed independently by three reviewers. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Results:Among 485,365 pregnant women screened for major autosomal trisomies confirmed by fetal karyotype or newborn phenotype, 2,092 cases were verified from the total population. The sensitivity of NIPT for detecting trisomy 21 ranged from 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.87) to 1.00 (95% CI: 0.48–1.00) based on the eight identified studies. NIPT showed very high specificity, with most studies reporting a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI: 1.00–1.00). Conclusion: NIPT using MPS technology demonstrated very high sensitivity and specificity in detecting trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters. It is a reliable and effective screening tool due to its high accuracy in detecting true-positive cases and minimizing false-positive results.
Title: ACCURACY OF NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING USING MASSIVELY PARALLEL SEQUENCING FOR DETECTING TRISOMY 21: A META-ANALYSIS
Description:
Background:Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for fetal trisomy 21 aneuploidy has been widely adopted in clinical practice due to its superior accuracy.
NIPT has also been developed and validated as an option for early detection of genetic abnormalities prior to invasive diagnostic procedures.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of NIPT using Massively Parallel Sequencing (MPS) technology for screening Down syndrome in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters.
Methods:This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed literature on the accuracy of NIPT with MPS technology for Down syndrome screening in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters, following PRISMA guidelines.
Eight studies were included, and data extraction was performed independently by three reviewers.
Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
Results:Among 485,365 pregnant women screened for major autosomal trisomies confirmed by fetal karyotype or newborn phenotype, 2,092 cases were verified from the total population.
The sensitivity of NIPT for detecting trisomy 21 ranged from 0.
80 (95% CI: 0.
73–0.
87) to 1.
00 (95% CI: 0.
48–1.
00) based on the eight identified studies.
NIPT showed very high specificity, with most studies reporting a specificity of 1.
00 (95% CI: 1.
00–1.
00).
Conclusion: NIPT using MPS technology demonstrated very high sensitivity and specificity in detecting trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in singleton pregnancies across all trimesters.
It is a reliable and effective screening tool due to its high accuracy in detecting true-positive cases and minimizing false-positive results.

Related Results

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR TRISOMY 21, 18 AND 13 BY QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENT POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN WITH HIGH RISK
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS FOR TRISOMY 21, 18 AND 13 BY QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENT POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN WITH HIGH RISK
Introduction: Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 plays a very important role in the improving population quality. This study was aimed at (1) Identifying the prevalence of...
Is ultrasound alone enough for prenatal screening of trisomy 18? A single centre experience in 69 cases over 10 years
Is ultrasound alone enough for prenatal screening of trisomy 18? A single centre experience in 69 cases over 10 years
AbstractObjectivesTo evaluate ultrasound scan and other prenatal screening tests for trisomy 18 in a regional obstetric unit and to review the management approach for women with po...
Atypicality or Specific Screen: Which is Better at Detecting Non-Down's Chromosomal Anomalies?
Atypicality or Specific Screen: Which is Better at Detecting Non-Down's Chromosomal Anomalies?
I evaluated the value of adding a trisomy 18 screen to routine Down's screening and compared it with the benefits of atypicality screening. I studied 5080 unaffected pregnancies, 1...
Comprehensive phenotyping of fetuses with trisomy 18: a perinatal center experience
Comprehensive phenotyping of fetuses with trisomy 18: a perinatal center experience
Trisomy 18 is the second most common aneuploidy after trisomy 21. It presents with varying degrees of heterogeneous clinical phenotypes involving multiple organ systems, with a hig...
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
MARS-seq2.0: an experimental and analytical pipeline for indexed sorting combined with single-cell RNA sequencing v1
Human tissues comprise trillions of cells that populate a complex space of molecular phenotypes and functions and that vary in abundance by 4–9 orders of magnitude. Relying solely ...
Childhood Hyperdiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Childhood Hyperdiploid Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Abstract Background: Acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL) with 51-67 chromosomes in leukemic cells are defined as high-hyperdiploid (HHD). In childhood...

Back to Top