Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Prey selection and diel feeding of the freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi

View through CrossRef
Summary1. The diet of the invasive freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi (Lankester), was assessed by analysing its stomach contents.2. The medusae ingested various zooplankton and benthic prey in the 0.1–3.0 mm size range. The selectivity indices for prey showed that larger zooplankton (0.4–1.4 mm) and active prey such as copepods were preferred; small potential prey, and the loricate rotifer Keratella cochlearis in particular, were almost never consumed. Measurements suggest that spacing between the tentacle branches could determine prey selection. Another possibility is that some prey are too small or slow to activate nematocysts after collision with the predator. Prey > 1.4 mm can probably escape or are otherwise too large to be handled.3. The medusae of Craspedacusta medusae stayed in deep water during daytime and migrated upwards at night. The greatest number of prey in freshwater jellyfish stomachs was detected at night.4. Calculation of consumption rates, based on mean stomach contents and digestion times of 4–5 h, showed that, on average, one medusa takes 190 zooplankton prey day−−1 at a mean prey density of about 100 L−−1. At the observed medusae density of 1 m−−3, the cropping rate was about 0.2 zooplankton prey L−−1 day−−1.
Title: Prey selection and diel feeding of the freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi
Description:
Summary1.
 The diet of the invasive freshwater jellyfish, Craspedacusta sowerbyi (Lankester), was assessed by analysing its stomach contents.
2.
 The medusae ingested various zooplankton and benthic prey in the 0.
1–3.
0 mm size range.
The selectivity indices for prey showed that larger zooplankton (0.
4–1.
4 mm) and active prey such as copepods were preferred; small potential prey, and the loricate rotifer Keratella cochlearis in particular, were almost never consumed.
Measurements suggest that spacing between the tentacle branches could determine prey selection.
Another possibility is that some prey are too small or slow to activate nematocysts after collision with the predator.
Prey > 1.
4 mm can probably escape or are otherwise too large to be handled.
3.
 The medusae of Craspedacusta medusae stayed in deep water during daytime and migrated upwards at night.
The greatest number of prey in freshwater jellyfish stomachs was detected at night.
4.
 Calculation of consumption rates, based on mean stomach contents and digestion times of 4–5 h, showed that, on average, one medusa takes 190 zooplankton prey day−−1 at a mean prey density of about 100 L−−1.
At the observed medusae density of 1 m−−3, the cropping rate was about 0.
2 zooplankton prey L−−1 day−−1.

Related Results

Prey feeding increases water stress in the omnivorous predator Dicyphus hesperus
Prey feeding increases water stress in the omnivorous predator Dicyphus hesperus
AbstractThe effects of water stress (produced by water deprivation and prey feeding) on plant feeding were investigated in the omnivorous predator Dicyphus hesperus Knight (Hemipte...
Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator
Habitat selection when killing primary versus alternative prey species supports prey specialization in an apex predator
© 2019 The Zoological Society of London Many predators specialize on one or several prey species that they select from the range of potential prey. Predator specialization on prima...
Poems
Poems
poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poems selection poem...
Predatory Behavior of Yellow Baboons
Predatory Behavior of Yellow Baboons
Abstract1. A group of 32 yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus) in the Masai-Amboseli National Park, Kenya, caught and ate 45 vertebrate prey items during 2519.19 hours of observation...
The relationship among environmental variables, jellyfish and non‐gelatinous zooplankton: A case study in the north of the Gulf of Oman
The relationship among environmental variables, jellyfish and non‐gelatinous zooplankton: A case study in the north of the Gulf of Oman
AbstractProcesses underlying the temporal and spatial variations observed in the distribution of jellyfish and non‐gelatinous zooplankton in the Gulf of Oman are not well understoo...

Back to Top